ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: TT blue sub or SS GMT-c | |||
TT blue sub | 23 | 37.10% | |
SS Gmt Ceramic | 39 | 62.90% | |
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
7 September 2007, 08:27 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Watch: 116718 green
Posts: 1,944
|
TT blue sub vs SS GMT II Ceramic
So, If you were going to live with just one of the above watches which one would you choose? Imagine that they both cost the same.
|
7 September 2007, 08:31 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
I for my part would take the SS GMT II for the following reasons:
1) Being an SS, it is less proned to getting scratched up by daily wear simply because SS is harder than gold. Also, the ceramic bezel is virtually scratchproof. 2) The GMT II would go with EVERY clothes, yet the TT Blue Sub would not. 3) Having SOLID centre links and the new clasp with the hidden "Easy Extension" link, the bracelet of the new GMT II is much better made than that of the TT Blue Sub.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
7 September 2007, 08:34 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,909
|
hmmmmm....I would have to say tt sub. Of my watches it sees the most wrist time.
|
7 September 2007, 11:37 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
SS GMT II.
Additional dual time function. Better lum for night/low visibility viewing of time. |
7 September 2007, 11:42 PM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,944
|
GMT without question. The Blue is too bling for me. The GMT is infinitely more useful.
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. Tosser Cabinet Member Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
7 September 2007, 11:55 PM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: LA
Posts: 393
|
Tough choice but I voted for the GMT - new case, bracelet/clasp, maxi dial. The TT is great, but just a bit too bling with the gold
|
8 September 2007, 12:11 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: All with a crown.
Posts: 504
|
TT Sub, a bit more classic and covers all boundries and tastes.
PAtrick
__________________
"I wouldn't be part of any club that would have me as a member." Instagram: El_Diablo_Rosso |
8 September 2007, 12:39 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
|
TT blue sub! first then what ever happens to strike my fancy.
__________________
|
8 September 2007, 01:35 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,060
|
I ended up going with the GMT II C TT
I owned a 2004 TT Blue faced Submariner, then a 2006 TT Yachtmaster, and now the 2007 TT GMT II C.
I dumped the submariner because the lume was too weak, and I check my watch in the dark several times a night. Here's my take: Some major differences in my mind that make the GMT II C a better watch unless you are actually going to use it as a dive watch below 100 metres: LUME - best lume on any Rolex I've owned, including oddly my former Yachtmaster which also had the Maxi-Dial. Rolex has changed something here because the charged watch remains visible all night, including the second hand. BRACELET - much heavier clasp, better designed, with mini-extension (not enough for a wet suit-but enough to have a salty margarita on a summer's day. BEZEL - ceramic bezel is allegedly scratch proof. Some dummy on the plane yesterday banged the metal foot of his computer bag against the bezel, and whether it's luck or the ceramic, there is no mark anywhere. LATEST AND GREATEST - I don't know whether the 3186 movement with the Parachrome Bleu hairspring means anything or not, but Rolex seems to think the watch will be even more anti-magnetic, and impervious to changes in temperature. Who knows? PRESENCE - tie. Both wear with great presence on the wrist, and if you like the blue it is beautiful. The black is more classic and usable all of the time. |
8 September 2007, 02:30 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: George
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: GMT II 16710 Coke
Posts: 1,046
|
No doubt for me, SS GMT II ceramic is my choice ! I don't like that blue TT.... (sorry JJ )
__________________
|
8 September 2007, 02:31 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: houston
Watch: TT blue sub
Posts: 252
|
Blue Sub
|
8 September 2007, 02:40 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
How about a SS GMT II with a aftermarket Blue Dial?
LOL LOL LOL |
8 September 2007, 02:40 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
Blue Sub for sure, though if you want the new improvements(bigger case, ceremic bezel) wait till next year after Basel.
|
8 September 2007, 02:41 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
|
The King is Blue
|
8 September 2007, 02:45 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
SS GMT II was my vote!
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
8 September 2007, 02:51 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
I've owned and flipped both of them but would choose the SS ceramic.
__________________
..33 |
8 September 2007, 03:36 AM | #17 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
I'm a man of few words....so I think I'll paint a picture for this one!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
8 September 2007, 04:10 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: TT RG Jubi TOG
Posts: 163
|
I vote for the GMT but w/ WG jubilee instead of SS.
However, it's an unfair match up, TT vs SS. |
8 September 2007, 04:44 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: Texas
Watch: Oyster DT & GMT II
Posts: 75
|
SS Ceramic GMT.
New features, more useful....besides its newest sexy watch to have. |
8 September 2007, 08:03 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
|
8 September 2007, 08:54 AM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Man. Bch., CA USA
Watch: SS-P YM
Posts: 679
|
Mike,
You're a man of few words! |
8 September 2007, 09:39 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Georgia
Watch: Stainless Sub Date
Posts: 3,023
|
Oh, man. Can't decide. Love them both! My SS Sub fulfills the steel/black color requirement very well, but the GMT II is radically cool. The bezel does it, JMHO. On the other hand, the gold of the Sub sets that blue off so well, especially in the sunlight. Wow.
P.S.- Those excellent photos really capture the essence of each, well done!
__________________
SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB
ESTABLISHED 1953 TRF Member # 5464 |
8 September 2007, 02:43 PM | #23 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,488
|
I live with both.
__________________
E |
8 September 2007, 07:49 PM | #24 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
SS gmt is dominant
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.