ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
Yesterday, 02:57 PM | #121 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,883
|
My Wife wears a beautiful 125 yo diamond engagement ring originally worn by my grandmother. The size and quality of the diamonds in it are nothing special and I would venture to say that whatever intrinsic 'value' the ring has lies solely in it's curiosity value as an antique piece. For my Wife (and I) however, it is rightly a treasured item that represents something entirely different. It will of course, be passed down to the next generation. Diamonds are common as glass and the most price-inflated item on the planet (after maybe Rolex) The 'value' is all in the eye (and heart) of the beholder.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..." |
Yesterday, 07:38 PM | #122 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,801
|
Quote:
My wife wears a 3.5ct solitaire lab diamond. It’s insane, and it’s not expensive. She wanted something large, laughed at the price of a natural diamond so she got a lab. The color is way too good for $10,000. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Today, 12:03 AM | #123 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: SD43
Posts: 3,451
|
lab grown diamonds
I don’t mind lab grown at all. Heck the divorce rate is between 40-50% in America for first time marriages. You spend 40k on a mined diamond and you get divorced its value is now 10k.
Get engaged with the lab grown …if you make it to 10yr anniversary get the mined diamond. Tangentially, I wondered how this affects the ADs who require a bundle of high margin diamonds? Mined diamonds just aren’t sexy anymore Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.