ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 January 2022, 06:28 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,866
|
Microbrand Musings (ft. Lorier, Halios, Baltic)
It is both a crazy and amazing era for watch enthusiasts. While certain brands/models have been hyped beyond accessibility, opportunities have arisen for small brands with affordable options. Microbrands, which are typically run by truly independent individuals/groups aiming to make the "best" watch they can in the most steamlined way possible, have risen in visibility in this social media age. Hardware usually produced in Asia and movements that represent the least expensive but respectable versions of their type. How do they rate? I started this thread to share my thoughts and observations, and invite yours well.
This is not a watch review per se, but it is more of a reflection on my experience with the three brands in the title. It its certainly not comprehensive nor authoritative. Here goes: Lorier: run by a New York-based couple, Lorier focuses on vintage-inspired pieces. The Lorier Safari pictured here is my current Lorier watch (and I like it!), but it is probably not the most typical of the brand. Beside the styling, Lorier's calling cards are acrylic crystals and articulating bracelet. Early on Lorier had been touted by some as a better alternative to Seiko watches. I actually think that while they might be in the price range of entry-level Seiko mechanical watches, they actually don't feel or vibe like Seiko. I actually think Lorier is more style-wise like a entry-priced Tudor. Hear me out on this (I mean it as a compliment to both Lorier and Tudor). Not ready to pony up almost $4k for a BB58? Get a Neptune. Can't source the superhot BB Chronograph? Get a Gemini. Not ready to take the plunge with the BB GMT? Get a Hyperion. Want that BB36 or Rolex Explorer vibe? Get the Falcon. Lorier somehow manages to respectfully entire those design spaces without being completely copycat. Halios: run by a cool guy in BC, Canada, Halios is a bit of a founding father in the microbrand world. Still made in very small batches, the rush to get these is crazy. Pictured here is the Fairwind, the brand's most recent dive-style watch. Halios watches are very well made. While none of the watches shared here are "luxury," the Halios feels the closest to it. For example, while the Lorier Neptune might hold you over until you're ready for a Tudor BB58 (or a Sub), the Halios Fairwind might just scratch that itch entirely. The watch is very thoughtfully engineered. Case in point: it has an adjust-on-the-fly clasp on the bracelet that puts almost all brands not-named Rolex to shame. I was agnostic about adjustable clasps before; now I know that there's pretty much no excuse for the major companies not to engineer these for their bracelets. Baltic: run by French dude with vintage tastes. Baltic has received a lot of prominent love from the watch media in the past few years. Most of Baltic's models are on their second generation of design, and generally speaking I think these are better than the first gen. Like most watch brands, Baltic sources high-value movements to power its watches. The argument against Baltic by some detractors is that for a fraction of the cost, they could get the same movement in ________ from AliExpress. No argument here. The point with Baltic, as well phrased by others, is that you're paying for the design. When I scan the various cheaper options out there for each of the movements that Baltic uses, I like the way Baltic houses them best in almost every case. For example, I wanted a Seagull ST1901 chronograph movement. For my tastes, the Baltic Bicompax is the most beautiful case for this respected movement, thus I made the decision to pay the "premium" for the enjoyment the watch brings. In summary, microbrands represent an opportunity to get something slightly different from the mass-produced stuff for a reasonable price. These brands are mostly founded or run by watch enthusiasts like us (or folks with a strong interest in industrial design). I don't think that they "blow away" watches at higher price points. If you want a Rolex Sub or an Omega Speedmaster, nothing but the real deal is going to satisfy. But microbrands do offer a lot. In fact, I'd say that you pay for what you get, and you get what you paid for with microbrands. While more expensive watches can be just as a satisfying, the returns might diminish as that price creeps upward. Basically I appreciate microbrands for what they are, and I appreciate watches from other sectors of the horological spectrum for what they are. What are your thoughts on microbrands? What has your experience been? Any that catch your eye? Please share. |
28 January 2022, 09:59 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: N/A
Posts: 248
|
Do you have all of these?
|
28 January 2022, 08:34 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
|
I'm surprised there hasn't been more in the way of responses to this thread. A great post OP, I also have a range of micro brands in my collection and enjoy the variations in design as well as in many cases a lot of watch for little money.
In no particular order I have a Lorier Neptune lll which has a lovely domed Plexiglass, nice fully articulating bracelet and a bevelled chamfer that runs along the entire side of the case. All in all a good watch for the price. A Helson Skindiver, which is built like a tank. Baltic Aquascaphe GMT Baltic Aquascaphe Dual Crown. I agree with the OP comments re the design of Baltic's watches which is exceptional but the built quality is also in my opinion a step above many micro brands, with the final assembly taking place in France, including movement regulation. Finally my latest acquisition a Marnaut Seascape, another super compressor style watch and an excellent watch at a very competitive price. With the exception of the Helson which is -6 secs per day, the rest are well within COSC spec and the Baltic Dual Crown at +0.1 sec per day is more accurate than any of my Rolex and Omega's. It would be good to see what others have |
29 January 2022, 05:15 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,866
|
Thanks @dlrolex and @stevedssd for showing this thread some love
@dlrolex -- yes, those pictured in my posted are mine. I wanted to be able to share my specific (albeit limited) experience with microbrands to stimulate conversation @stevedssd -- I too thought there'd be more response to this thread. There seem to be a number of members who enjoy a diversity in their watch collections. Thanks for sharing your microbrand watches; really great examples, and the photography brings out the best in them. |
29 January 2022, 02:49 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Varies
Posts: 2,057
|
Love the Microbrands here are mine.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.