The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 March 2011, 11:07 AM   #31
Andad
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,749
I'll have two bob on Larry.

A Forum member once demontrated that shaking a watch quickly and violently from side to side had a serious affect on the balance wheel and lowered the amplitude. The watch would run slightly faster and pick up a few seconds. He would use this method for his watches that were running slow.
A search might find it.
This method was not recommended.
__________________
E

Andad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2011, 11:20 AM   #32
Paracentesis
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
No offence, but the explanation given makes no sense.
Paracentesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2011, 11:31 AM   #33
brownbear
"TRF" Member
 
brownbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Danny
Location: georgia
Watch: it Bub
Posts: 1,334
I do not run very fast..
brownbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2011, 12:43 PM   #34
cdnwatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
cdnwatchguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 921
Well

running negatively affected the accuracy of my right knee so it might affect a watch too.
__________________
Keith
cdnwatchguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2011, 01:14 PM   #35
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
http://www.minus4plus6.com/ouch.htm
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2011, 01:21 PM   #36
liptonnr
"TRF" Member
 
liptonnr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Nate
Location: Pottsville, PA
Watch: Sub-c LV, GMT's
Posts: 988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
The correct answer is yes...

This is why... (caution, a physics lesson follows)

Your watch uses a balance (the hairspring is wrapped around it) that typically rotates (oscillates) about 300 degrees. This is the regulator of the tick-tock, and ideally it oscillates (ticks) 28,800 times per hour. When it does, your watch is absolutely accurate to the n'th degree...

When you vigorously swing your arms (wrist), then the external force you are applying affects the balance and it does not make it to the 300 degrees before it is forced back......... and your rotation (amplitude) is then only about 240 degrees as an example...

It takes less time for the balance to rotate 240 degrees than the full 300 degrees and so as long as that external influence exists, your watch then "ticks" at 30,000 beats per hour... it speeds up..

Therefore, in theory, a watch that is worn will always beat slightly faster than one on the dresser (or a winder) because of the external forces... and vigorous external forces, such as the treadmill or jogging, will have much more affect than simply walking..

You're welcome.......
This is correct and makes perfect sense!
liptonnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2011, 01:37 PM   #37
htc8p
"TRF" Member
 
htc8p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,487
i think yes. especially if your watch is not used to that motion. if you always move around with your rolex (ex daily wear) then running will have much of an impact and the opposite also goes
htc8p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2011, 08:00 PM   #38
Paracentesis
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
LOL. The concept of a watch "getting used to" your daily activities is a lovely one. Back in the real world: lots of people all around the world run with their watches, and I'm sure Rolex and other watch manufacturers know this. If there was a significant effect on timekeeping (which there isn't, IME) then they would put a little disclaimer in their literature.
Paracentesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2011, 05:52 AM   #39
skywag
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: N47.9 W122.7
Watch: S/S "P" Daytona
Posts: 216
Rolex accuracy is an oxymoron. Rolex makes jewelry.

If you want an accurate watch, buy something like this.
skywag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 March 2011, 07:35 AM   #40
Paracentesis
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
Quite, but completely beside the point. What we are discussing is whether vigorous exercise will cause a Rolex to gain 30 seconds in 24 hours. Extremely unlikely, IMO.
Paracentesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

Takuya Watches

WatchesOff5th


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.