The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 November 2024, 10:37 AM   #31
bradyb
"TRF" Member
 
bradyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Brady
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: GMT
Posts: 976
Quote:
Originally Posted by ct79 View Post
I was on the list since October 2023 and no sign of one being offered to me, even though I bought before at that store and that chain. had myself taken off the list some two weeks ago after I could take a look at it besides watching videos about it. Reason is: Rolex ruined the dial design by putting a 40 mm date movement into a 42 mm dial. The first 6 digit reference, which I own in black, has a proper bigger 3187 movement to make the date wheel be properly aligned. The same problem exists for the Panerai quarantaquattro submersibles. Movement is too small for the dial. I look at both watches and cannot convince myself to like it. So will not spend money on it.
I've seen a few watches where the movement doesn't fit the case but this isn't one of them.
bradyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 02:50 PM   #32
EdwardC
2024 Pledge Member
 
EdwardC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Pacific
Posts: 3,595
It's surprisingly mute/unshinny as most parts of the watch is not polished. Glad to pick it up.
EdwardC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 03:10 PM   #33
Ukkanhifi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: TX
Posts: 89
This is a fantastic alt watch to the traditional subs and DJs but the size is a put off for most. Unless you have a large wrist this is a no go for most. The earlier version in 40mm is much more palatable. If you can sport the size and readily available at the AD this is a great watch.
Ukkanhifi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 06:50 PM   #34
Daveh777
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 221
Agree with the comments. The Polar is a great choice and also extremely legible - sometimes an overlooked feature.
Daveh777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:41 PM   #35
Rolexforthewin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Far far away!
Posts: 328
I’ve been after one for three years and get my hands on one.
Rolexforthewin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:35 PM   #36
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 592
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMGoodnight369 View Post
Funny enough I just picked mine up today! It was kind of a surprise. My wife reached out to my SA on Sunday and I picked it up. So a 3 day wait. I have to say this reference is a complete sleeper. I was one of the anti 42mm explorer guys until I finally tried one on. While the previous 42mm version felt like a behemoth this one wears surprisingly well. Not much a difference compared to a sub, but definitely more hefty than a GMT II
Nice pick up!. I’m thinking about adding one. Would you say the Sub or Exp II is more comfortable? Appreciate your feedback.
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 02:09 AM   #37
JMGoodnight369
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Georgia USA
Posts: 373
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTX View Post
Nice pick up!. I’m thinking about adding one. Would you say the Sub or Exp II is more comfortable? Appreciate your feedback.

That’s a tough one to answer because I think it varies from wrist to wrist and which variation of the sub you’re talking about. The newest polar is ever so slightly bigger than the 12 series sub to me. It wears very similar though. I’d say the polar sits a little more flush with the flatter case back. It feels thinner even thought it’s a little thicker on paper. I think it might be a tad heavier than the sub as well. Just more of an overall wrist presence over all but nothing compared to say a SD43


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JMGoodnight369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 02:47 AM   #38
Roddypeepa
"TRF" Member
 
Roddypeepa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTX View Post
Nice pick up!. I’m thinking about adding one. Would you say the Sub or Exp II is more comfortable? Appreciate your feedback.

Nothing in it for me. Neither is uncomfortable 95 per cent of the time but they are fairly big chicks of steel. Getting the polar fitted properly is key. Less so with sub because of glidelock. Neither as comfortable as a gmt on jubilee but not a lot in it at all.
Just add the caveat that as long as your wrist is the right size for it.

Polar way more legible though. Probably most legible watch they make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roddypeepa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 04:51 AM   #39
luk4s83
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: US
Posts: 89
Waiting for over a year to get one, inquired four AD's in my state. I don't even know what to say, it's ridiculous. Would that mean all of them are sketchy, feeding grey market with their allocations?
luk4s83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 09:19 AM   #40
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 592
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMGoodnight369 View Post
That’s a tough one to answer because I think it varies from wrist to wrist and which variation of the sub you’re talking about. The newest polar is ever so slightly bigger than the 12 series sub to me. It wears very similar though. I’d say the polar sits a little more flush with the flatter case back. It feels thinner even thought it’s a little thicker on paper. I think it might be a tad heavier than the sub as well. Just more of an overall wrist presence over all but nothing compared to say a SD43


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you for the input :-)
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 09:20 AM   #41
OTX
"TRF" Member
 
OTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roddypeepa View Post
Nothing in it for me. Neither is uncomfortable 95 per cent of the time but they are fairly big chicks of steel. Getting the polar fitted properly is key. Less so with sub because of glidelock. Neither as comfortable as a gmt on jubilee but not a lot in it at all.
Just add the caveat that as long as your wrist is the right size for it.

Polar way more legible though. Probably most legible watch they make.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you for the input :-)
OTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (2 members and 1 guests)
gerry100 , AvgChameleon

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.