ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 March 2010, 05:52 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: America
Watch: 16610
Posts: 100
|
Fake high end replica 16610 on the bay
Fake high end replica 16610 on the bay
I know the pics arent the greatest so it's hard to gauge and assess certain flaws..but there's probably NO close ups of the stampings for a reason http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Submariner...item2c5371c726 pearl just aint right, SEL fit are off, crown sits too low, and this does not look like a D serial. this is fake, you'll have to trust me...END IT |
12 March 2010, 05:57 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Great eye Steve.... watch is 100% counterfeit.
|
12 March 2010, 05:58 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
|
SEL fit and pearl do indeed not look right but i think the crown is the right position but the crown itself is not quite right.
|
12 March 2010, 05:58 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: magneeleVE
Location: Usa
Watch: magneeleVE
Posts: 2,030
|
how do you know again that this is fake?
|
12 March 2010, 05:59 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
|
12 March 2010, 06:02 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
|
Lol, you've lost me there. I was looking to see if it was high enough up the watch when viewed from the side which it looks to be. Not quite under standing which way you're describing it to be the wrong position?
|
12 March 2010, 06:05 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
Quote:
The fakes are always too far back consistent with ETA (non-Rolex) movement. |
|
12 March 2010, 06:11 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
pic
|
12 March 2010, 06:12 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
|
I think we meant the same thing! But i think it looks ok. The top edge of the teeth of the crown should just be touching/level with the bottom the bezel teeth. And on this watch it looks like they do to me.
|
12 March 2010, 06:14 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
|
A def real one
|
12 March 2010, 06:26 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jim
Location: Virginia
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 35
|
Bezel
|
12 March 2010, 06:32 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
|
For sure, it's def not genuine.
|
12 March 2010, 06:41 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Matt
Location: Concord, NC
Watch: 16570 Exp II White
Posts: 109
|
You can also look at the two "bidders" their history and names certainly point towards a scam
|
12 March 2010, 11:03 AM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,719
|
Already GONERZ!
Good job! |
12 March 2010, 10:37 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Australia
Watch: DJ16233TT
Posts: 18,485
|
__________________
Apprentice to Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth |
13 March 2010, 10:21 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: America
Watch: 16610
Posts: 100
|
bravo, that'll send a message no matter how good they think a rep is it cant fool everyone into being scammed
|
14 March 2010, 08:49 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,858
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.