ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

benderschweiz · 2 November 2023, 03:38 AM

Looking at a Maxi V 5513 from 84 full set on tropicalwatch. Insert and hands look correct to me. The case has been touched up but looks like there is a small area of corrosion between the lugs. Could that be removed or would that be to risky with the engraving? Also is the box/anchor/hang tag correct for Submariners from this time? Seems priced at a premium but would be cool to have correct box and accessories along with papers and the watch.

[IMG]

[/IMG]
https://ibb.co/6r37g00
[IMG]

[/IMG]
https://ibb.co/nbLW8L6
[IMG]

[/IMG]
https://ibb.co/kyVtNWz

TuRo · 2 November 2023, 03:46 AM

Leave others to comment on the watch.
Quick look on the paraphernalia....

The translation should be printed 84 inside first page in green - btw first year of translation booklet I think prior to that a sheet)

The very rare white writing on bottom sub book hopefully is correct 84 (showing matte 5513....the later 86 white writing book would show an incorrect 5513/0 gloss with WGS btw)

Should have 84 white writing Your Oyster book too...(both should be printed USA last page)

The non hologram Seal is correct (hologram from circa 86/87)....BUT it's not a C.O.S.C watch like a 5512 is, so it's actually erroneous to the watch but worth £100 !!!

Stringed anchor, and the correct vinyl wallet and calender

US papers (different no of dot stamps to EU for each letter/number) - btw looks like a 6 not 8 on poor photo... but I'm sure it's an 8 (8.5 million rough switch to gloss WGS btw)

Correct US 2 fold non-cosc (eg not 3 fold cosc) Papers match the US bufkor box (no cushion !?) , but the papers are not dealer stamped of course.

Dan S · 2 November 2023, 04:54 AM

You are not likely to see the corrosion between the lugs with the bracelet installed.

MotoJoe · 2 November 2023, 10:45 AM

That box looks identical to the one that came with my ‘84. I do not have a box insert but only the pillow. Also mine is a WG spider dial for what it’s worth. Beautiful looking watch to my untrained eyes.

Filipão · 2 November 2023, 12:50 PM

That's a belter.

Case is in outstanding condition, rust is not an issue.

Go for it, whatever and in whichever way box and papers were put together, if they were.

2 November 2023, 03:38 AM	#1
benderschweiz "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2019 Location: Ohio Posts: 16	Opinions on 5513 from 84 Looking at a Maxi V 5513 from 84 full set on tropicalwatch. Insert and hands look correct to me. The case has been touched up but looks like there is a small area of corrosion between the lugs. Could that be removed or would that be to risky with the engraving? Also is the box/anchor/hang tag correct for Submariners from this time? Seems priced at a premium but would be cool to have correct box and accessories along with papers and the watch. [IMG][/IMG] https://ibb.co/6r37g00 [IMG][/IMG] https://ibb.co/nbLW8L6 [IMG][/IMG] https://ibb.co/kyVtNWz

2 November 2023, 03:46 AM	#2
TuRo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2022 Real Name: Paul Location: Cantabrigia - G.B Watch: ing the detectives Posts: 2,807	Leave others to comment on the watch. Quick look on the paraphernalia.... The translation should be printed 84 inside first page in green - btw first year of translation booklet I think prior to that a sheet) The very rare white writing on bottom sub book hopefully is correct 84 (showing matte 5513....the later 86 white writing book would show an incorrect 5513/0 gloss with WGS btw) Should have 84 white writing Your Oyster book too...(both should be printed USA last page) The non hologram Seal is correct (hologram from circa 86/87)....BUT it's not a C.O.S.C watch like a 5512 is, so it's actually erroneous to the watch but worth £100 !!! Stringed anchor, and the correct vinyl wallet and calender US papers (different no of dot stamps to EU for each letter/number) - btw looks like a 6 not 8 on poor photo... but I'm sure it's an 8 (8.5 million rough switch to gloss WGS btw) Correct US 2 fold non-cosc (eg not 3 fold cosc) Papers match the US bufkor box (no cushion !?) , but the papers are not dealer stamped of course. __________________ Thieves and fools and long travelled soldiers, A candid light exposes their homes. Human falter, people bellowed from their homes. And houses, there's fools and long reigning pharaohs. IT BITES - Yellow Christian

2 November 2023, 04:54 AM	#3
Dan S 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2018 Location: Colorado, USA Posts: 6,252	You are not likely to see the corrosion between the lugs with the bracelet installed. __________________ @oldwatchdan on IG

2 November 2023, 10:45 AM	#4
MotoJoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: FL Posts: 21	That box looks identical to the one that came with my ‘84. I do not have a box insert but only the pillow. Also mine is a WG spider dial for what it’s worth. Beautiful looking watch to my untrained eyes.

2 November 2023, 12:50 PM	#5
Filipão "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Real Name: Filipe Location: Lisbon & Wadesdah Watch: Never too many Posts: 1,898	That's a belter. Case is in outstanding condition, rust is not an issue. Go for it, whatever and in whichever way box and papers were put together, if they were.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)