The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 August 2024, 04:46 AM   #1
texan_guy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT II & Explorer2
Posts: 54
Really Like my Polar 216570 but

it feels a bit too weighty on my wrist. The bracelet fit is fine, just the weight feels a little much. My 16760 GMT Master 2 fits perfectly and never moves around when wearing it. I'm considering selling it and getting a 126610LV Submariner. It's a millimeter less in size than the Explorer and I love the look of it.

Any opinions?
texan_guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2024, 04:52 AM   #2
WatchTimes
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
WatchTimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
You do what you want to do...
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman

Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun
WatchTimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2024, 04:57 AM   #3
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,639
If the Explorer II isn't comfortable to wear there's no point in keeping it. I find my 216570 sits really nicely on my arm and feels more like a 40mm. Best fit and comfort of all for me is the 126710 on Jubilee. My 11 series Sub fits nearly as well but the clasp is long and feels borderline awkward. The clasp on the 1266 looks too long for me but I haven't tried one.
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2024, 04:57 AM   #4
soho
2024 Pledge Member
 
soho's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Varies
Posts: 2,057
Have you tried a 16570? You might like it better, given that you like the 5 digit GMT.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
soho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2024, 05:35 AM   #5
Roddypeepa
"TRF" Member
 
Roddypeepa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,678
Interesting because lots of threads about explorer ii/seadweller etc lately.

I find the 6 digit explorer ii ok but maybe try a 5 digit if you
Like the basic watch. It’s smaller and lighter obviously.

But don’t keep it if you don’t like wearing it. That’s a no - brainer


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roddypeepa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2024, 07:18 AM   #6
SubDate
"TRF" Member
 
SubDate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: New Hampshire USA
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 139
A 126610LV Submariner is not going to solve that. That 1 less mm will not prevent it from rotating toward the outside of the wrist. I have a LN and it has a bit of heft to it. I would recommend a 5 series. Just my 2 cents.
SubDate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2024, 07:25 AM   #7
faz
"TRF" Member
 
faz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Faz
Location: California
Watch: like'em all
Posts: 4,689
My 2 cents: 216570 is easier to wear than 126610 would be. If you are not happy with this, you won't be happy with that.

5 digit explorer2's are amazing. Any 5 digit case is a easy daily wearer.
__________________
-Faz

Instagram @fazmoto
faz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2024, 07:33 AM   #8
rohada
"TRF" Member
 
rohada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: NC
Posts: 408
Quote:
Originally Posted by soho View Post
Have you tried a 16570? You might like it better, given that you like the 5 digit GMT.
I wanted a few old school tool watches and one of them is a 1999 16570 polar and I love it. I did put in a Steel Reef on the fly extension link due to the size of my wrist. I use that link in the half position. The 40mm is a better fit for me. YMMV. Good luck to you.
__________________
♛Explorer II 16570 | ♛Submariner 14060M | ♛SDDS 116660 | ♛GMT Master II 126710BLRO | ♛Daytona 116503
rohada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2024, 08:46 AM   #9
texan_guy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT II & Explorer2
Posts: 54
I guess I'll need to go "exploring" for that 5 digit Explorer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SubDate View Post
A 126610LV Submariner is not going to solve that. That 1 less mm will not prevent it from rotating toward the outside of the wrist. I have a LN and it has a bit of heft to it. I would recommend a 5 series. Just my 2 cents.
Thanks. This is some of the feedback I was hoping to hear.
texan_guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2024, 10:46 AM   #10
Jackie Daytona
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Jackie Daytona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 6,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by soho View Post
Have you tried a 16570? You might like it better, given that you like the 5 digit GMT.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My thoughts exactly.

That was one of the issues that I had with my 216570 as well. I’ve been much happier with my 16570 so far.

The 22 series fixed the rest of the issues I had but the size/balance thing I don’t feel would be quite right still.
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 16570 | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV
Jackie Daytona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2024, 11:32 AM   #11
Barada7
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Rhode Island
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 431
The best advice I’ve gotten here: Add before you subtract.
Barada7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2024, 12:06 AM   #12
stevestil
"TRF" Member
 
stevestil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Real Name: Steve
Location: NYC
Posts: 904
I had the same thoughts regarding the polar exp II. Ended up parting with it. No rAgrets


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stevestil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2024, 01:51 AM   #13
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,369
I found my 216570 (polar) less than comfortable and traded it in on a 226570 (black) which is much improved. That extra millimeter of bracelet width makes a significant difference where it lands on my wrist and the subsequent distribution of its weight.
Kevin of Larchmont is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2024, 02:07 AM   #14
rmagoo57
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rmagoo57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Ron
Location: Detroitish
Watch: GMT II/Sub/Exp II
Posts: 2,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barada7 View Post
The best advice I’ve gotten here: Add before you subtract.
Agreed. Loved the 22 but just not as comfortable as the 5-digit. I now have both 16570's.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg exp 2 duo sm.jpg (153.3 KB, 163 views)
rmagoo57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2024, 04:35 AM   #15
daysky1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 431
Quote:
Originally Posted by texan_guy View Post
it feels a bit too weighty on my wrist. The bracelet fit is fine, just the weight feels a little much. My 16760 GMT Master 2 fits perfectly and never moves around when wearing it. I'm considering selling it and getting a 126610LV Submariner. It's a millimeter less in size than the Explorer and I love the look of it.

Any opinions?
You might want to try getting a rubber b or a Everest rubber strap you will notice a significant loss of weight in the feel on your wrist. I used a rubber b for my Submariner date and it feels so light it's really comfortable now not that it wasn't before but it's just so much lighter it's very much a different feel.
daysky1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.