![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Battle of the Subs: Which do you prefer? | |||
Rolex 16610 Sub |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
80 | 40.40% |
Rolex 116610 Ceramic Sub |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
118 | 59.60% |
Voters: 198. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Dirk
Location: Bavaria
Watch: 1675
Posts: 15
|
Five digit!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 27
|
Sub C for me because I have it. 5 digit is nice as well but I feel the lugs are just a bit too small and overwhelmed by the roundness of the bezel and case. Sub C lugs though a little big are complimented by it’s heft and overall solid feel. It’ll be the ultimate to have both - I’m thinking of a 2liner no date as a great pair to keep.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 39
|
Prefer 116610......ceramic bezel looks great and scratch resistant
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 833
|
I’ve read that the 5 digit subs wear smaller due to a less bulky-looking case, but seeing them side by side on your picture makes me feel it actually wears bigger than the 6 digit? Also the later model seem more proportionate than the other.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: CH
Posts: 70
|
Elegance versus modernity. A question of taste
Gesendet von meinem SM-A405FN mit Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Juho
Location: Finland
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 1,914
|
My favorite Rolex ever made (after owning 14). Sea-Dweller 16600 is close but come on... Sub is Sub.
![]()
__________________
My Luxury Watch Reviews Blog |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Michigan
Posts: 895
|
Hey everyone, new member here. Id just like to add that the modern sub has the larger markers which was a huge selling point for me as it gives it a vintage vibe. I feel that feature is overlooked in discussion. The markers, the glidelock and the previously mentioned extra removable link made this the watch for me. I do like the ceramic too! I just love my watch lol. (only had it 2 weeks)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 23
|
Would love to see the new Ceramic Sub with narrower lugs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: BKK
Posts: 10
|
Rolex 116610 C is perfect
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Real Name: Tyler Durden
Location: Texas
Watch: Submariner 16610V
Posts: 60
|
Awesome photo! Beautiful patina on the 16610
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,202
|
I like the 5 digit case (lugs) in fact more, but the SubC bracelet beats everything.
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Traffic
Watch: DW-5600BB
Posts: 2,906
|
I prefer the 16610. I don’t like the square, maxi case on the 116610.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Luis
Location: Texas
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 1,423
|
They are both great watches....
They both feel different on the wrist! 5 digit is lighter, 6 digit is heavier I love the rehaut on the 6 there are rehauts on 5 digit, so i looked for years to find one i just prefer the 5 digit, Again both are great.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: VA
Watch: SD43
Posts: 547
|
5 digit.
The balance of the 6 digit Sub is just off to me. I really don't like the maxi case and how slim the bracelet feels coming off of it. Wore a 6 digit Sub Date for two years and had enough. If the lugs were tapered like the SD43, I most likely would have kept it. That said, the bracelet, clasp and bezel are all far better on the 6 digit models. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: SA,TX
Watch: 16570,BLNR,116610
Posts: 2,244
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: David
Location: PNW USA
Watch: utalkinbout
Posts: 379
|
6 digit- ceramic bezel FTW
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: France
Posts: 1,076
|
16610 for me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: ITALY
Watch: 16610LN - 126600
Posts: 335
|
ceramic bazel is gorgious, but I don't like the proportions of the 116610,
a little "squared". Overall, I prefer the proportions of the 16610 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 4,004
|
116610 every time for me.
__________________
RRGHOST1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,619
|
I prefer the overall aesthetics of the 5 digit. The feel and rock solid bracelet and clasp on the 6 digit is hard to ignore, and it wears better on my wrist size/shape.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Europe
Posts: 794
|
Aesthetically always the 5 digits.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: USA
Watch: 116010LN
Posts: 43
|
116610LN All day!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.