Need help authenticate this Tiffany Sub

[baumare]

Originally Posted by alwayshere

For everyone's benefit and to be 100% clear - with or without the stamp is the 168000?

The 168000 is the one with the stamp, this reference sign the passage from using the old steel 316L to the new steel 904L.

fullsizeoutput_10ab.jpeg

[alwayshere]

Originally Posted by baumare

The 168000 is the one with the stamp, this reference sign the passage from using the old steel 316L to the new steel 904L.

Attachment 1219783

Thanks - noted.

[Nick9]

Got it. Thanks!

[HarryLime]

Originally Posted by 2000-NJDEVILS

To the OP,
I’m not 100% sure, but I believe Rolex took the AD status from Tiffany’s and Fortunoff’s around 1989-1991... That said, Tiffany’s wasn’t Tourneau and didn’t sell tens of thousands of Rolex watches every year - I can’t say one way or another if the dial and or case is bogus, but I can tell you that no box and no papers equals DON’T BUY. DON’T BUY. DON’T BUY.

The papers are even easier to fake than the dial... Study the dial closely and draw your own conclusions. Fakes are not perfect.

[saxo3]

@OP
Rolex with Tiffany & Co. dials are a minefield.
Original papers are very rare and don't really help (see post #34).
As a start, you need much better photos of the dial to compare all text details.
Finally, the only safe way is an authentification by Rolex SA.