ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ibsober · 25 March 2010, 04:22 AM

I wrote the seller and ask for a picture at 6:15...he complied. Then I ask about the bracelet and bezel insert...both are aftermarket, but not mentioned. I would also ask someone with a keener eye than mine, but I do not believe the dial is gilt, but rather maxi...but the I bought specticles from a traveling dentist.

robertneville · 25 March 2010, 05:23 AM

got link?

ibsober · 25 March 2010, 05:31 AM

My fault...way to much pyote...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...=STRK:MEWAX:IT

mcjp6 · 25 March 2010, 06:10 AM

It is not a gilt dial as described.

No serial number is given and the year claimed as 1966 although the case back (which can be swapped) says 1970.

If the watch is from 1970 then the dial there may be the correct feet first maxi. The seller may not know what a gilt dial is??

With his feedback score I would NOT be buying here in any case.

ibsober · 25 March 2010, 06:16 AM

Sort of the point I was trying to make at the start of the thread. Thank you for confirming it was not a Gilt. I emailed the guy and told him he needed to revise his listing to disclose the aftermarket bracelet and bezel, and told him from where I sat it wasn't a maxi dial. I say we give him time to take action and if not Casper may come a callin...He was nice enough to send me a picture with the hands adjusted, so he at least has a watch...kinda.

TimeToGo · 25 March 2010, 08:41 AM

bayshoregold.6350 ( 2 )

25 March 2010, 04:22 AM	#1
ibsober "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Odessa, TX Posts: 237	Might steer clear of this 5513...MOOOOO I wrote the seller and ask for a picture at 6:15...he complied. Then I ask about the bracelet and bezel insert...both are aftermarket, but not mentioned. I would also ask someone with a keener eye than mine, but I do not believe the dial is gilt, but rather maxi...but the I bought specticles from a traveling dentist.

25 March 2010, 05:23 AM	#2
robertneville "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Greg Location: PA Watch: me burn Posts: 1,435	got link? __________________ Motocross is life!

25 March 2010, 05:31 AM	#3
ibsober "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Odessa, TX Posts: 237	My fault...way to much pyote... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...=STRK:MEWAX:IT

25 March 2010, 06:10 AM	#4
mcjp6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Michael Location: VK2 - AUS Watch: 5513s Posts: 7,380	It is not a gilt dial as described. No serial number is given and the year claimed as 1966 although the case back (which can be swapped) says 1970. If the watch is from 1970 then the dial there may be the correct feet first maxi. The seller may not know what a gilt dial is?? With his feedback score I would NOT be buying here in any case.

25 March 2010, 06:16 AM	#5
ibsober "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Odessa, TX Posts: 237	Sort of the point I was trying to make at the start of the thread. Thank you for confirming it was not a Gilt. I emailed the guy and told him he needed to revise his listing to disclose the aftermarket bracelet and bezel, and told him from where I sat it wasn't a maxi dial. I say we give him time to take action and if not Casper may come a callin...He was nice enough to send me a picture with the hands adjusted, so he at least has a watch...kinda.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)