Next watch purchase?

[Gunnersaurus]

Currently have a Sub Date (116610LN) that I purchased from my AD in 2019 and at the time also put my name down for GMT II 126710BLRO which I've never received the call for, but do occassionally still visit the AD (wishful thinking).

Fast forward, I've grown impatient and have decided I'm going to go grey but after visiting a few dealers I've had my head turned by the Daytona white dial. If I go the Daytona route it would be the 116500LN as I can't justify paying £5,000 more for the newer reference. Now I'm not sure if I should go for the BLRO which I've always coveted or the Daytona.

I'm interested to hear what people would choose both in terms of aesthetics and use and also value?

I don't believe in buying watches for investment, but always good to know the majority of your money is safe in these pieces.

[pearson1995]

The two most popular sports watches probably the Daytona white dial and BLRO.

For variety with the sub I’d get the Daytona. And the 116500 imo is nicer anyway.

You could long term sell the sub and get a BLRO. That would be an amazing two watch combo. Or keep the sub and add the BLRO. The colour and bracelet give enough variety.

[Bazil]

If you got either I don’t believe you’d be disappointed ..
Daytona fits differently to a GMT ..
I own a Sprite and Panda, the panda feels so good on ..
BLRO I was in for, but tried on and was very disappointed in the Bezel colours, they just looked dark and quite uninspiring ..
Daytona feels like a classy watch and looks good on with anything, dress up dress down …

[Gunnersaurus]

Originally Posted by pearson1995

The two most popular sports watches probably the Daytona white dial and BLRO.

For variety with the sub I’d get the Daytona. And the 116500 imo is nicer anyway.

You could long term sell the sub and get a BLRO. That would be an amazing two watch combo. Or keep the sub and add the BLRO. The colour and bracelet give enough variety.

I definitely won't sell the Sub, it is my first Rolex and I used some inheritance money I received from my parents who died young so defintely has sentimental value.

[Bazil]

BLRO looks good in photo, but on it felt very dull and lacklustre that’s just how I found it, Daytona on the other hand feels so special on ..

[Gunnersaurus]

Originally Posted by Bazil

BLRO looks good in photo, but on it felt very dull and lacklustre that’s just how I found it, Daytona on the other hand feels so special on ..

When I tried it on the BLRO at a grey dealer I did really like, but i get wgar you mean about it being a little dull. I thought the colors would pop a little more which is why I think I've had my head turned by the Daytona!

If only I could afford both right now, but I'm sure I'll add which ever one I don't get down the line.

[pearson1995]

Originally Posted by Gunnersaurus

I definitely won't sell the Sub, it is my first Rolex and I used some inheritance money I received from my parents who died young so defintely has sentimental value.

Well in that case I would say do everything you can to never sell that watch. Sentimental value is obviously worth more. Sorry for your loss.

A Daytona and Sub imo give you the most variety. Different colour dials, functions etc. good luck.

[2000-NJDEVILS]

Daytona. 116520. Under $18K is your best value.

[GMTmatt]

Have you had a chronograph before? I always wanted one and when I finally got a chronograph, realized it was not for me.

[Gunnersaurus]

Originally Posted by GMTmatt

Have you had a chronograph before? I always wanted one and when I finally got a chronograph, realized it was not for me.

I had a Tag Forumla 1 chronograph years ago which was my first watch. I did use the chronograph, but kind of just moved beyond Tag’s

[AK797]

Funny you've gone off the watch with blue/Man City v red/Arsenal ... you've not given up on the League have you and gone all Spursy/White Daytona.

[nathanjones05]

Have you tried both on? If you haven't I would suggest that as it will probably help make your mind up. Both awesome watches but you may instantly fall in love with one.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by Gunnersaurus

When I tried it on the BLRO at a grey dealer I did really like, but i get wgar you mean about it being a little dull. I thought the colors would pop a little more which is why I think I've had my head turned by the Daytona!

If only I could afford both right now, but I'm sure I'll add which ever one I don't get down the line.

You have to get the watch out of the AD lighting and into natural light to appreciate its beauty







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Gunnersaurus]

Originally Posted by brandrea

You have to get the watch out of the AD lighting and into natural light to appreciate its beauty







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Looks stunning in those pictures 👌

[watchwatcher]

I think it's more a question of which one you're going to get first.

For me, I always choose the hardest task I'm facing, as opposed to leaving it to the end.

[Easy E]

I wanted a 116500 white from the moment i first saw one. Finally got it and realized the pictures are a lie. So many lighting conditions that make the watch hard to read. I couldn't get rid of it fast enough. Get the BLRO. Plus you are looking at one watch that goes for 2x retail and the other for 3x. There is no "value" in this deal, only a watch you like and no more wait.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by Gunnersaurus

Looks stunning in those pictures

The modern BLRO (at least mine) looks best in natural low light IMHO.

Luckily is spend a lot of time in the car and dimly lit restaurants


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[worldofoyster]

get the pepsi in oyster, best in both worlds

[SS Oyster]

I like the Daytona more, but fortunately got mine at retail. I'm not sure if either are worth their secondary market prices, so can't give you advice. Only you can decide if either are worth the price you would have to pay to get one now vs. waiting on the AD.

[1William]

I have owned multiples of the Daytona-C and the BLRO. The value of the Daytona in the secondary market makes it a difficult buy for me. The SS Daytona is a flex watch and sits atop the pile for Rolex in that regard in my opinion. The BLRO on Jubilee is the one for me. Something about the colors, the bracelet and the fit that make it one of my favorites. The Daytona's are gone and the BLRO is still here. If you really want a cool white dial Chronograph get the new Omega Speedmaster with the white dial. Save 20K and have a watch that you can actually read. Just my thoughts.

[rolexboy66]

Originally Posted by Gunnersaurus

When I tried it on the BLRO at a grey dealer I did really like, but i get wgar you mean about it being a little dull. I thought the colors would pop a little more which is why I think I've had my head turned by the Daytona!

If only I could afford both right now, but I'm sure I'll add which ever one I don't get down the line.

Hi OP, the Pepsi u tried could be an older model Mk1 or MK2 where colours are more dull. If u get the MK3, the colours are more vibrant (darker blue and red) and def pops.

Owning both the 116 white and Pepsi, and probably been in a similar situation as you, I’d probably go for Pepsi first. It’s a darn beautiful watch and experience on the wrist besides being cheaper than panda. You can slowly upgrade, all the best!

[Madman37]

daytona black dial all the way. Went and tried on PEPSI in grey market stores did not get what the fuss was about as people said very dull

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by 1William

I have owned multiples of the Daytona-C and the BLRO. The value of the Daytona in the secondary market makes it a difficult buy for me. The SS Daytona is a flex watch and sits atop the pile for Rolex in that regard in my opinion. The BLRO on Jubilee is the one for me. Something about the colors, the bracelet and the fit that make it one of my favorites. The Daytona's are gone and the BLRO is still here. If you really want a cool white dial Chronograph get the new Omega Speedmaster with the white dial. Save 20K and have a watch that you can actually read. Just my thoughts.

Congratulations William

[B2 Stealth]

I am not a Daytona fan--too cluttered, useless for my life, wears small and no date window. BLRO is my favorite model so easy choice.

[Nads786]

Originally Posted by brandrea

You have to get the watch out of the AD lighting and into natural light to appreciate its beauty







Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I really agree with this specifically to the BLNR. I think the watch looks so much better in natural light vs. jewelry light. I'm sure the BLRO would be similar.

[macluven]

I have the SS Daytona with the white dial and a TT Daytona with a white dial, both earlier references, and the BLNR.

The Daytona was my grail watch, but I find myself not wearing either of them that much. Oddly enough, when I reach for a watch, it's always been for a Sub or the BLNR.

I do want the BLRO but the colors are always off for me. I have a darker skin tone so the BLNR suits me perfectly.

Between the Daytona or BLRO, I would choose the BLRO. The Daytona is a great watch, but I don't use the subdials at all nor the tach scale on the bezel. The GMT function of the BLRO is way more useful and it has a date function where the Daytona doesn't.