The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 December 2009, 10:59 PM   #1
Watch Professor
"TRF" Member
 
Watch Professor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
A question about clasps.

My GMT IIC has the "Easy Link" feature. Yet I see that some newer Rolexes have the "Glide Lock". What is the difference and which system will the new SS Sub have in your opinion? Thanks
Watch Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2009, 04:29 AM   #2
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watch Professor View Post
My GMT IIC has the "Easy Link" feature. Yet I see that some newer Rolexes have the "Glide Lock". What is the difference and which system will the new SS Sub have in your opinion? Thanks
Good question.

The GLIDELOCK system is an engineering improvement over the older Fliplock bracelet which had Diver extension links..........so you will find the GLIDELOCK only on the Diver's watches, i.e. all the SUBs and the DSSD. However, the No-date Sub still has the older bracelet.

The Easy Link feature can be found on virtually all the other models, even the new DJ-II.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2009, 04:53 AM   #3
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
Just in addition to what JJ said, the Glidelock clasp itself is a really clever system allowing for minor bracelet adjustments on the go. There is a sliding link which locks into place allowing the user to either expand or contract the bracelet - it's ostensibly for fitting the watch over a dive suit, but also comes in handy on hot days, for example, or any occasion that where a minor adjustment would make the watch more comfortable or secure. A very clever and elegent system
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2009, 04:59 AM   #4
Safetrends
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by The GMT Master View Post
Just in addition to what JJ said, the Glidelock clasp itself is a really clever system allowing for minor bracelet adjustments on the go. There is a sliding link which locks into place allowing the user to either expand or contract the bracelet - it's ostensibly for fitting the watch over a dive suit, but also comes in handy on hot days, for example, or any occasion that where a minor adjustment would make the watch more comfortable or secure. A very clever and elegent system
Would this make the watch more secured than the old one?
I have read about divers loosing the watch on a dive.
Safetrends is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2009, 05:02 AM   #5
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Safetrends View Post
Would this make the watch more secured than the old one?
I have read about divers loosing the watch on a dive.
I'm sure it would because in addition to the superbly engineered GLIDELOCK, the clasp still comes fitted with the FOLDOVER SECURE CLASP for additional protection.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2009, 05:22 AM   #6
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Safetrends View Post
Would this make the watch more secured than the old one?
I have read about divers loosing the watch on a dive.
It certainly won't have issues with the blades of the clasp bending like on the old one - although it is an easy fix, if they're not right, it can stop the clasp from being particularly secure. The Glidelock has far more substantial blades, and should keep their shape better, plus it has the foldover guard just to make sure
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2009, 05:25 AM   #7
Safetrends
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by The GMT Master View Post
It certainly won't have issues with the blades of the clasp bending like on the old one - although it is an easy fix, if they're not right, it can stop the clasp from being particularly secure. The Glidelock has far more substantial blades, and should keep their shape better, plus it has the foldover guard just to make sure
So that is the linch pin of the bracelet.
Safetrends is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 December 2009, 06:58 AM   #8
Watch Professor
"TRF" Member
 
Watch Professor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
Thank you JJ and Chris.
Watch Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.