ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 February 2011, 07:52 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: the neighbourhood
Watch: 1680 Red
Posts: 2,262
|
Top Hat
in a Vintage panic i just called the RSC to confirm exactly what they were going to do to my Red Sub, despite my initial instructions i started getting edgy thinking about the silver wheel being swapped, pearl being switched for a lumed one... i mentioned the Top Hat glass & would it be left 'as is' & was told it would be replaced for a new one otherwise the watch would not be waterproof...the term 'top hat' didn't seem to be recognized either. so, unless i state otherwise would it be returned with a modern glass, such as those on a 16610 ?
__________________
SS Sub Date (F) DSSD (V) Red Sub (Mk4) TRF Hall of Fame |
24 February 2011, 08:39 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Thailand
Posts: 32
|
I believe service crystal for 1680 is beveled 127 like mine, not squared one as original.
|
24 February 2011, 09:17 PM | #3 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,986
|
Quote:
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
|
24 February 2011, 09:32 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
The 16610 uses sapphire. The 1680 takes an acryllic.
|
24 February 2011, 09:40 PM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,986
|
Exactly!!!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
24 February 2011, 09:45 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: the neighbourhood
Watch: 1680 Red
Posts: 2,262
|
Quote:
__________________
SS Sub Date (F) DSSD (V) Red Sub (Mk4) TRF Hall of Fame |
|
24 February 2011, 10:41 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,928
|
there are several slight variation in the replacement 127 glass...though they are all 127 ....varying degree of a bevel on the glass thats all...will depend which one they garb out of the drawer...wont have much bearing on the value either way ...and if they wont keep the old one in it means it wont pass pressure test and without a new one you wont get an international guarantee /service paper....and they are so stressed in there at the moment they may get arsey. unlike the domed crystal no one really get stressed about these.
no big deal to take it honest, and waterproof doesn't just mean swimming ..it also means if you wear it in the pouring rain you dont suddenly look down and find a flooded watch!! |
24 February 2011, 11:02 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
Sometimes in the quest for "orginality" we risk serious damage over time. |
|
24 February 2011, 11:30 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: the neighbourhood
Watch: 1680 Red
Posts: 2,262
|
cheers guys, when i called them this morning i referred to the glass as a 'top hat' which didn't get much acknowledgment, and i couldn't find any other term to explain my query.
__________________
SS Sub Date (F) DSSD (V) Red Sub (Mk4) TRF Hall of Fame |
24 February 2011, 11:36 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
|
This the modern service replacement that Bob Ridley put on mine about a year ago...
Bob explained to me that it is standard watchmaking practice to change an acrylic crystal every time the watch is serviced. They simply cannot be counted on if reused. The benefit you get by going to a guy like Bob is that he'd likely give you the swapped parts back, and he would install a new vintage stock 127 (generally a bit more but no chamfer/bevel). For example: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Vintage-Rolex-...-/160483266519 From most angles you don't notice the chamfer/bevel... From Bob's workbench: |
25 February 2011, 07:30 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
I love my 1680's top hat! I'd have to spring for the vintage replacement.
|
25 February 2011, 08:15 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
When i spoke top RSC West Malling (formerly Bexley) last week they said that unlike a sapphire glass, a replacement plexi is included in the service price on older models, unless I requested otherwise of course
I know exactly how you're feeling Chad, paranoia is another another name for heightened awareness these days, but we just want things to be right don't we? |
25 February 2011, 08:21 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
This is a Top Hat!
|
25 February 2011, 08:22 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
|
25 February 2011, 08:47 AM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Rick
Location: Smokin' Heaven
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 3,858
|
Very familiar with thie top hat. Have one on my snowflake. If your concerned about originality and future value just ask them to give you the one they are removing and keep it. Unless of course it's damaged. If they won't take it to a private watch maker.
|
25 February 2011, 06:22 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: the neighbourhood
Watch: 1680 Red
Posts: 2,262
|
RSC called me back late yesterday & said that they didn't think the plexi currently on my 1680 was genuine Rolex, either way i've gone with the replacement plexi.
__________________
SS Sub Date (F) DSSD (V) Red Sub (Mk4) TRF Hall of Fame |
25 February 2011, 10:47 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
|
I had mine done by an independent, but when I mentioned that I wanted a top-hat they understood and fitted an unused, NOS tophat, and assured me they've stocked up well.
I really, really like it over beveled, and its hard to trust an old plexi. Incidentally even though it was still good and passed pressure test, they only tested to 100M +25% and advised against pushing any further than that on a tophat.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 -- -- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 -- -- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 -- -- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 -- |
26 February 2011, 04:44 PM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,189
|
Love the thick and extended crystal
|
26 February 2011, 09:56 PM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Todd
Location: US
Posts: 3,528
|
I love these plastic shots.
|
27 February 2011, 01:18 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Ray
Location: Dallas, Tx
Watch: 114060
Posts: 232
|
High and mighty on another note....what's the thickness of these 1680s (case and crystal)? is it, say as thick as a modern sea dweller? |
27 February 2011, 01:23 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
|
|
27 February 2011, 01:51 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: france
Posts: 5
|
Hello,
I don't understand exactly what type of glass is original on the 1680 (I'm french...so it's hard for me to understand everything!!). To be clear, on a 1680 what is original : beveled glass http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/e...0/DSC00749.jpg OR straight glass http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...o/b79d7783.jpg |
27 February 2011, 03:15 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: france
Posts: 5
|
Hello,
I don't understand clearly (I'm french) what glass fit originally the 1680 : the beveled or staight?? Maybe it depend of the making year? |
27 February 2011, 04:02 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
|
All 1680s had straight originally. Over time, Rolex made changes to the service replacement crystals and they are now beveled. It is possible to find old straight crystals in unused condition, but they are old and might not pass pressure testing (though I hear most do).
|
27 February 2011, 05:21 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: france
Posts: 5
|
Thanks for you answer TheDude
|
27 February 2011, 05:32 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Ray
Location: Dallas, Tx
Watch: 114060
Posts: 232
|
|
3 March 2011, 02:59 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Lonnie
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex 1680-8
Posts: 80
|
Interesting. I read on VRF last year that the tophats were service replacements from the 70's and 80's. Originals were slightly beveled and the new service crystals are the even more beveled ones we commonly see. Do Rolex cataloges from the 70's show what the crystal shape is??
Lonnie |
3 March 2011, 04:18 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Belvidere,il
Posts: 268
|
I received my 1680 circa 1978 back from rcs Dallas in nov 2010. The replacement crystal had no bevel. Fwiw
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.