The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Yesterday, 02:01 PM   #61
CaptT
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texans93 View Post
Couldn’t be happier! Thanks OP…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Congrats. Looks fantastic!
CaptT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 02:03 PM   #62
CaptT
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave O View Post
Thanks for sharing. Looks great!
Thanks, Dave. I believe we owe it all to you!
CaptT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:47 PM   #63
inadeje
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,883
That sounds perfect OP. Thanks for the informative post.
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:54 PM   #64
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,566
Looks great.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20240916_155055 (002).jpg (73.5 KB, 0 views)
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:10 PM   #65
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptT View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texans93 View Post
Attachment 1469153
Attachment 1469154
Attachment 1469155
Attachment 1469156
Couldn’t be happier! Thanks OP…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Love seeing these examples. They look great!
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:46 PM   #66
Dave O
"TRF" Member
 
Dave O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Northern CA - USA
Posts: 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptT View Post
Thanks, Dave. I believe we owe it all to you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by inadeje View Post
That sounds perfect OP. Thanks for the informative post.
Thanks guys. Glad I could help. Hopefully some day Tudor will offer the watch with a 5 link option. Until then, at least we have this option.
Dave O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:22 AM   #67
CaptT
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 556
One thing to keep in mind, is that there are differences between the oval 5-link bracelet that comes with the new Tudor Chrono Blue (and Pink, I believe), and the 5-link T-Fit bracelet from the BB 41 that several here (myself included) have swapped in on the GMT, Harrods, etc.

The links on the oval bracelet are just that (oval), whereas the 5-link T-Fit BB 41 are flat on the bottom. This does not impact comfort, nor is it that noticeable, when on the wrist.

More obvious to me though is that the oval 5-link bracelet has a greater taper from the lugs to the clasp, and as a result is 1-2 mm narrower at the clasp. So in that sense it wears slightly differently. Not sure if this has been called out previously. It’s minor, but we know how these minor differences can matter. 😉
CaptT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:24 AM   #68
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptT View Post
One thing to keep in mind, is that there are differences between the oval 5-link bracelet that comes with the new Tudor Chrono Blue (and Pink, I believe), and the 5-link T-Fit bracelet from the BB 41 that several here (myself included) have swapped in on the GMT, Harrods, etc.

The links on the oval bracelet are just that (oval), whereas the 5-link T-Fit BB 41 are flat on the bottom. This does not impact comfort, nor is it that noticeable, when on the wrist.

More obvious to me though is that the oval 5-link bracelet has a greater taper from the lugs to the clasp, and as a result is 1-2 mm narrower at the clasp. So in that sense it wears slightly differently. Not sure if this has been called out previously. It’s minor, but we know how these minor differences can matter. 😉
Good intel! The little details make all the difference.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:46 AM   #69
CaptT
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Pierce View Post
Good intel! The little details make all the difference.
dP
Ha so true!

Here’s to Tudor making T-fit more widely available, and on Oyster style in addition to the 5-link.
CaptT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 10:29 AM   #70
Dave O
"TRF" Member
 
Dave O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Northern CA - USA
Posts: 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptT View Post
One thing to keep in mind, is that there are differences between the oval 5-link bracelet that comes with the new Tudor Chrono Blue (and Pink, I believe), and the 5-link T-Fit bracelet from the BB 41 that several here (myself included) have swapped in on the GMT, Harrods, etc.

The links on the oval bracelet are just that (oval), whereas the 5-link T-Fit BB 41 are flat on the bottom. This does not impact comfort, nor is it that noticeable, when on the wrist.

More obvious to me though is that the oval 5-link bracelet has a greater taper from the lugs to the clasp, and as a result is 1-2 mm narrower at the clasp. So in that sense it wears slightly differently. Not sure if this has been called out previously. It’s minor, but we know how these minor differences can matter. 😉
Good info. Thanks for the update.
Dave O is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.