Gold vs Stainless

[Devildog]

This thread needs a pic

I’ve had this for nearly 2 years now. Bezel was unmarked when I got it. I’m generally pretty careful with my watches and whilst ii think it still looks great, under bright lights or sunlight it’s clear that the bezel in particular is covered in micro swirls and fine scratches when viewed closely. Although I would say that the marks between the 85 and 70 markers in this picture are mostly dust and a thumb print since washed off)

None of which, however, takes anything away from the pleasure of wearing it





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[geoach]

Originally Posted by espanol

+1

As I get older I realize how taxing modern Rolex watches can be on the wrist. Having recently bought a 14270 Explorer 1, the (lack of) weight in Rolex of old wears much more comfortable IMO. Wouldn't enjoy wearing super case solid gold every day.

+2

[1st amg]

Love the feel and look of any gold pieces. Just something special.

[Calatrava r]

Your gold model has PCLs which show the scratches more than the brushed finish of the Sub. All Rolexes scratch and from my experience more so than any other brand.

[mato123]

Originally Posted by Calatrava r

All Rolexes scratch and from my experience more so than any other brand.

It's because 904L steel (that Rolex uses) is softer than 316L steel (that most of the brands use).

[PenDelicate]

OP, avoid gold at all costs.

Here's my daily since last April:
20250130_112859d by Tom Kennedy, on Flickr

Bezel completely destroyed by scratches, as is the case though you can't see it clearly here. Bracelet? Just look at it! It's a mess. Ravaged by micro-scratches, dings, dongs and warpings.

Folks, I know the economy isn't the best right now, but please - please - find a little compassion and donate generously to Sufferers From Swirls: www.paypal.com/SufferersFromSwirls

No one should have to live with this shame.

Sufferers From Swirls: because steel friends care ...

[kilyung]

Did someone say gold? I prefer wearing gold over steel - have for many years.

[Joearch]

Certainly room for all in my collection. Love PM and SS. Stopped looking too closely at my watches years ago.

[BraveBold]

.

[BraveBold]

Originally Posted by mato123

It's because 904L steel (that Rolex uses) is softer than 316L steel (that most of the brands use).

This is incorrect / an oversimplification.

[gerry100]

Originally Posted by BraveBold

This is incorrect / an oversimplification.

was in the SS business many moons ago, but remember enough to agree with you on oversimplification, different grades of SS have different combinations of properties

[BraveBold]

Originally Posted by gerry100

was in the SS business many moons ago, but remember enough to agree with you on oversimplification, different grades of SS have different combinations of properties

Not to mention different methods to grade hardness and (as you allude to) different final characteristics within a category.

[ratty]

Originally Posted by mike morris

extra 100g on wrist everyday ? not for me.

I agree. I don’t need an anchor on wrist to remind me what I’m wearing.

[ratty]

Originally Posted by GotRolex

You won’t go back once you go PM. Speaking from experiences.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Speaking from experience, I don’t find this at all.

I can understand if you like wearing gold coloured watches over SS coloured ones for whatever reason, but I usually wear my SS watches rather than my WG one.

It’s to the point that I’m thinking of selling my WG Daytona because it never get worn now.

[IS2000]

My 30 year old SS watches are holding up much better than any of my PM watches with similar uses. The yellow gold also developed patinas over the years. Nowadays, I love wearing grade 5 titanium watches. They are even more scratch resistant than some of the best SS watches. Also the lack of weight is a plus for me.