ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 November 2011, 02:57 AM | #91 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,020
|
This post is a little "passive aggressive," maybe try re-structuring the thought
__________________
*Positive Waves Baby* Lug Hole Loyalist / Chamfer Line Inspector INFORTHE WIN SUB-MAH-REEEN-ER ~ !
|
25 November 2011, 03:59 AM | #92 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Not its not an investment, you don't get any return on capital. Sure you can buy a model nobody cares about and hope it will appreciate in value. But that is not an investment, its purely speculation.
|
25 November 2011, 04:24 AM | #93 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,600
|
IMHO... Get what you like, wear it and if you get a sweet deal on the price maybe you will make a few bucks if you ever decide to sell it or trade up.
__________________
✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron. |
25 November 2011, 04:42 AM | #94 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
|
Southern California
On a unrelated note, three of the four last posts are from San Diego, the other Sweden- what are the chances..
Please disregard my first post..., and Happy Thanksgiving everyone...,
__________________
-NAWCC Member |
25 November 2011, 05:13 AM | #95 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
|
25 November 2011, 05:28 AM | #96 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: BermudaAntarctica
Posts: 892
|
omega liquid metal, i think that one is a limited run watch which could retain value better than a rolex.
|
26 November 2011, 05:37 AM | #97 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 320
|
Quote:
Go black it's classic and you will never get bored of the colour. |
|
26 November 2011, 06:50 AM | #98 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Luck
Location: Toronto
Watch: yourself
Posts: 477
|
Anyone have an opinion on whether a SubC LV may hold better resale value than an LN? Given the slight price premium.
|
26 November 2011, 06:52 AM | #99 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 504
|
The LV will probably hold value a bit better than the LN, as it is bit more unique due to green color.
Notice the "grey" prices are much closer to MSRP than the price on the LN |
26 November 2011, 11:50 AM | #100 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,447
|
Using the term investment loosely, as it often is, I think a Rolex is a good investment in that you're putting money into something that will hold its value, last a lifetime, and will tell those who know that you recognize value when you see it, as well as demonstrating your exquisite taste.
A friend of mine used to call it investing in oneself. At the time, I wasn't sure what he meant, but now, some forty years later, I do understand and I agree with him completely. In economic terms, I'm not so sure.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
26 November 2011, 02:12 PM | #101 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: charles
Location: new york
Watch: explorer II
Posts: 557
|
Quote:
|
|
30 November 2011, 05:31 AM | #102 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: London
Watch: Moon Watch/Sub ND
Posts: 261
|
|
3 December 2011, 01:20 AM | #103 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 862
|
Consider if you are looking at a Rolex as an investment piece........You buy a Rolex SubC for $9000. Take into account inflation of say 3% a year. If you wanted to break even on your "investment" after 5 years, you'd have to either:
A. Buy the watch today for: $7763 B. Sell the watch for $10433 I would not view a new modern Rolex as an investment piece. Purchasing a used modern Rolex, maybe. |
3 December 2011, 05:33 AM | #104 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: End of the World
Watch: PP & Rolex
Posts: 1,970
|
I just bought a Sub-C as I love them and have no intention of ever selling it, however its good to know that when (or if lol) I'm a pensioner and if times are hard or something bad happens then I will have something to cash in for a fair price!!
|
3 December 2011, 07:47 AM | #105 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Howell, NJ
Posts: 521
|
the way some people turn and flip watches they could very well be investments-
purchased my 168000 in 2006 for 2500... you cant find subs for 2500 these days. back then rhodium roman date justs could be had all day for 2100-2400. good luck with that- I love my watches and am not a flipper. but its good to know if i ever do decide to sell. chances are ill sell for more then i purchased. |
18 December 2011, 10:57 PM | #106 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 7
|
Made my choice!
Thanks for the info terrywoods, I am picking up my SM on Monday and have gone for the classic black.
|
19 December 2011, 03:12 PM | #107 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Rolex & Omega
Posts: 697
|
Subs go up in value everyday you wear it, sentimental value that is. In about 20 years i will give my Sub to my son who i hope will love and wear the watch with fondness and with the knowledge that his old man wore the watch everyday. I will pass on a watch that has my history on every scratch, and then he can create his own history on it...
That is the most value i can ever hope for from my beloved timepiece. |
19 December 2011, 10:44 PM | #108 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: anywhere but here
Posts: 690
|
Whether your rolex is an investment or not, you can't do any worse than that guy who sold his 10% stake of apple inc for $800 in 1976 with a current market value of $35B.
|
19 December 2011, 10:57 PM | #109 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: J
Location: USA Midwest
Watch: Midsize Datejust
Posts: 2,611
|
|
19 December 2011, 11:05 PM | #110 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
|
|
20 December 2011, 01:04 PM | #111 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Tom
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Watch: 14060M & SubC
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
|
|
20 December 2011, 02:16 PM | #112 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Rod.
Location: Canada
Watch: 5513
Posts: 118
|
I bought my non-date Submariner in 1972 at a duty free shop for US$175. Replacement cost today as quoted by Rolex Canada is C$6,320+taxes. I've no idea, though, what the street value is for a nearly 40-year old SS Sub. With the overhaul service it's getting now by Rolex plus prior servicings and a new bracelet in the '80s, my total 'investment' will be around $2,000.
But I'd only ever realize a return on my 'investment' if I sell it, which I've no intention of ever doing. I've gotten pretty attached to it. Rod. |
20 December 2011, 06:08 PM | #113 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Indra
Location: Jakarta
Watch: ROLEXes, OMEGAs
Posts: 154
|
dont buy rolex for investment. Buy rolex if you love it (and I love all my rolexes)
|
22 December 2011, 03:37 PM | #114 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: brisbane
Watch: 1966 GMT
Posts: 92
|
I bought my 1675 as a tool watch for astro-navigation, that looked terrific, especially amongst the competition, in 1966, full UK sticker 84 pounds 15 shillings. Since then I have had it Rolex serviced about half a dozen times, used up 2 Jubilees, and as the last service cost me $2K [with new bracelet] a resale at about say $5K would probably see me cut even over the years.
Do I care, nope. Near 50 years with a fabulous free watch which will be passed on to my nephew in as new condition. Would have been worth double if I had kept it original, small 24 hour hand, faded bezel, dial etc. So what! I wanted a tool, which subsequently became an ornament and I have enjoyed it in the meantime. If I had spent the money I gave for my first computer, a little grape iMac, on Apple shares instead I would be much wealthier, but what would I have missed out on eh? OK, a Rolex is no longer really a tool watch, others may disagree, as all functions can be had at less cost, and greater accuracy elsewhere. So what! As many have said here, buy, and enjoy, and if the price is a little too steep, consider lightly used, and still enjoy less initial depreciation, but having from new and keeping makes for more memories! Just my tuppence worth of ramblings, please excuse. |
22 December 2011, 10:21 PM | #115 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 71
|
Well I used the idea of diversifying some of the money stuck in the bank making paltry interest into my first Rolex Sub. I managed to convince myself (and wife more importantly) that in these troubled times it would be wise to buy something of real worth. That's my story and I'm sticking to it! So yes, of course it is a wise investment.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.