ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 January 2022, 03:27 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: US
Posts: 2,204
|
Oyster bracelet sizing
My AD sized my no date Submariner and it fits well. The glide lock clasp gives me the play that I need. I have 4 full link on the 6 side and 6 on the 12 side. I haven’t measured the links near the clasp to see if they are interchangeable but wouldn’t 5 on each side make the clasp just lay better? They took one link out when fitting. Thanks in advance.
|
2 January 2022, 04:33 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: .
Posts: 602
|
Oyster bracelet sizing
It is not unusual for the 12 o’clock side to have different links than the 6 o’clock side. Your wrist isn’t symmetrical.
It’s not to do with the number of links but whether the watch sits comfortably and balanced on your wrist. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 January 2022, 04:39 PM | #3 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,960
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2 January 2022, 04:57 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Andrew
Location: USA
Watch: BLRO
Posts: 738
|
You want more links on the 12 o’clock side. If you have 5 and 5 the case will likely sit too far on the outside of your wrist.
|
2 January 2022, 05:16 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: U.S.
Watch: DaytonaC
Posts: 172
|
I just had my sub fitted that way as well, with only 1 link removed and it seems to fit well. Not sure 5 and 5 would sit properly.
|
2 January 2022, 05:27 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,664
|
Quote:
__________________
Submariner Date 116610LN | GMT-Master II 126710BLNR on Jubilee | Explorer Rolesor 124273 | Explorer II Polar 226570 |
|
3 January 2022, 01:17 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: US
Posts: 2,204
|
Thanks all. Sounds like things are as they should be.
|
3 January 2022, 01:22 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,462
|
This is a slippery slope because wrist shape and wrist size/girth will be the determining factor.. Depending on the clasp, the visible buckle of the clasp doesn’t tell the entire story on how it sits on the wrist as the folding hinge usually extends past the visible buckle under 1.5 links on models without the glidelock clasp. You may want to consider where this folding hinge sits on your wrist shape because that actually touches the skin. The Glidelock is another story as the entire buckle is more bulky and heavy so that will act as a opposing pendulum to the head of the watch. You can see there are a lot of factors for a comfortable fit than where the head of the watch sits on top the wrist. Most times, perfect symmetry with the bracelet and head of the watch is not the most comfortable. 1 less link on the 6 o’clock side use to be a good place to start but you must consider the entire length of the clasp including the hinge area. Not everyone wants the 6 o’clock side of the watch head to lean in as this may cause a caming effect causing more pressure against your wrist on one side by the head of the watch rather than equally distributing the weight across the entire case back. This is where it may look good but not feel as good on the wrist. For maximum comfort you need the entire surface of the watch head and the entire surface of the clasp to equally distribute weight across all surface areas touching your skin. You can see now that wrist shape and the position of the head and clasp need to be very customized regardless how tight or lose the fit is.
I have spent decades sizing bracelets to now be able to look at the shape of your wrist and size it close to perfect on the first attempt. You only learn this by time and experimentation.
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.