The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 December 2009, 04:58 AM   #1
louie
"TRF" Member
 
louie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Lewis
Location: Earth
Watch: The Beast
Posts: 1,352
Vintage Rolex

Hi fellow vintage Gurus! Falling in luv with old watches now,after gotten my submersibles. One nob question,does it makes significant difference in collectivity/resale value if old Rolex watch parts been replaced by the service parts?
__________________
" I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO
louie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2009, 09:29 AM   #2
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Hey Louie,

Some more than others. Replacement of dials and to a lesser extent can have a big impact on the valuation of a given vintage reference.

Some collectors prefer "all original", but I think we have to consider the affect on the watch in the real world. Replacement of parts like the crown and stem, seals, etc... preserve the integrity of the watch (WR) protecting the movement and dial and in my view have little to no impact on value. The same can be said of the crystal. Over time acryllic can and does develop stress cracks compromising the water resistence. Certainly a reference that was originally equipped with a superdome crystal is stunning to behold, but caution has to excersized as to water (and humidity is another issue).

More than one example has become flooded even after the crystal was replaced by an NOS superdome (cracks can occur on or off the watch).

I would say bracelets are another area where some effect on valuation can occur. A reference originally equipped with a revited bracelet for example would IMO retain more of it's value with the original (again condition).

Of course parts replaced in the movement as part of normal service are non issues in my view.

One area that often gets overlooked is case condition. The best dial in the world is handicapped if the case/lugs have been the victum of over polishing.

Best IMHO to tread cautiously around the polishing wheel.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2009, 12:28 PM   #3
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
Hey Louie,

Some more than others. Replacement of dials and to a lesser extent can have a big impact on the valuation of a given vintage reference.

Some collectors prefer "all original", but I think we have to consider the affect on the watch in the real world. Replacement of parts like the crown and stem, seals, etc... preserve the integrity of the watch (WR) protecting the movement and dial and in my view have little to no impact on value. The same can be said of the crystal. Over time acryllic can and does develop stress cracks compromising the water resistence. Certainly a reference that was originally equipped with a superdome crystal is stunning to behold, but caution has to excersized as to water (and humidity is another issue).

More than one example has become flooded even after the crystal was replaced by an NOS superdome (cracks can occur on or off the watch).

I would say bracelets are another area where some effect on valuation can occur. A reference originally equipped with a revited bracelet for example would IMO retain more of it's value with the original (again condition).

Of course parts replaced in the movement as part of normal service are non issues in my view.

One area that often gets overlooked is case condition. The best dial in the world is handicapped if the case/lugs have been the victum of over polishing.

Best IMHO to tread cautiously around the polishing wheel.

Good response Mike.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2009, 02:56 PM   #4
louie
"TRF" Member
 
louie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Lewis
Location: Earth
Watch: The Beast
Posts: 1,352
thanks Mike,lesson learnt...thank you. Mike,you were rite abt the riveted bracelet too.I have seen them been replaced by the new oyster bracelet. (some still have the older clasp on the new oyster bracelet)

*I have seen the original riveted bracelet,they feel very "loose" can understand due to its design...
__________________
" I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO
louie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.