The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 October 2011, 10:12 PM   #1
Mike1066
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16600
Posts: 728
5512 vs. 5513 - What's the Difference?

Guys:

Alright, I'm amashamed by this post. I've been a Rolex dive watch fan for waaaay too long not to know the answer to this question. But, in my defense, I've only researched the 16600, 1665 and 1680 Red, since they are my favorites, so cut me some slack here.

But the question is: What is the difference between the 5512 and 5513? Just the movement? I know some of the dial variations (Bart Simpson, gilt, meters first, etc.) but what is the main difference? Thanks, and again, sorry for the dumb question.

V/R

Mike
__________________
V/R
Mike
Mike1066 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2011, 10:17 PM   #2
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,240
The 5512 was COSC tested.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2011, 10:20 PM   #3
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
As Padi said it's been COSC tested, therefore the dial is a 4 liner instead of a 2 liner.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2011, 10:39 PM   #4
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
The main difference is the fact that the 5512 has the chronometer rated movement and the 5513 does not. 5512's produced with 2 lines of print on the dial do not have the chronometer rating on the dial. As the 5513 started production, they needed to have a way to tell the difference between the two references. So the 5512 started to have 4 lines of print, the last two reading "superlative chronometer officially certified". The 5513 just had 2 lines of print. Both were made with gilt gloss dials and pointed crown guards early on.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2011, 10:49 PM   #5
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
Padi and Submarino you guys are fast. When I saw that no one had responded I started with my response. By the time I posted, both of you had responded to the OP's question. People helping people. That's what makes TRF so great. HAGWE.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2011, 11:34 PM   #6
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
You're the man!!!
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2011, 01:39 AM   #7
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,682
Early 5513s & 5512s can both be found with cal. 1530 movements. However, with the introduction of a free sprung balance with micro stella adjusters on the balance wheel & a Breguet overcoiled hairspring on the cal. 1560 ca. 1959-60 (and improved with the cal. 1570, ca. 1965) and the relative ease of achieving SCOC specs due to these improvements, these movements became Rolex's choice for their Chronometer-grade watches. The cal. 1520 was developed as a cheaper alternative for non-Chronometer watches only--Air-King, 5513 Sub, etc.--ca. 1965, as it uses a flat hairspring and a normal 'stick' regulator.
As an aside, there is a school of that holds that the very earliest 5512s (those manufactured prior to the ca. 1961-2 intro of the 5513) were not all submitted for chronometer testing, and this is why a majority of the earliest 5512 dials bear no OCC or SCOC markings and also why one can find cal. 1530 movements in both pre-cal. 1560 5512s and the early 5513s. In fact, throughout the years of its use, the cal. 1530 is only very infrequently found in SCOC watches and much more often in Precision or Super-Precision models. But while this is an interesting theory it remains only that for now
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2011, 02:37 AM   #8
Mike1066
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: 16600
Posts: 728
THanks guys. One last question: I know that on some of the subs, there is a circle around the minute markers. I think this is called a "chapter ring"? I could be wrong on that. Is this circle only on 5512s? THANKS!
__________________
V/R
Mike
Mike1066 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2011, 02:53 AM   #9
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1066 View Post
THanks guys. One last question: I know that on some of the subs, there is a circle around the minute markers. I think this is called a "chapter ring"? I could be wrong on that. Is this circle only on 5512s? THANKS!
No, other references had it. I want to say till about 63/4ish.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2011, 05:07 AM   #10
T5AUS
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA
Watch: ing the time go by
Posts: 1,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1066 View Post
Guys:

I know some of the dial variations (Bart Simpson, gilt, meters first, etc.) but what is the main difference? Thanks, and again, sorry for the dumb question.

V/R

Mike
Whatever is a Bart Simpson dial, do we have to call it that... (and I am a big fan of the Simpsons)

Great info guys
T5AUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2011, 09:12 AM   #11
Jagatai
"TRF" Member
 
Jagatai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Philip
Location: NY
Posts: 851
Mike what a thorough explanation! You should seriously consider writing a book.
Jagatai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2011, 09:36 AM   #12
mcjp6
"TRF" Member
 
mcjp6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: VK2 - AUS
Watch: 5513s
Posts: 7,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by T5AUS View Post
Whatever is a Bart Simpson dial,
Hi Phil, Some variations of the Rolex coronet are shaped with a relatively flat top. Some people say this then looks similar to Bart's flat top hair style. Hence it is a Bart Simpson dial...

for example (not my pictures).........
Attached Images
   
mcjp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2011, 01:39 PM   #13
T5AUS
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USA
Watch: ing the time go by
Posts: 1,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcjp6 View Post
Hi Phil, Some variations of the Rolex coronet are shaped with a relatively flat top. Some people say this then looks similar to Bart's flat top hair style. Hence it is a Bart Simpson dial...

for example (not my pictures).........
now that's imagination
Thanks Michael
T5AUS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.