|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
| Yes, no issues |
   
|
1,098 | 69.32% |
| No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
  
|
63 | 3.98% |
| No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
  
|
423 | 26.70% |
| Voters: 1584. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
27 March 2023, 05:28 PM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Ireland
Posts: 392
|
Cals 4131 (Daytona), 9002 (Skydweller), Cal 7140 (New 1908) are all Chronergy escapements now. Seems to me Rolex have faith in this escapement design. Let's see if these will behave differently to the 32xx movements.
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (1 members and 2 guests) | |
| Gerardus |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Threaded Mode