ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JJ Irani · 28 September 2010, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rfknauss

JJ ..... no ..... just misguided!

By the way ..... check the poll results ..... almost 25% voted with me.

Ahh..........so now we know at least 25% are mad!!

vukotab · 28 September 2010, 06:11 AM

If you like LV, keep it. IMHO is much better to start saving for next purchase (and YM is great choice), than to sell something you like. You`ll regret it, and won`t be able to enjoy beauty of YM.
Just my two cents...

altoonabcm157 · 28 September 2010, 06:48 AM

keep the LV

Richard. · 28 September 2010, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nairn1980

However I do still love the LV...and wondering if I would regret getting rid of it?

You've answered your own question! Don't but the YM unless you can afford to buy both.

Kiddodoc · 28 September 2010, 10:16 AM

I have both and love both for different reasons. If you can afford them both do so. People under appreciate the YM but is wears really well and is unique to the Rolex Family and yes I speak from experience. My philosophy is that you only live once and you can't take it with you but at least my son will inherit mine!

Boopie · 28 September 2010, 12:22 PM

I have, and love, the ss/platinum YM. If you can afford both, keep the LV, as you may want a Submariner in the future.

Nairn1980 · 28 September 2010, 04:19 PM

Everyone,

Thank you SO much!

Opinions really helpful.
I am keeping LV.

When I got my SS Daytona (now sold) I couldnt live with the PCL and I was constantly paranoid about scratching it. I also found it almost too dressy.

I only can afford to have 1 Rolex, so I will be keeping the LV.

Maybe in the future I will get a YM if I see one at a good price and I am in the position to do so. However the LV goes no-where.

Thanks again everyone.

sleddog · 28 September 2010, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nairn1980

Everyone,

Thank you SO much!

Opinions really helpful.
I am keeping LV.

When I got my SS Daytona (now sold) I couldnt live with the PCL and I was constantly paranoid about scratching it. I also found it almost too dressy.

I only can afford to have 1 Rolex, so I will be keeping the LV.

Maybe in the future I will get a YM if I see one at a good price and I am in the position to do so. However the LV goes no-where.

Thanks again everyone.

Good choice Nairn.....
The LV is a great watch and with a simple bezel swap it's instantly two in one...It's a keeper for sure!

Changmaisausage · 28 September 2010, 04:37 PM

I had my LV back in 2004 for six months I swapped it for a Yachtmaster, no regrets. The YM is one of the most underated watches for me especially the plat model. In fact I wearign it today and loving it!

I will probably end up buying another LV in the future.

BUY BOTH

ttomczak · 28 September 2010, 09:47 PM

Just have both!

Check · 6 October 2010, 03:44 AM

Keep the LV. YM does nothing for me.

View Poll Results: LV Or Yachtmaster SS/PLAT
Sell/px the LV for Yachtmaster	20	17.70%
Buy the Yachtmaster and DONT SELL THE LV!!	56	49.56%
Don't buy the Yachtmaster at all	8	7.08%
Why would you want to swap an LV for a Yachtmaster? are you mad?	29	25.66%
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll

28 September 2010, 06:11 AM	#32
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	If you like LV, keep it. IMHO is much better to start saving for next purchase (and YM is great choice), than to sell something you like. You`ll regret it, and won`t be able to enjoy beauty of YM. Just my two cents... __________________ My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/

28 September 2010, 04:37 PM	#39
Changmaisausage "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: David Location: UK/Qatar Watch: SeaDweller Posts: 470	I had my LV back in 2004 for six months I swapped it for a Yachtmaster, no regrets. The YM is one of the most underated watches for me especially the plat model. In fact I wearign it today and loving it! I will probably end up buying another LV in the future. BUY BOTH __________________ Patek Phillipe / Rolex / Tudor

28 September 2010, 09:47 PM	#40
ttomczak 2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Thomas Location: North Carolina Watch: The Beach Posts: 3,449	Just have both! __________________ If you wind it, it tells pretty good time (Paul Newman)

28 September 2010, 06:48 AM	#33
altoonabcm157 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Brent Location: Northern NJ Watch: 16710 Posts: 46	keep the LV

28 September 2010, 10:16 AM	#35
Kiddodoc "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Rick Location: Texas Watch: 15 and counting! Posts: 3,537	I have both and love both for different reasons. If you can afford them both do so. People under appreciate the YM but is wears really well and is unique to the Rolex Family and yes I speak from experience. My philosophy is that you only live once and you can't take it with you but at least my son will inherit mine!

28 September 2010, 12:22 PM	#36
Boopie "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Beverly Hills, CA Watch: Yachtmaster Posts: 3,985	I have, and love, the ss/platinum YM. If you can afford both, keep the LV, as you may want a Submariner in the future.

28 September 2010, 04:19 PM	#37
Nairn1980 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: UK Watch: GMT Posts: 8,412	Everyone, Thank you SO much! Opinions really helpful. I am keeping LV. When I got my SS Daytona (now sold) I couldnt live with the PCL and I was constantly paranoid about scratching it. I also found it almost too dressy. I only can afford to have 1 Rolex, so I will be keeping the LV. Maybe in the future I will get a YM if I see one at a good price and I am in the position to do so. However the LV goes no-where. Thanks again everyone.

6 October 2010, 03:44 AM	#41
Check "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Matt Vera Location: So Cal Watch: Explorer (124270) Posts: 314	Keep the LV. YM does nothing for me.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)