ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 October 2011, 10:04 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft lauderdale FL
Posts: 7
|
New watch but don't know what it's worth
6581 montres
I just got my first Rolex watch...I'm not sure what it is worth. Does anyone know what a 6581 montres stainless steel band and gold colored bezel. It had on the inside of the watch cover a 6585 and then it was crossed out and 6581 was typed next to it. said montres rolex sa geneva steel, There is also scratches on glass, and hands are dark and it looks like they have the same finish of a dirty silver. should I have these two things replaced or am i making a mistake by touching anything from the original. Need some good advice |
2 October 2011, 10:05 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 557
|
Pics would greatly help! :)
|
2 October 2011, 10:46 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft lauderdale FL
Posts: 7
|
pix
Here is a pix, thx
|
2 October 2011, 10:56 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Matt
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Tramp
Posts: 2,369
|
need bigger pics
|
2 October 2011, 10:58 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
If authentic, it may be around $600
|
2 October 2011, 11:18 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft lauderdale FL
Posts: 7
|
Wow. I thought it would be worth a little more. Any idea What year it is.
|
2 October 2011, 11:21 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
Can be mid 1950's
|
2 October 2011, 11:23 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
The serial number is between the lugs, if you remove the bracelet you'd be able to see it
|
2 October 2011, 11:29 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft lauderdale FL
Posts: 7
|
I will look for that tomorrow. Should I replace hands and glass on it or leave it original. Has scratches on glass and hands tarnished
|
2 October 2011, 11:56 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 592
|
Just because it's old and Rolex doesn't mean it's worth a lot of money. It also has to be a model that collectors desire.
|
2 October 2011, 12:08 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Roscoe
Location: florida
Watch: 16618
Posts: 646
|
I think you could get 900.
|
2 October 2011, 12:26 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft lauderdale FL
Posts: 7
|
Great info guys. I will get number off it. I can't find any comparable watches like this one for sale online.
|
2 October 2011, 01:21 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Nick H.
Location: Amherst, NY
Watch: me flip
Posts: 1,901
|
$600 is to a wholesale buyer. $900 or $950 could be attained through ebay
|
10 October 2011, 11:28 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ft lauderdale FL
Posts: 7
|
The serial number is 41283. Seems to be a 1937 watch. Worth?
|
10 October 2011, 11:44 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NC
Watch: several
Posts: 98
|
seems like 41xxx puts it at late '31. as for value still likely in the range that's already been given 600ish or mayhaps more of fleabay.
|
10 October 2011, 01:09 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
|
That watch does not look like it's from the 30s. I say that as an observation, not a compliment.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090 Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M |
10 October 2011, 03:19 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,000
|
I think there may be ....
.... another digit lurking at the end of that serial number.
A 400,000 (ish) serial number would date the watch to the late 1950's. A 6585 or 6581 reference number would also ring true for the late 1950's. A nice era for Rolex watches IMO. Perhaps a competent watchmaker could (gently) clean up the case and crystal. That may reveal a nicely patina'd watch that you could put back into use without any major expense |
10 October 2011, 09:39 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NC
Watch: several
Posts: 98
|
Yeah. good call Paul. "..another digit lurking" would put it in the '50s which certainly matches the look of the watch better.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.