ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 June 2007, 09:00 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 2,480
|
Watch terminology and values
What constitutes a vintage or classic Rolex? I have a 1991 SS Sub that is in excellent condition. I'm not sure it would be considered a classic, but who am I to say. Where would I be able to determine a fair price (assuming I wanted to trade or sell it). I don't want to be taken by a dealer, even an AD. Thanks.
|
19 June 2007, 09:20 AM | #2 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 355
|
Quote:
Please see my answer in "Quick question about Rolex Datejust" posting. I think it was yesterday or the day before. |
|
19 June 2007, 09:23 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 31
|
The answer to this question is not easy and with many opinions. Most feel that vintage starts when something turns 25...tell that to a 25 year old! As far as what is a classic Rolex, that is entirely up to each individual. Some may feel that a diamond encrusted Day Date is a classic, others, a Military issued Submariner. They are all classics, some more than others, depends on who it is.
|
19 June 2007, 09:37 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Yeah, this isn't easy to answer.
Vintage means different things to different people. To a collector it might be the 25 year old rule, matt tritium dial, a movement no longer made, or an acryllic crystal. Some feel the transitionals should be considered vintage, other purists feel the sapphire crystal of some transitionals eliminate them. I think a vintage can be considered a classic, but perhaps not the other way around. As an example, a COMEX Sub might not be a vintage piece, but it heritage make it the classic tool watch IMO. In determining value, all other things being equal, condition is king. |
19 June 2007, 09:42 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
I would say the term "classic" could apply to a brand new 14060M, 116610 etc.
Not sure at what age the "vintage" label kicks in. I think it's fairly arbitrary. To me 1940 > would be vintage.
__________________
..33 |
19 June 2007, 09:56 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 2,480
|
Thanks, all. I thought the Ebay route may be a good way to value it. As the old saying goes "it's only worth what someone else is willing to pay for it".
|
19 June 2007, 10:28 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 355
|
Quote:
Exactly..... Dealers will be the very last place that I would go, for they have rent to pay, overhead, staff, profit margin and other expenses. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.