|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 August 2011, 12:16 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 450
|
DSSD and SUB-c
Does any Rolex connoisseur consider the DSSD as the "true" update for the 16610?
Or is the SUB-c the perfect update for the older 16610? I wore a 16610 for almost 8 years, loved it and regretted selling it  The DSSD reminds me of my 16610, only bigger and much improved IMO  A pic of my 16610 beside the only Breitling I still own 
__________________
ROLEX1675:126660:226570BL:116613LN:114060 Pam00279 : Pam00270 : OMEGA3861 : Navitimer A23322 : |
|
|
|
26 August 2011, 12:47 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
|
I would not consider the DSSD an update to even the 16600 let alone the 16610... The DSSD IMHO is just a huge Rolex. I much prefer the 40mm but thats just me.
The update to the 16610 to answer your question would definitely be the 116610  
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki |
|
|
|
|
26 August 2011, 01:51 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: N/A
Location: N/A
Watch: 2010 SS/Black SubC
Posts: 773
|
SubC is the update. DSSD is an entirely different watch - but commands a seperate respect for its (over)engineering and brilliant design.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
