![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Frank
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 253
|
15500 vs. 26331
In a dream world where you can walk into a boutique and both a 15500 and a 26631 are available, which do you choose and why? I love the clean look of the 15500, but being time only, I think I want something more.
Currently my stable is Rolex (SkyDweller, SD43, Exp2, and DSSD) and an old Patek Calatrava that was my fathers. Now looking to branch out. Thanks in advance for your thoughts! ![]() Frank |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 54
|
I went w/the 26331st personally... i just love the chrono dial look. it also looks like you don't have a chrono in the lineup... might be a good time to start!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,013
|
I prefer the clean look of the 15500 and also the display of the movement in the back of the watch is something I love. Nothing wrong with the 26631 though lovely watch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Posts: 4,366
|
If this is a dream, they would have 26320 with contrasting sub-dials and a display back...
But if in the real world, I would go with the 26331ST. I wear it more than the 15500 personally. Plus you don't have a chrono in the mix there. I personally find the 15500 is nice when I put it on, but gets dull by the afternoon. too much negative and empty space. I much prefer the dial layout of the 15400 for that reason to balance it out - again personally. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Melb, Australia
Watch: 116710LN, 26331ST
Posts: 298
|
ROC for a one AP collection
RO if you want to add a ROO later All in my humble opinion of course |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,677
|
I have owned both, in various dial configurations. I prefer the 15400 over the 15500, optically the 15500 dial looks a bit empty and makes the bezel look thinner. The chrono wears bigger but I think optically looks better on the wrist. I prefer the 26320 without contrasting subdials and I pair with a 15202 for my AP pair. The blue on the newer 26331 are much darker than previous dials and the contrasting subdials gets old after awhile. My subjection .02.
![]()
__________________
Richard Mille RG RM030 || Richard Mille RM72ti || AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono || AP Royal Oak Off Shore Gulf Blue 26238 || AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST || AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST || ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 || Cartier Santos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Stephen
Location: UK
Watch: AP
Posts: 2,663
|
By coincidence I was faced with a 15500 (silver) and a 26331 (panda) at the AP House a couple of months back. Such a dilemma at the time. Both really amazing watches and very hard to decide. Bizarrely at the time I kind of preferred the panda but I went for the 15500.
The 26331 wears bigger (well it seemed like it) and I prefer that, also the dials are quite striking. It was my first AP and based on a number of factors, including that I’ve got a white dial Daytona and if I didn’t bond with AP I figured the 15500 would be easier to move along. As soon as I got on the train home I realised a few things: 1. The dial on the silver was stunning, as was the bracelet. 2. I’d have been totally happy with either choice. 3. Unless things are taking out of my hands, I’m 100% sure I’ll own another AP again. I’d like to think I have a 15500 and a 26331. Either way, you’ll love it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Dubai
Posts: 807
|
I know you are looking for the 41 mm .. was on the same bought... craving the RO blue dial . but given that it was out of reach i never thought twice of getting the chrono .. falling in love with it every day .. however im having the 26315ST
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Dallas
Watch: 26331ST/116710BLNR
Posts: 107
|
I personally was on the waitlist for the 15500ST for 18+ months with the Bal Harbor boutique. I have wanted the silver dial for the last 6-8 years and so started making the moves to aquire it and pretty much obsessed about it.
Oddly enough about 4 weeks ago they told me it would he another 6-8 months on 15500st in Silver, but he could offer me the 26331ST- Panda now. After 24 hours of contemplating waiting longer or going with the ROC I started to find the non chrono dial boring after obsessing about it for so long. I purchased the 26331ST-Panda and am extremely happy with my decision. The only thing I wish is the ROC had an exhibition case back. My collection is now only 2 watches the 26331 panda and 116710BLNR-Batman Hope this helps! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 3,896
|
I was offered the choice between a 15400 black/grey and 26331 two years ago at the than newly-opened boutique in Frankfurt. Eventually got a 15500 grey dial in 2019 and have asked for a 26331 for next year. In isolation, I still think RO and then ROC is the way to go, but w/o a chrono in the collection, ROC has another argument going for it as first AP.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: -
Posts: 407
|
Chrono for the win! I also prefer the proportions and dial of the 15400
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 6,009
|
It's good to have both. I got 15500OR with full rose gold bracelet, I love the clean and very elegant look, I also use as dress watch sometime also. I am on the wait list for 26331st blue dial.
__________________
Rolex: 116621, 126333, 126711CHNR, 114060, 116500LN White, 126660 JC, 126710BLNR, 126710BLRO, 116610LV, 126610LN, 126610LV, 116508 YG Green Dial, 124300 Turquoise, 126719BLRO Meteorite dial, 228235 Olive dial ,126755SARU, 116505 RG Black dial, 326934 Blue Sky D. AP: 15451ST Blue, 15500OR w/Bracelet, 14790SA, 14790BA, 26022BC(Salmon) PP: 5524R, 5712G, ALS: Time Zone 136.032, Cartier: WGSA0030, WSSA0061, YG Oct. 2965, Carree 2961, YG Carree, Tank W5000156 Breguet: 7137BA, MontBlanc: 109996" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,212
|
I’d prefer chrono. The 15500 is just too bare for me
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Frank
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 253
|
Thanks for all the great feedback! I was leaning towards the 26331 to fill the chrono gap in my collection. I suspect a time only RO will find it's way into my box at some point as well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Scott
Location: Texas
Posts: 338
|
I was in a similar spot, but because i had the reverse panda speedy, went with the 3 hander.
__________________
SD43, VC 4520, 5130R, Pam00111, Speedy Tuesday 1. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Boston
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,051
|
I owned the 15500st, sold it and now own the 26331. Both are black dials but I prefer the contrast that the white subdials give vs the fully black dial on the 15500. Playing around with the chrono is another thing I love.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 159
|
I favor 26331 for its dial proportion and balance over the empty looking 15500.
Of all colors in 26331, I like the panda contrast combination best over the blue. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: LA/NYC
Posts: 98
|
My stable is fairly similar to yours and I went with the ROC Panda and couldn’t be happier with the decision.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 759
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Frank
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 253
|
Update guys, in case you didn't see my "incoming" post
![]()
__________________
Current stable - AP: 26331, 15703, 15510 Rolex: 326934, 126600, 116660, 216570, 126710BLNR, 116610LV IWC: 5004, 5001 Patek: 3744, 5968A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 759
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 3,896
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 3970
Posts: 3,911
|
Personally prefer the symmetrical subdials of the 26320 versions. This one is the limited Leo Messi with a tantalum bezel.
15500 and 15400 are nice too but prefer the Chrono. If going 3 hander would do the 15202 personally ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Gareth
Location: Surrey, UK
Watch: AP/Rolex
Posts: 2,329
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 759
|
I love that! Looks great on your wrist and definitely different from the base AP chronos.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: EU
Posts: 248
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Frank
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 253
|
Title - Incoming and Over the Moon! from March 17, 2021
__________________
Current stable - AP: 26331, 15703, 15510 Rolex: 326934, 126600, 116660, 216570, 126710BLNR, 116610LV IWC: 5004, 5001 Patek: 3744, 5968A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.