ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 December 2009, 10:59 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
A question about clasps.
My GMT IIC has the "Easy Link" feature. Yet I see that some newer Rolexes have the "Glide Lock". What is the difference and which system will the new SS Sub have in your opinion? Thanks
|
27 December 2009, 04:29 AM | #2 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
The GLIDELOCK system is an engineering improvement over the older Fliplock bracelet which had Diver extension links..........so you will find the GLIDELOCK only on the Diver's watches, i.e. all the SUBs and the DSSD. However, the No-date Sub still has the older bracelet. The Easy Link feature can be found on virtually all the other models, even the new DJ-II. JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
27 December 2009, 04:53 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
Just in addition to what JJ said, the Glidelock clasp itself is a really clever system allowing for minor bracelet adjustments on the go. There is a sliding link which locks into place allowing the user to either expand or contract the bracelet - it's ostensibly for fitting the watch over a dive suit, but also comes in handy on hot days, for example, or any occasion that where a minor adjustment would make the watch more comfortable or secure. A very clever and elegent system
|
27 December 2009, 04:59 AM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
Quote:
I have read about divers loosing the watch on a dive. |
|
27 December 2009, 05:02 AM | #5 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
27 December 2009, 05:22 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
It certainly won't have issues with the blades of the clasp bending like on the old one - although it is an easy fix, if they're not right, it can stop the clasp from being particularly secure. The Glidelock has far more substantial blades, and should keep their shape better, plus it has the foldover guard just to make sure
|
27 December 2009, 05:25 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
Quote:
|
|
27 December 2009, 06:58 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
Thank you JJ and Chris.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.