ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

melloyello · 28 February 2011, 09:12 AM

http://orangecounty.craigslist.org/jwl/2237255131.html i looked at this watch this morning.......i know its hard to tell by these photos.....it is a Y serial....it looked like it had never been worn.....it was a very very good fake(i think)....the serial numbers wern't postioned correctly.....it didn't have SEL for a 2002(i know sometimes they don't in 2002)....he didn't have papers...no handtag with serial number....it had a cloth and anchor and box with gold trim.....the band had hollow links.....it just seemed too light....it was the no date sub.....maybe it was real....but i think it was a very good fake.....the movement had a light clicking to it...not a deep sound.....plus the watch was just too clean!

SkyKing31 · 28 February 2011, 09:15 AM

Hard to tell by looking at the photos

ROGERB · 28 February 2011, 09:17 AM

Well 14060's do not come with SEL, only with standard 93150 bracelets and those pics just don't provide enough evidence one way or the other

R

GradyPhilpott · 28 February 2011, 10:04 AM

The coronet looks suspicious on the dial.

It looks to squat to me.

It could be the angle, but then again, isn't that why scammers usually post such bad pictures?

The GMT Master · 28 February 2011, 10:14 AM

The Sub ND is a very light and rattly watch, it's the one watch in the range that hasn't had any modifications made to the bracelet. But it's hard to tell from those pictures. If your gut feeling isn't right, then don't part with any cash

Randy72379 · 28 February 2011, 10:30 AM

More than likely a Folex Fubmariner.

28 February 2011, 09:12 AM	#1
melloyello "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Bruce Lee Location: california Watch: SS Sub Posts: 73	Is this a fake Sub on CL? http://orangecounty.craigslist.org/jwl/2237255131.html i looked at this watch this morning.......i know its hard to tell by these photos.....it is a Y serial....it looked like it had never been worn.....it was a very very good fake(i think)....the serial numbers wern't postioned correctly.....it didn't have SEL for a 2002(i know sometimes they don't in 2002)....he didn't have papers...no handtag with serial number....it had a cloth and anchor and box with gold trim.....the band had hollow links.....it just seemed too light....it was the no date sub.....maybe it was real....but i think it was a very good fake.....the movement had a light clicking to it...not a deep sound.....plus the watch was just too clean! __________________ cashwatchbuyer.com pulpracing.com

28 February 2011, 10:04 AM	#4
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,447	The coronet looks suspicious on the dial. It looks to squat to me. It could be the angle, but then again, isn't that why scammers usually post such bad pictures? __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

28 February 2011, 09:15 AM	#2
SkyKing31 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Manalapan Florida Watch: Tridor Masterpiece Posts: 2,819	Hard to tell by looking at the photos

28 February 2011, 09:17 AM	#3
ROGERB "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Roger Location: WHITE ROCK BC Watch: 89 16610, 57 7914, Posts: 897	Well 14060's do not come with SEL, only with standard 93150 bracelets and those pics just don't provide enough evidence one way or the other R

28 February 2011, 10:14 AM	#5
The GMT Master "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: England Posts: 8,150	The Sub ND is a very light and rattly watch, it's the one watch in the range that hasn't had any modifications made to the bracelet. But it's hard to tell from those pictures. If your gut feeling isn't right, then don't part with any cash

28 February 2011, 10:30 AM	#6
Randy72379 Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Randy Location: Pennsylvania Watch: 16014 SS Posts: 20	More than likely a Folex Fubmariner.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)