ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 November 2009, 10:48 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 24
|
When is a rolex considered 'too small' ??
Hi guys,
I tried on a GMT2c at the weekend and the lugs did not 'reach' the top and bottom of my wrist when looking down at the watch (hope this makes sense !!). Again, when looking down at the watch I could see about 3 links on both the 12 o'clock side and the 6 o'clock side. Does this mean that a 40mm watch is too small for the size of my wrist? I hope im being clear ! Thanks Marcus |
10 November 2009, 11:00 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,418
|
Too small or too big is a personal choice. Ive seen 4'11 105 lbs. wearing 52mm and I've seen 6'8 400lbs wearing 34mm. Wear what you like.
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting |
10 November 2009, 11:10 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US
Posts: 169
|
what size wrist do you have? do you have a picture? i have a feeling all but the DSSD is too small for me, even though i love the submariner, GMT, and daytona
|
10 November 2009, 11:14 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
|
If baggy jeans jeans, loose t-shirts, untied shoes and twisted hats are your thing... I'd think you'd want a large watch.
Seriously, it's whatever you like. There are no "rules" on what is a proper watch size for a given wrist.
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK |
10 November 2009, 11:33 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,035
|
I have quite a large wrist I wear what I want to wear most times I wear vintage some of those just 30mm.And back in the 1930s 1940s watches were quite small average 30mm and can assure there were some very large wrists about even in those days.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
10 November 2009, 11:45 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Colin Leask.
Location: Scotland, UK.
Watch: 118238 YG DD.
Posts: 723
|
I have to get an extra link in all my Rolex watches and I dont think any of them look too big or too small.
|
10 November 2009, 11:50 PM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,175
|
It's too small when you try it on and YOU decide it is and no one else.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
11 November 2009, 12:00 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: I like to...
Posts: 18,567
|
When you buy a white Explorer II and you can't really see it under your thick, white wrist hairs - THEN your watch is too small!
__________________
Instagram - @CaliberSwiss “A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson |
11 November 2009, 12:25 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
|
11 November 2009, 12:35 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
|
11 November 2009, 12:45 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
|
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK |
11 November 2009, 01:29 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
Same here Padi, this 1950 Tudor is only 30 mm but I like wearing it.
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
11 November 2009, 01:53 AM | #13 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
|
I think that there are too many folks that think that a watch should be sized like a t-shirt..
Small, medium, large, and XXX-Large.. It's nonsense...a watch does not need to be properly "proportioned" to somebodies arm...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
11 November 2009, 01:59 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 526
|
would people buy bigger jewelry like size of diamond rock because the person has bigger frame?
|
11 November 2009, 02:01 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
|
Buy what you like... the size is a matter of preference~
|
11 November 2009, 03:29 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
|
Here's a new answer for this question:
When you need to add a link or two (like I did).
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK |
11 November 2009, 03:35 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
Don't worry about what others think. Wear what you're comfortable with.
|
11 November 2009, 03:52 AM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Tristan
Location: GIRONA , SPAIN
Watch: 116520/660/710/334
Posts: 7,147
|
When you can't fit the word ROLEX on the dial
|
11 November 2009, 01:50 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Carl
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Watch: Rolex Explorer 1
Posts: 1,780
|
What's wrong with seeing some links at the top of your wrist, on either side of the case! Some of the bracelets are gorgeous, some are very utilitarian looking. I have a 36mm Omega Railmaster, with a beautiful dark brown croco strap. It looks absolutely gorgeous with the watch, and to my mind is part of the watch. You can see over a quarter inch of the strap on top of my wrist (bottom and top, I know exactly what you mean), and I think it looks great. I'm not really a fan of "bigger is better", and whether it be bracelet or strap, I believe watches should show part of a strap or bracelet. I do think it looks goofy when someone has a watch that extends to both edges of the wrist, and the strap or bracelet is almost invisible when you look at it from the top. To me, that means, "look at me! I'm so cool and insecure all at the same time, I really need this huge watch to bring attention to myself!"
On the other hand, I was at a Rolex AD after work today, looking at Milgauss (40mm) and Air King (34mm). I wanted to see also some 31mm Rolexes. I'm 60 years old, born in 1949, and I can't ever remember any male that I know of - including my Dad and various family friends - ever wearing that small a watch. Yes, the 34mm or so I remember very well (remember also, I'm not only 60 but senile as well). Even the AD said that he would not sell me that watch. It did look like a ladies' watch. Even for someone with a wrist size 6.5 in and under, 34mm is probably the smallest. I have a 7.25in wrist, and think the 34mm looks great. Just another opinion. Maybe I will see a 7 ft giant wearing a 31mm watch tomorrow! Who am I to judge! Cheers,\ Carl Cheers, Carl |
11 November 2009, 02:36 PM | #20 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
|
|
11 November 2009, 02:57 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: J
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Omega Seiko
Posts: 1,562
|
i dont believe in "too small"
a 36mm datejust will looks great on any mans wrist, the 40mm gmt-ii likewise too big on the other hand.. it baffles me when i see a small/skinny guy wearing a 48mm watch |
11 November 2009, 06:35 PM | #22 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
When the sales lady says: "JJ, that watch looks funny on you!!"
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
11 November 2009, 06:36 PM | #23 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Ya bastid.....you hinting at me?
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
11 November 2009, 08:07 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
|
I would say an Explorer 1 on Nikolai Valuev would be too small. Come to think of it a Deep Sea on his wrist would look too small. Think how much it would cost for a bracelet to fit him!
I worked with a few mates that were quite big, one mate was 7ft 1" and around 280lbs , another 7ft, another that was a spitting image of shrek! (without the colour or ears ) My mate that's 7ft 1" tried on my Omega smp, and it Just fastened using the diving extension opened, and I have 7 3/4" wrists. The smp is a decent sized watch and it looked like a kids watch on his wrist.
__________________
So Mote it be. |
11 November 2009, 08:23 PM | #25 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
I totally understand and agree that a watch is very personal etc etc but I was wondering if a watch that showed too many links would be considered as 'technically' too small. Thanks again Marcus |
|
12 November 2009, 02:12 PM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Keith
Location: FL
Watch: PP 5712
Posts: 434
|
Not that long ago 36mm was a normal to a bigger sized watch .Smaller watches will make a comeback in the next few years . I say no less than 36mm .
|
12 November 2009, 02:23 PM | #27 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,838
|
I have an AirKing at 34mm, i'm 6'1 and it looks great. I get more compliments on the 14000 AK than I do my 42.5mm Omega Planet Ocean on rubber dive strap.
The perfect Rolex in my opinion is the 36mm Explorer. Nothing better in my opinion. I love all Rolex models but I love the Explorer mark one just a bit more. Best regards, Joe |
12 November 2009, 02:35 PM | #28 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.