![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: How many pieces make a collection? | |||
One - Even one watch can make a collection: it's a mindset |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 12.07% |
Two - At least a pair of watches before its a collection |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
34 | 29.31% |
Three - Ya need 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
49 | 42.24% |
Four - 4+ |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 16.38% |
Voters: 116. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 312
|
What is a collection?
Having read way too many threads on this forum I constantly see references to collections -- recently I saw a post about 3+ watches being a collection. Not sure I agree..
![]() ![]() Is it a mindset that you have a collection or are a collector? Can you have a one piece collection? Is owning two watches having a collection or just having a pair of watches? Where does a collection begin 1, 2, 3? Or 4+? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 6,823
|
Although I feel that you could call one watch a collection based on mindset, the verbiage itself implies more than one based off of the definition of the word.
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 16570 | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North America
Posts: 2,368
|
Just one carefully curated watch. There are several collectors who downsized from several to just one, doesn’t make them any less of a collector.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
According to Merriam-Webster a collection is "an accumulation of objects gathered for study, comparison, or exhibition or as a hobby" and "Group, a collection of symptoms, such as fatigue, headaches, and joint pain". So zero watches or one watch are not a collection. Obviously. Two are just a pair, not a group, because a group is commonly formed of more than two items. For that reason, you need three watches to consider yourself a collector IMO, but I'm cool if someone with just a watch thinks he owns a collection, or even zero watches on his imaginary collection.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Taipei
Posts: 146
|
A collection by definition is a group of objects where a group is two or more things.
Therefore a ‘1 watch collection’ should be referred to as ‘my watch’. Got 2 (or more) watches? That can count as a collection. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,626
|
I think anyone with 2 or more watches calls it a collection but I see a whole lot more thought and purpose in some than I do in others.
Done right its a very personal thing that takes homology, personality, lifestyle and style into account. The ones that disappoint seem to be little more that the top 6 hard to get referances. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,738
|
If you are a real WIS, one great watch of whatever means a ton to YOU is enough to qualify as a collection to me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,587
|
Quote:
There is nothing wrong with being a one-watch owner. I personally wish I could become one, but alas, the lure of various functions and complications is simply too great. But one watch does not make a collection, and I'm shocked that people continue to suggest such a thing exists. A collection is, by definition, a group of things or people. You go deeper into what a collection is based off how said multiple elements relate to one another. Perhaps you only collect dive watches and the differing factor is the font, or the layout, or additional features. Perhaps you collect watches that have NOTHING to do with each other except the time. Whatever it is, great- but in that collection are various elements which have some sort of hypothetical relationship among themselves. One element doesn't do that.
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: South Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT
Posts: 350
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Ben
Location: Ireland
Watch: 1 OR 2
Posts: 2,640
|
More than 1 watch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,679
|
I have a Submariner and a Speedmaster. If I count my Apple Watch, then I suppose I have a collection too.
:) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Singapore
Watch: OP36, SEIKO Turtle
Posts: 56
|
G-Shock + 2 others. Minimum 3 at least.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,089
|
I would say 3+
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: 116660
Posts: 507
|
Yes OP, the correct answer is three. If you want to show a visitor your collection, they will be stupefied if there are only two watches. They may not be confused if there are three.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,176
|
3 or more sounds good to me.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.