![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Illinois
Posts: 21
|
Does this 16610 look good and real?
Hello,
I am thinking about doing a transaction. I wanted to check if this Submariner 16610 is real and if there is something that I am missing. I never knew Subs came with anchors so I was also curious about that. Also this is a Z serial with no rehaut. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,110
|
Nothing pops out to me but I’m just a guy on the Internet. Good luck.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,697
|
Looks good, but Z did not generally come with the anchor, that stopped about 1-2yrs earlier but still possible the AD may have had one to give(?).
That’s not that watches original set I don’t think. Tags and Submariner booklet and calendar’s are missing. The bezel has been polished very soft around 10 and 12-1. The crown gaurds have been softened too. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Juho
Location: Finland
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 1,914
|
Looks good to me.
__________________
My Luxury Watch Reviews Blog |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Watch: SUB LV-C/Pepsi C
Posts: 423
|
Definitely looks good and legit. Obviously can’t know about the movement without removing the caseback ultimately.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.