Basil 2011 reflections from an old Omega fan

[jmsrolls]

In a sense, I am disappointed with the Omega introductions and Rolex as well, but on the other hand, I am delighted.

First off, My Liquidmetal LE is looking better all the time. I have never had a problem with any of the seven 2500 movements I have owned, including A, B, & C versions, so the larger, thicker 8500 movement is not an attraction for me. And Ti is a deal killer for me. With all the changes to the Planet Ocean, my LM LE will be a one-of-a-kind along with only 1947 others. Thank you Omega for making it a true collectible.

Certainly, the new SMP models cannot hold a candle to the classic sword hand models. And who needs any Speedy other than the Professional with the classic Lemania manual wind movement?

So bottom line: I am quite happy with my LM, my 2255.80, and my Speedy Pros.

Omega's "Rolex" marketing decisions have made me ask "If Omega wants to be like Rolex, why not buy Rolex?" That is why I have recently added two classic discontinued Rolex models to my collection, a GMT Master II and a Sea-Dweller. These two represent the "end-of-an-era" for Rolex and should easily maintain, or increase in, value. Plus, they are a joy to wear.

Fr. John†

[LWRN]

As a non LM PO owner, I am glad I got it when it did and I do ponder the future value of the 2500c PO's. As an owner of a LE, LM w/2500c PO, you definitely have a rare bird. As far as Basel offerings, I am excited about the new PO w/8500, ceramic bezel, and screw links, although I can not tell from the pictures if it has micro-adjustments in the clasp or whether it will be offered in 42mm??? But crossing into the price demographic of the new PO, I think I would rather be on the receiving end of the venerable 3135, 3185 and 3186's, that have more proven time in grade than the fairly new 8500. I'm also excited about the 3187 EXP II. It seems that there are either people who like the size and upgrades or those that don't. I happen to be in the former group, and IMHO its very balanced how they slightly increased the size, without the use of the supercase, I do however would have preferred a trip lock crown.

[gaopa]

Well stated, Fr. John! Cheers, Bill P.

[RW16610]

Very well said, John After owning the Omega Caliber 2500A and 2500C my feelings are the same as yours. Omega (Swatch Group) owns ETA who made the base movement so see no issues there with it. Prices went WAY up and to me personally it is not worth it. They look great the new watches but the classics hold a special place with me, indeed. Your 1000% correct about this price point thing in terms of Omega's Rolex style marketing. Based on my preferences and several other reasons, when paying that much for a watch doing things so similar to Rolex it seems a compromise. An excellent choice you made getting the Sea-Dweller and GMT Master II. Keep those along with your classic Omega watches and enjoy in the best of health for the rest of your life!