Daytona Subdials

[Onikage]

Originally Posted by Helmi

To be frank, I don't care what he buys, I just listen to his opinion from technical design criticism point of view and I find his points valid. It seems that he is an interior designer or so that is why he cares about tiny matters that no one else notice

It doesn't have any bearing that he seemingly hasn't even handled the watches he slams in favour of their £60 'counterparts'? I don't mean to be an ass but you can't buy a 'bagelsport nautilus' and a 'didun design Royal One?' or any of this stuff - the likes of which you can find identical on aliexpress complete with the fake logo included and claim that they have fixed flaws in the original design and be taken seriously. Imo.

[Actor07]

Originally Posted by Devildog

Its been like that since Rolex replaced the Zenith movement with the in house 4130 movement.

A design "feauture" of the 4130

And the 4131. As an aside, I like the current placement of the subdials, if the sundials are equidistant between the 10 and 8 and 2 and 4 hour markers, both subdials would be too close to the seconds subdial at 6 o'clock. If altered, you may lose the red "Daytona" on top of the seconds subdial and make the whole dial appear bottom heavy.