The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 December 2022, 01:29 PM   #1
jw3571
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 25
Daytona Height

I've been looking into Daytona's and reading a lot about how they wear small. I started looking at the dimensions and getting some conflicting info. Is it true that Datejust II is taller than a Daytona? I sold a Datejust II because it felt and looks so much smaller than my GMT's and Subs. Do Daytona's really sit lower on the wrist than the Datejust II?
jw3571 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2022, 02:00 PM   #2
SLWoodster
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: California
Watch: GMT BLNR
Posts: 1,496
Yes.

That’s kind of the charm for me.

If you get the black dial ceramic it will look larger. Basically if you get Similar color dial and bezel it will look larger. If you get yellow gold OF with black dial… If you get precious metal it will also feel larger. The rose gold and brown dial, the colors blend in together and make the watch look small. But it’s so beautiful.
SLWoodster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2022, 05:58 PM   #3
just1time
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: toRonTo, oN,
Posts: 595
Ialways thought the Daytona looks and wears big on average in pics and videos but when I finally saw one in person, I was so shocked at how small it was. And always wondered what the hype was about and why people go crazy for it.
just1time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2022, 10:36 PM   #4
Onequik135i
"TRF" Member
 
Onequik135i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,563
I don’t have the current ceramic model but did have a earlier 16520 which I eventually traded towards a 116520 (both pre ceramic models). Both certainly wear noticeably smaller when compared to a ceramic sub or gmt. I believe the case size on the Daytonas are 38.5 or so.
__________________
16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170
Onequik135i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2022, 10:54 PM   #5
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,699
Welcome to the forum

Yes the Daytona wears low on the wrist and it also wears “small” compared to other professional references. Many like that, because it’s comfortable for daily wear.
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2022, 11:02 PM   #6
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw3571 View Post
I've been looking into Daytona's and reading a lot about how they wear small. I started looking at the dimensions and getting some conflicting info. Is it true that Datejust II is taller than a Daytona? I sold a Datejust II because it felt and looks so much smaller than my GMT's and Subs. Do Daytona's really sit lower on the wrist than the Datejust II?
Do you buy the watch or do you buy the dimensions even if a few mm more or less difference either way.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2022, 11:03 PM   #7
Agamemnon
"TRF" Member
 
Agamemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Real Name: Giuliano
Location: Italy
Watch: Rolex - Panerai
Posts: 1,979
The Daytona is as it should be: perfect!
Agamemnon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2022, 11:18 PM   #8
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,445
Yup and why the Daytona is perfection on the wrist as it’s balance is why any size wrist can wear it.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 December 2022, 11:28 PM   #9
scurfa
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sunderland
Posts: 1,317
The size is why I wear mine the most out of all the watches I have, it’s perfect


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram @scurfawatches
scurfa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2022, 12:17 AM   #10
JSolution
"TRF" Member
 
JSolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,398
A datejust ii is close to a sky dweller, way bigger than a Daytona
JSolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2022, 12:29 AM   #11
Chester01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: East Coast
Watch: 16610
Posts: 4,933
I have owned both (36mm DJ) and the 116520 and the 116520 was thinner (of felt that way). I have many issues with the Daytona, but it may be the most perfectly proportioned watch I have ever owned.
Chester01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2022, 12:54 AM   #12
TheWatchmen
"TRF" Member
 
TheWatchmen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,363
More comfy and better fit IMO than the other professional models
TheWatchmen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2022, 10:26 AM   #13
Pinchy
"TRF" Member
 
Pinchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: California
Posts: 599
Rolex dimensions aren't "accurate".

the 116500LN is 38.4MM

the precious metal variants are bigger probably 39.5MM but I'll be sure to measure soooon.
Pinchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2022, 10:42 AM   #14
rockysw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 760
That is the remarkable bit to have a automatic movement of this caliber which is this thin. Even the likes of Omega's manual wound watches which are thicker than an automatic daytona.
rockysw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2022, 08:58 AM   #15
Calborn
"TRF" Member
 
Calborn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Silicon Valley
Watch: GMT, Daytonas
Posts: 174
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockysw View Post
That is the remarkable bit to have a automatic movement of this caliber which is this thin. Even the likes of Omega's manual wound watches which are thicker than an automatic daytona.

100% agreed.

It's definitely a phenomenally comfortable watch to wear daily
Calborn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2022, 09:19 AM   #16
envuks
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
envuks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 3,741
The thinness of the Daytona is noticeable compared to a gmt or sub. It definitely wears smaller all around.

I cannot comment on the comparison to a datejust myself


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Current watches: 116718ln, 116500 black dial, 40mm Breitling Chronomat MOP dial

“A man with one watch always knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.”
envuks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2022, 01:17 PM   #17
JSCP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Watch: RolexPatekCartier
Posts: 2,391
Wear smalls for sure. I have it and hardly wear as love
my rose gold better
__________________
PP5167r; PP5153r; PPNautilus 7118r; PP3733-YG;
DD40 RG/Sundust; DD40YG/White/Roman;DD40 WG/Olive;Daytona RG;Sub Black YG; Daytona Panda; Celebration 41; GMT-II’s: Left VTNR; GRNR; Batman; SkyDweller SSJubilee/Black; SUB no-date; Oysterquartz SS; DJ SS 36mm’87; Cartier-Roadster YG;Santos YG; Panther YG; Tank’73 YG,
Tank Must ‘23;BulgariBB38mm/YG
JSCP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2022, 01:28 PM   #18
inadeje
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,882
I have a 7 3/4 wrist and a few 46mm Panerai and the Yachtmaster II.

Anyone who says the Daytona is too small doesn’t own one. The watch is perfectly dimensioned, including the thickness, lug size and overall proportions. Rolex hit the ball out of the park with the design of the case and the dimensions. That's the reason why, unlike every other Rolex model since the 80s, it hasn’t been meddled with over the years and decades. The Daytona has maintained essentially the same case since the release of the zenith in 1988. 34 years of perfection.
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2022, 02:22 PM   #19
JSCP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Watch: RolexPatekCartier
Posts: 2,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by inadeje View Post
I have a 7 3/4 wrist and a few 46mm Panerai and the Yachtmaster II.

Anyone who says the Daytona is too small doesn’t own one. The watch is perfectly dimensioned, including the thickness, lug size and overall proportions. Rolex hit the ball out of the park with the design of the case and the dimensions. That's the reason why, unlike every other Rolex model since the 80s, it hasn’t been meddled with over the years and decades. The Daytona has maintained essentially the same case since the release of the zenith in 1988. 34 years of perfection.
LoL
__________________
PP5167r; PP5153r; PPNautilus 7118r; PP3733-YG;
DD40 RG/Sundust; DD40YG/White/Roman;DD40 WG/Olive;Daytona RG;Sub Black YG; Daytona Panda; Celebration 41; GMT-II’s: Left VTNR; GRNR; Batman; SkyDweller SSJubilee/Black; SUB no-date; Oysterquartz SS; DJ SS 36mm’87; Cartier-Roadster YG;Santos YG; Panther YG; Tank’73 YG,
Tank Must ‘23;BulgariBB38mm/YG
JSCP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2022, 02:31 PM   #20
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
I think the Daytona is perfectly sized and proportioned for the style and I have a large wrist. I wouldn’t get a Daytona if I was you. You thought the DJ2 was small. The Daytona will feel a lot closer on the wrist to the old Explorer 39mm than the bulkier feeling DJ2
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2022, 02:31 PM   #21
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by inadeje View Post
I have a 7 3/4 wrist and a few 46mm Panerai and the Yachtmaster II.

Anyone who says the Daytona is too small doesn’t own one. The watch is perfectly dimensioned, including the thickness, lug size and overall proportions. Rolex hit the ball out of the park with the design of the case and the dimensions. That's the reason why, unlike every other Rolex model since the 80s, it hasn’t been meddled with over the years and decades. The Daytona has maintained essentially the same case since the release of the zenith in 1988. 34 years of perfection.
Said perfectly. Well done
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2022, 02:47 PM   #22
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,889
Daytona Height

I always felt that my old Platona wore heavy…

Beautiful, but heavy.

Have had several over the years - SS, TT, YG, & Pt. - all worked well for me.

I stopped comparing sizes after I left grade school FWIW.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2022, 03:07 PM   #23
subprimero
"TRF" Member
 
subprimero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Texas
Watch: 14060
Posts: 3,434
The Daytona is traditionally sized. Unless you have an enormous wrist it will be fine.
Light colored dials will cause the watch to appear to be larger, so if your worried about size stick with them.
subprimero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2022, 01:12 PM   #24
Cauhauna
"TRF" Member
 
Cauhauna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Cau
Location: Peachtree City
Watch: 116500
Posts: 766
the daytona is perfect

anyone who thinks it is too small is breitling trash or is trying to justify not paying the money for it

either way, good luck





Quote:
Originally Posted by inadeje View Post
I have a 7 3/4 wrist and a few 46mm Panerai and the Yachtmaster II.

Anyone who says the Daytona is too small doesn’t own one. The watch is perfectly dimensioned, including the thickness, lug size and overall proportions. Rolex hit the ball out of the park with the design of the case and the dimensions. That's the reason why, unlike every other Rolex model since the 80s, it hasn’t been meddled with over the years and decades. The Daytona has maintained essentially the same case since the release of the zenith in 1988. 34 years of perfection.
agree
__________________
116610LN | 226570 Polar | 326934 Blue | 116500 White
2FA Enabled
Cauhauna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.