![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
#31 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 284
|
I tried on a 36 first but thought it looked lost on my wrist, so I plumped for the 40 instead.
6.75 flat top wrist
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 454
|
I have a 36 and 40 day dates. Lately wear the 36 more, 7.5 inch wrists. Both are supremely comfortable, and you won’t go wrong either way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Maryland
Watch: 118209
Posts: 697
|
36 is the classic size and proportion and will always look right, imo. The larger size was a response (already embarrassingly revised once) to a fad that will probably not age well.
I say stick to the original—the classic—the tried and true. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Singapore
Posts: 415
|
Recently tried-on a DD36 that caught my eye at the AD. It looked so good on my 6.9" wrist. The whole package was perfect: size, slate dial, rose gold, baguette diamonds.
![]() Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona-Hulk-Sub
Posts: 105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Singapore
Posts: 415
|
Quote:
I could be wrong, but do they both have the same dial diameter? The rest being made of extra spoilers like ricer cars. Honestly the DD36 looked quite massive and heavy to me. Haven't checked d the DD40 tough Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: OCMD
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 14,823
|
DD40 is basically perfection
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
2025 Rolex SubTT Bluesy Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
You can clearly pull off a 40mm watch w/o it looking like a dinner plate, no question. That watch is not too big on you. However, the DD just doesn't look right at 40mm (to me). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 284
|
Quote:
Thanks, Danny. It was also to illustrate that wrist circumference is useless to gauge whether a watch will fit correctly. The diameter is the important factor. I have a small circumference, but a wide diameter, therefore I can pull off larger lug to lug watches easier. All my own opinion of course. One man’s saucer is another man’s dinner plate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,834
|
That dial look nothing like the one on Rolex website configurator.. looks absolutely stunning in real life photo!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Home
Watch: Patek Aquanaut
Posts: 837
|
36 is classic 40 is for a pimp
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
.Even comes down to how one's wrist is rotated. When rotated outward, my wrist (assuming others' as well) flattens significantly, vs when I rotate inwards, like to check the time, it's thicker/narrower looking. It's quite analogous to watch diameter not telling the whole story, and dial-to-bezel ratio being at least as important. 40mm rotating bezel watches look "right" while (IMO) those that are mostly dial (IWC pilot pieces a good example) look huge. Same reason a YM37 wears smaller than a DJ/DD/OP36. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
2025 Rolex SubTT Bluesy Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,866
|
I agree with those here that 36 is the classic and that it’s not too small. I mean Tony Soprano and LBJ were not small men and it looked great. I just was wondering if the 40 was the more modern take with the larger size, more dial options and upgraded design, bracelet, movement, etc.I also do agree that the 40 is more flash while the 36 is the most elegant and understated Day Date maybe ever made. As I said in earlier post it has garnered some real compliments from friends who are both afficianados as well as non WIS types. Says something….
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,009
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Out west
Watch: Pt 228206 ice blue
Posts: 551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 147
|
If we are being honest, I think the 40K price difference Is the deciding factor for most? Translates to trading in a couple Rolex + Cash for the 36, vs selling the entire collection for the 41
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
2025 Rolex SubTT Bluesy Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,866
|
The money is an issue but it’s not the ‘whole’ collection but is it worth the extra money and will it have duration vs the 36 which is the original. The ROO was hit for a while and has faded will the DD 40 do the same.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.