ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

djemmtee · 20 September 2006, 05:23 PM

for some reason, i dont think it looks right, the rolex in the middle looks kinda small right ? it a definate fake right ?

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Submariner...ayphotohosting

JJ Irani · 20 September 2006, 05:25 PM

Picture is terrible, but at that price and the fact that it's ebay....it could be anyone's guess!!

I wouldn't touch such offers with a bloody barge pole!!

RogerF · 20 September 2006, 05:28 PM

the seller doesnt have much of a history on the bay so right away I would look elsewhere. If this was a toaster or a flashlight I wouldnt care too much about how much feedback/transactions a seller has......

djemmtee · 20 September 2006, 05:28 PM

how bout this one, the second 2 is off on the date

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-50th-Anniv...QQcmdZViewItem

djemmtee · 20 September 2006, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RogerF

the seller doesnt have much of a history on the bay so right away I would look elsewhere. If this was a toaster or a flashlight I wouldnt care too much about how much feedback/transactions a seller has......

i wouldnt buy anything on ebay more than 100bucks. let alone a folex

howitzer · 21 September 2006, 01:10 AM

Benz looks heavy on the hour hand. Fonts look heavy overall.

Rodmo · 21 September 2006, 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djemmtee

for some reason, i dont think it looks right, the rolex in the middle looks kinda small right ? it a definate fake right ?

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Submariner...ayphotohosting

Looking at the real one (AD purchased) on my wrist, the slope on the crown guards looks wrong. It is hard to compare with such a poor pic....

Cheers.........Rod

morgman · 21 September 2006, 02:12 AM

I usually think ultra blurry pictures are a bad sign. I mean, my camera is OLD and not very good, but it takes way better pictures than that.

That logo does look too small too.

Rockrolex · 21 September 2006, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djemmtee

for some reason, i dont think it looks right, the rolex in the middle looks kinda small right ? it a definate fake right ?

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Submariner...ayphotohosting

The seller has one feedback (as a buyer). He has one lousy picture (but he will e-mail other pics to prosective bidders). He started at a ridiculously low price.

This one screams FAKE

C.J. · 21 September 2006, 02:41 AM

I don't know about this one

JJ Irani · 21 September 2006, 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C.J.

I don't know about this one

Do you at least know any damn thing about the one you're wearing, you tosser?

djemmtee · 21 September 2006, 06:08 AM

im emailing him, he responded to me stating he has all the papers, boxes, and anchor verifying the authenticity. im waiting till i get the photos so i can post them herre.

djemmtee · 21 September 2006, 06:17 AM

he sent me photos but the were all 2200x1400....and extremely blurry, you could not even read the word "submariner"

djemmtee · 21 September 2006, 06:21 AM

you tell me waht you think, some poor guys gonna get it

RogerF · 21 September 2006, 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djemmtee

you tell me waht you think, some poor guys gonna get it

you can't link pics directly off your gmail, try photobucket.com they are great for hosting.

jaycee · 21 September 2006, 08:16 AM

Looking at that first auction, it looks suspiciously like some shill bidding is going on as well.

mike · 21 September 2006, 08:41 AM

C.J. · 21 September 2006, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Do you at least know any damn thing about the one you're wearing, you tosser?

Just that, unlike yours, mine was made in Switzerland

viper · 21 September 2006, 11:55 AM

fake, fake, fake

font on the dial looks nothing like mine..

djemmtee · 21 September 2006, 03:10 PM

his pics are very well timed, all the close ups seem to have the minute hand covering the "A" in submariner.

JJ Irani · 21 September 2006, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C.J.

Just that, unlike yours, mine was made in Switzerland

Ah ah....therein lies the difference, my friend. Yours was....whereas mine is!!!!

djemmtee · 22 September 2006, 06:07 AM

you be the judge, these are some photos he sent me.....one of my co workers really wants this watch so im trying to help him find one....but i come across shady ones like these:

i took mine off my wrist to compare but it just doesnt look right to me.

BTW THESE ARE NOT PHOTOS OF MY WATCH!!!!

HERES a photo of mine:

20 September 2006, 05:23 PM	#1
djemmtee 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2006 Real Name: Mike Location: OC, California Watch: LV Sub Posts: 1,942	check out this auction: for some reason, i dont think it looks right, the rolex in the middle looks kinda small right ? it a definate fake right ? http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Submariner...ayphotohosting __________________ 116610 LN 116713 LN

20 September 2006, 05:25 PM	#2
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,317	Picture is terrible, but at that price and the fact that it's ebay....it could be anyone's guess!! I wouldn't touch such offers with a bloody barge pole!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

20 September 2006, 05:28 PM	#4
djemmtee 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2006 Real Name: Mike Location: OC, California Watch: LV Sub Posts: 1,942	how bout this one, the second 2 is off on the date http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-50th-Anniv...QQcmdZViewItem __________________ 116610 LN 116713 LN

21 September 2006, 02:41 AM	#10
C.J. "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: * Posts: 10,196	I don't know about this one __________________ Me? I'm still looking for Kokomo. I just hope that damn golfer isn't there

21 September 2006, 06:08 AM	#12
djemmtee 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2006 Real Name: Mike Location: OC, California Watch: LV Sub Posts: 1,942	im emailing him, he responded to me stating he has all the papers, boxes, and anchor verifying the authenticity. im waiting till i get the photos so i can post them herre. __________________ 116610 LN 116713 LN

20 September 2006, 05:28 PM	#3
RogerF "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Duh! Location: Toronto Canada Watch: a gonna do? Posts: 2,572	the seller doesnt have much of a history on the bay so right away I would look elsewhere. If this was a toaster or a flashlight I wouldnt care too much about how much feedback/transactions a seller has......

21 September 2006, 01:10 AM	#6
howitzer Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: NYC Watch: GMT Duce Posts: 38	Benz looks heavy on the hour hand. Fonts look heavy overall.

21 September 2006, 02:12 AM	#8
morgman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Bay Area, CA Posts: 475	I usually think ultra blurry pictures are a bad sign. I mean, my camera is OLD and not very good, but it takes way better pictures than that. That logo does look too small too.

21 September 2006, 06:17 AM	#13
djemmtee 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2006 Real Name: Mike Location: OC, California Watch: LV Sub Posts: 1,942	he sent me photos but the were all 2200x1400....and extremely blurry, you could not even read the word "submariner" __________________ 116610 LN 116713 LN

21 September 2006, 06:21 AM	#14
djemmtee 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2006 Real Name: Mike Location: OC, California Watch: LV Sub Posts: 1,942	you tell me waht you think, some poor guys gonna get it __________________ 116610 LN 116713 LN

21 September 2006, 08:16 AM	#16
jaycee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Real Name: John Location: Halesworth, UK Watch: GMT Master II Posts: 69	Looking at that first auction, it looks suspiciously like some shill bidding is going on as well.

21 September 2006, 08:41 AM	#17
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,682

21 September 2006, 11:55 AM	#19
viper "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Northeast Posts: 943	fake, fake, fake font on the dial looks nothing like mine.. __________________ 16610LV 16200 116600 116500

21 September 2006, 03:10 PM	#20
djemmtee 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2006 Real Name: Mike Location: OC, California Watch: LV Sub Posts: 1,942	his pics are very well timed, all the close ups seem to have the minute hand covering the "A" in submariner. __________________ 116610 LN 116713 LN

22 September 2006, 06:07 AM	#22
djemmtee 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2006 Real Name: Mike Location: OC, California Watch: LV Sub Posts: 1,942	you be the judge, these are some photos he sent me.....one of my co workers really wants this watch so im trying to help him find one....but i come across shady ones like these: i took mine off my wrist to compare but it just doesnt look right to me. BTW THESE ARE NOT PHOTOS OF MY WATCH!!!! HERES a photo of mine: __________________ 116610 LN 116713 LN

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)