![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: 216570 white
Posts: 521
|
Grand Seiko SBGR029 or Aqua Terra Mid-Size
I have been giving serious consideration to these two watches, and had all but decided on the GS.
However, the new version of the AT now has me thinking twice. I think they are very comparable watches from a fitting a niche needed in my collection standpoint. I'd love to hear what people on this forum have to say, as I have always found this to be the best watch forum. ![]() The purchase will not occur for a few months (I have a "healthy lifestyle" milestone I decided would be awarded with one of these watches, and it will be this summer most likely before I am off the smokes a sufficient period of time and have lost some unneeded weight). So I thought in the mean time I could benefit from a little input from others. Grand Seiko SBGR029 ![]() I have almost as many Seikos as Omegas in my collection, but no GS. The GS has a certain "stealthy" aspect to it, which I like. The crown guards appeal to me as primarly a sport watch owner, and that slightly blue-tinted dial has always caugt my eye (although I have not seen one in person, and likely will not unless i pull the trigger, so it might not be as alluring in person). The one thing about higher end JDM Seikos I have found lacking is the bracelet. I am concerned the GS bracelet might not be as nice as one might hope for a watch of this price. Aqua-Terra Mid-Size ![]() I really like the grey-teck dial on the new version of the AT. The new version has a framed date window, the lack of which was a real problem for me with the previous AT style (funny how the smallest design element can make or break the watch for some of us). I have been pleased with all of my Omegas. However, having a current model DeVille GMT, a Speedy, a vintage Connie, and many vintage Seamasters, I am thinking another Omega might not be as special/unique as a GS. I was trying to convince myself to get a datejust instead of either, but at 36mm, it is just too small. Both the GS and the mid-size AT are around 38-39mm, which I think is just what I need/want. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: 216570 white
Posts: 521
|
It took a little longer than I expected (13 years) to decide which one to go with, but I recently decided to pick up the SBGR029.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Southeastern USA
Watch: Omega Seamaster PO
Posts: 3,885
|
No one has ever accused you of procrastination, have they?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: SoCal
Watch: 16570
Posts: 75
|
lmao looks wonderful, congrats on the pickup and closing the loop here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Upstate
Watch: 116600
Posts: 2,156
|
The greatest “circle back” in forum history. I think Omega is on a third or fourth subsequent version of the AT since your original post. Congratulations on a great watch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: 216570 white
Posts: 521
|
Quote:
Also, I was keeping my eyes open for a well-priced complete set, including all of the bracelet links. That took some time. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Upstate
Watch: 116600
Posts: 2,156
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.