ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Chris the Greek · 27 October 2010, 12:23 AM

I am impressed, I thought I'd be greatly outnumbered.

Something about the non-date looks so bold and reflective, cant quite put my finger on it.

GEO_79 · 27 October 2010, 12:48 AM

YES;you are the only person

Nahligah · 27 October 2010, 12:58 AM

Same here. Non date Sub is the watch I would get or a SD.

Teofilo · 27 October 2010, 01:34 AM

Loads of us on here prefer the Sub rather than the Sub Date. Took me a year to decide between them, but have never regretted getting mine without the date....It's just a classic look, clean and uncluttered.

jeremyam · 27 October 2010, 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moviefreak

if you like no cyclops and clean lines.. a SD will do the trick anytime....

totally agree the Sea Dweller is perfect compromise between function and cleanliness. great comment.

RolexSoFla · 27 October 2010, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris the Greek

Am I the only person that thinks the NON-DATE version of the Sub is looks so much nicer than the date version....

No, you are not. I don't particularly care for the date feature or need it. I own a calendar.

WARVET · 27 October 2010, 09:33 AM

No, I own a 16710 but in my mind the 14060 is almost the perfect watch, Everthing a watch should be with nothing extra. I wish Rolex would give it a SEL bracelet and offer an all gold model. To me if you own more than one date watch It's gotta be pain to keep all the dates current.

rfknauss · 27 October 2010, 09:45 AM

My 5513 DAY/DATE Sub.

Nica64 · 27 October 2010, 10:20 AM

No you are not alone!!

George Ab · 27 October 2010, 04:07 PM

Love the clean look. It took me years to cross over to the cyclops. Air King, Sub ND, Sea-dweller, and then finally... finally a cyclops. Life is full of compromises.

tulsaokusa · 27 October 2010, 04:38 PM

Hilarious eyeglasses pic. Too funny.

Rock · 27 October 2010, 07:56 PM

Intellectually, the idea of having the date on a watch sounds like a really good idea as I often can't remember the date. In practice, it doesn't matter as there is always a calendar or someone to tell me. I do think the cyclops spoils the look of the Sub Date and I also prefer the look with the date but no cyclops. For simple beauty and style it is hard to beat the 14060 however.

Dr. Jones · 27 October 2010, 08:42 PM

I love most of the subs. I own four, I did own the new sub, it drove me nuts (felt wrong on my wrist) I sold it one month into it. I love the classic sub and I love ny ND sub as well. Newer is not all ways better.

If I could change one thing about the 14060 it would be SEL the old style rattles like a VW auto. Drives me mad at times.

vukotab · 27 October 2010, 09:02 PM

No, you`re not!
I was (and still I am) HUGE cyclops fan, but there is SOMETHING about No Date Sub that is simply mesmerizing!

27 October 2010, 10:20 AM	#39
Nica64 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: USA Posts: 2,596	No you are not alone!! __________________ ______________________________ You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again.

27 October 2010, 04:07 PM	#40
George Ab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: George Location: Seattle Watch: One of Them Posts: 6,924	Love the clean look. It took me years to cross over to the cyclops. Air King, Sub ND, Sea-dweller, and then finally... finally a cyclops. Life is full of compromises. __________________

27 October 2010, 07:56 PM	#42
Rock 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Rocky Location: Australia Watch: Grail:Bluesy Posts: 17,846	Intellectually, the idea of having the date on a watch sounds like a really good idea as I often can't remember the date. In practice, it doesn't matter as there is always a calendar or someone to tell me. I do think the cyclops spoils the look of the Sub Date and I also prefer the look with the date but no cyclops. For simple beauty and style it is hard to beat the 14060 however. __________________ Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."

27 October 2010, 09:02 PM	#44
vukotab "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Real Name: Vukota Brajovi Location: Belgrade,Serbia Watch: ing movies! Posts: 3,812	No, you`re not! I was (and still I am) HUGE cyclops fan, but there is SOMETHING about No Date Sub that is simply mesmerizing! __________________ My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/

27 October 2010, 12:23 AM	#31
Chris the Greek Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: London Posts: 47	I am impressed, I thought I'd be greatly outnumbered. Something about the non-date looks so bold and reflective, cant quite put my finger on it.

27 October 2010, 12:48 AM	#32
GEO_79 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Georgian Location: Constanta_Romania Watch: 216570 Polar Posts: 904	YES;you are the only person

27 October 2010, 12:58 AM	#33
Nahligah Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Alex Location: Pattaya Thailand Watch: not enough... Posts: 244	Same here. Non date Sub is the watch I would get or a SD.

27 October 2010, 01:34 AM	#34
Teofilo Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Peter Location: East Anglia Watch: 14060M,16710 PEPSI Posts: 923	Loads of us on here prefer the Sub rather than the Sub Date. Took me a year to decide between them, but have never regretted getting mine without the date....It's just a classic look, clean and uncluttered.

27 October 2010, 09:33 AM	#37
WARVET "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Vincent Location: Louisiana Watch: 16710 Coke Posts: 448	No, I own a 16710 but in my mind the 14060 is almost the perfect watch, Everthing a watch should be with nothing extra. I wish Rolex would give it a SEL bracelet and offer an all gold model. To me if you own more than one date watch It's gotta be pain to keep all the dates current.

27 October 2010, 04:38 PM	#41
tulsaokusa Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: N/A Location: N/A Watch: 2010 SS/Black SubC Posts: 773	Hilarious eyeglasses pic. Too funny.

27 October 2010, 08:42 PM	#43
Dr. Jones Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Jack Location: Boise Watch: LV Sub, GMT IIC Posts: 122	I love most of the subs. I own four, I did own the new sub, it drove me nuts (felt wrong on my wrist) I sold it one month into it. I love the classic sub and I love ny ND sub as well. Newer is not all ways better. If I could change one thing about the 14060 it would be SEL the old style rattles like a VW auto. Drives me mad at times.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)