ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 September 2009, 02:36 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,418
|
The watch Rolex should make
Rolex should make a service free automatic watch.
When I bought my 1st Rolex as a teenager I remember the salesman saying it will last a lifetime if I take care of it.That was 25 years ago and its still looking good.I had it serviced for the 1st time a few years ago so I am good for a while I hope. Now if the car industry can make a car go 100k miles before a tuneup dont you think Rolex can make a watch that can go 50 years without a service? Its all about money I guess.I bought my GMT for around 1k and now they are around 6k a service than was around $100 now $600 I think its about time they make an automatic watch that doesnt need a service.
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting |
18 September 2009, 02:50 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Justin
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: TT Diamond DJ
Posts: 2,809
|
almost like sealed transmissions?? ....I mean yes...a car will go that long..but the oil still needs changing..i think a better comparison would be a car that went 100k without needing an oil change...belts...gaskets...hoses...because when a watch is serviced...thats the same gig...gaskets...lubrication, etc..
|
18 September 2009, 03:01 AM | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
Quote:
|
|
18 September 2009, 03:15 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: daytona beach
Watch: YG Yachtmaster II
Posts: 70
|
I forget the numbers, but I thought an "average" rolex balance "turn" through thousands of miles a year. i thought it was like 3-4 thousand miles. But that's a constant "pace" (assuming the watch stays wound year long).
pretty good considering the tolerances, etc. But I am lawyer not an engineer, dammit Jim! I wonder about some the UN "freak" watches and the newer watches with different material - i think JL has some watches with newer composite materials which don't require oils? How often do they need to be serviced! |
18 September 2009, 03:24 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Ian
Location: canada
Posts: 1,724
|
Ahh, but remember, it is in the industries interest to have regular service intervals, they make a great deal of money from it, keeps people in the loop as well!
|
18 September 2009, 03:36 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: 4Q
Location: Nowhere near you
Watch: 169622, 124060
Posts: 2,014
|
Quote:
A service every 5 years like clockwork (pun intended) has always suited me just fine.
__________________
One should endeavor to do what is right not what is established. |
|
18 September 2009, 03:41 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
I think the only way that could be possible would be to develop an entirely frictionless movement with a lubricant that never dried - I think that may be beyond even Rolex's capabilities for a while yet
|
18 September 2009, 05:42 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Ron
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 374
|
Doesn't someone make a watch that's oil filled, seems as if that should last quite long time.
__________________
Time is precious, regulate it with class. |
18 September 2009, 05:49 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: West Coast, US
Posts: 1,079
|
If I'm not mistaken, Sinn has a new movement that has a "hassle-free" oil. I don't >
remember what it's called, but there it is. Go to watchbuys.com, the web site for their US AD. You'll see.
Quote:
__________________
Brandon |
|
18 September 2009, 05:49 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
grand seiko 9f quartz movements have a 50 year service interval. the important stuff is hermetically sealed, i believe.
|
18 September 2009, 05:58 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
Just because you are Greek-American...I agree..
|
18 September 2009, 06:16 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: fort wayne IN
Watch: Patek 1909003
Posts: 2,176
|
Wow can't wait the day i see that happen.
|
18 September 2009, 10:20 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: DC
Watch: SD 126600
Posts: 195
|
There will never be a maintenance-free mechanism. Maybe the length of between-service intervals will evolve, but a periodic maintenance will always be required.
|
18 September 2009, 12:41 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Bruce
Location: Chicago, IL
Watch: Meteorite DD
Posts: 2,394
|
|
18 September 2009, 12:50 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: West Coast, US
Posts: 1,079
|
Oil free escapement .... by Sinn .....
__________________
Brandon |
18 September 2009, 12:57 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
You serviced your GMT ONCE in 25 years?? I'd say that's pretty good going, by any standards, and pretty darn good testimony to Rolex's quality!
|
18 September 2009, 11:52 PM | #17 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,242
|
Say a balance that vibrates 28800 times per hour rotates through (a conservative guess) 15mm cycle. That is 10368 meters per day, or 3784km per year. With a 5 year service interval that is a distance of 18920km. ALSO the watch is expected to put out a constant 99.996% accuracy.
Now think of a service charge of $500. That is 27cents per day. A car costs more than that to run for 24hours solid. |
19 September 2009, 12:11 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: 4Q
Location: Nowhere near you
Watch: 169622, 124060
Posts: 2,014
|
Quote:
The benefits of the cost of service at 5 year intervals in order to maintain an exquisite machine cannot be overstated.
__________________
One should endeavor to do what is right not what is established. |
|
19 September 2009, 01:29 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
IIRC, Bell & Ross had a diver's watch that was filled with liquid. I also believe that had to do more with increasing the depth rating (something like 10k meters or beyond) as opposed to service. There was also a rubber caseback, allowing it to expand and contract.
|
19 September 2009, 01:49 AM | #20 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: John
Location: River City Ky
Watch: none anymore
Posts: 249
|
Quote:
|
|
19 September 2009, 01:53 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
I agree. Rolex changes any worn parts in the movement when you have a service no matter how many parts are needed. Thats awsome. I feel that is one part of having a Rolex Service Center do the work on the watch that a private watchman could not compete with. They have all the new gears, jewels, pins, ect right there at their disposal. Its not even an issue to check the parts and toil with the decision to replace them or not. They just make it practically new when in doubt.
|
19 September 2009, 05:14 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Ian
Location: Spain
Watch: Ω & ♛
Posts: 1,321
|
No way any one could engineer a virtually service free mechanical device.
If we comparing to engines, service intervals are increased by using bigger oil capacities and bigger oil filters (for example Renault Trafic 1.9 dci has a 25 litre sump!! reducing service intervals) Cadillac Northstar V8´s use electronics to manage the engine in such a way that it will shut down parts of the engine that are being abused. Its said that you can run this engine on virtually zero oil, because electronics will shut down cylinders and restart others as temperatures rise and fall.. The poor Rolex just has get its head down and chug away till it either dies or someone oils it. I love honest engineering, no bells and whistles, it just does what it has to... |
19 September 2009, 05:20 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You think these folks that make watches aren't on the cutting edge of technology? Lots of things moving and in contact with each other.
Now have you been following the lube-free silica based parts in some of the Pateks and the UN watches? It will get better. Even the Omega co-axials purport to require less service, but I've also read that their service interval is an aspiration rather than a reality at this point. The car analogy is somewhat flawed too. No car is maintenance free for 100,000 miles, only elements of it. Oil, tires, battery, other fluids, wipers, etc all need changing. Even the things with a long-service interval are based on the fact that the accountants get to vote against the engineers. BMW is a perfect example, sell the car with free maintenance and then only do the minimum necessary to get through the warranty period. Like my cars, I chose to take proper care of my watches and figured that in to the ownership cost when I opted to buy them. |
19 September 2009, 05:41 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Yazan
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,782
|
i would luv to see if it happens
__________________
Patek Philippe 5167 Patek Philippe 5905P black dial Rolex Deepsea 116660 M series Rolex Oysterquartz 17000 N series Rolex OP 41MM 124300 Green Dial |
19 September 2009, 10:50 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
My dad's Rolex I mentioned in my other post stopped about 5 years ago. He was pretty upset because the salesman told him when he bought it in the seventies that it would never need anything done to it. I guess some people will believe that. I can't see how moving parts can last that long without the oils getting dirty or breaking down. |
|
19 September 2009, 11:26 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,678
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.