ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

cdelgado1982 · 24 April 2010, 01:33 AM

damn... even on the side of the bracelet is covered.. lol

RRGHOST1 · 24 April 2010, 01:41 AM

Imagine going swimming in one of those watches and coming out of the sea and finding one of the diamonds has fallen off ! Mind you if you can afford a watch like that, losing a few diamonds wouldnt pose any problems.

vivC · 24 April 2010, 01:42 AM

Different strokes for different folks... IMHO, it doesn't look very attractive as a watch. But as a chunky bracelet/jewelry thing, I guess it's not much different than what's out there.

Guess you couldn't really wear that riding the NYC subways, huh? But then people would just think it's from Canal Street.

Rolex Junky · 24 April 2010, 01:47 AM

I think you all might be mistaken. The watch in the above picture feautures SWAROVSKI daimonds and can be bought at any serious dealer along the Turkish coast for the retail price of 10.000 turkish lira.

vivC · 24 April 2010, 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolexplorer2

Imagine going swimming in one of those watches and coming out of the sea and finding one of the diamonds has fallen off ! Mind you if you can afford a watch like that, losing a few diamonds wouldnt pose any problems.

You can always have your manservant hold it for you while you swim!

Or buy a new one if you do lose a few diamonds... oh the options available to the affluent few.

bewithabob · 24 April 2010, 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rscmaine

I never undertood that watch...why bother with a GMT and which can't be used to tell time in a second time zone? The 4th hand just points outward at shiney nothingness.

precisely.

InVision · 24 April 2010, 02:27 AM

Well I meet with the guy I made the bet with tonight. Still have no definitive answer on the most expensive watch made by ROLEX.

Mike

24 April 2010, 01:33 AM	#31
cdelgado1982 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: christian Location: new jersey Watch: ROLEX BRIETLINGS Posts: 91	damn... even on the side of the bracelet is covered.. lol __________________ christian D. I LOVE ROLEX

24 April 2010, 01:41 AM	#32
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,991	Imagine going swimming in one of those watches and coming out of the sea and finding one of the diamonds has fallen off ! Mind you if you can afford a watch like that, losing a few diamonds wouldnt pose any problems.

24 April 2010, 01:42 AM	#33
vivC Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Vivian Location: USA Posts: 18	Different strokes for different folks... IMHO, it doesn't look very attractive as a watch. But as a chunky bracelet/jewelry thing, I guess it's not much different than what's out there. Guess you couldn't really wear that riding the NYC subways, huh? But then people would just think it's from Canal Street.

24 April 2010, 01:47 AM	#34
Rolex Junky Banned Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Lorenzo Location: Netherlands Watch: 116710LN & 116201 Posts: 849	I think you all might be mistaken. The watch in the above picture feautures SWAROVSKI daimonds and can be bought at any serious dealer along the Turkish coast for the retail price of 10.000 turkish lira.

24 April 2010, 02:27 AM	#37
InVision Banned Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Mike Location: Destin, FL USA Watch: Outerspace DayDate Posts: 2,662	Well I meet with the guy I made the bet with tonight. Still have no definitive answer on the most expensive watch made by ROLEX. Mike

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)