ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SaddleSC · 5 February 2012, 12:51 PM

Tonight I decided to pull out a few of my watches and throw them on the scale. The results were a little surprising. The titanium PAM 177 was obviously the lightest and my classic TT Sub 16613 was next lightest...with the hollow center links and smaller case, that was no surprise.

However, I was most interested to find out that my new DJII and my Sub LVC were almost identical in weight (1 gram difference). I find the Sub C to wear heavier and I think it can be attributed to the higher center of gravity on the wrist. Here are my results...

globalmedia33 · 5 February 2012, 12:58 PM

Cool.

globalmedia33 · 5 February 2012, 01:02 PM

I'm wondering if the Sub.C LV and the GMTIIc weight the same.

MortgageGuy · 5 February 2012, 01:28 PM

Very cool, love the weight of the new ceramics, a much better presence IMHO

Lion · 5 February 2012, 02:17 PM

So Charles...are you bored
But sounds like fun.....

SaddleSC · 5 February 2012, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lion

So Charles...are you bored
But sounds like fun.....

How could you tell? We got 22" of snow last night so I needed a good indoor activity to keep me busy!

5 February 2012, 12:51 PM	#1
SaddleSC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Charles B Location: GMT -7 Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 6,131	Weighing My Collection...Literally Tonight I decided to pull out a few of my watches and throw them on the scale. The results were a little surprising. The titanium PAM 177 was obviously the lightest and my classic TT Sub 16613 was next lightest...with the hollow center links and smaller case, that was no surprise. However, I was most interested to find out that my new DJII and my Sub LVC were almost identical in weight (1 gram difference). I find the Sub C to wear heavier and I think it can be attributed to the higher center of gravity on the wrist. Here are my results... __________________ Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB

5 February 2012, 12:58 PM	#2
globalmedia33 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Thien Location: Frisco,TX/Saigon Watch: All Rolex Posts: 2,754	Cool. __________________ Sub. 5513 116710LN 116610LV “I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO

5 February 2012, 01:02 PM	#3
globalmedia33 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Thien Location: Frisco,TX/Saigon Watch: All Rolex Posts: 2,754	I'm wondering if the Sub.C LV and the GMTIIc weight the same. __________________ Sub. 5513 116710LN 116610LV “I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO

5 February 2012, 01:28 PM	#4
MortgageGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Adam Location: Orlando, Florida Watch: Me Posts: 9,935	Very cool, love the weight of the new ceramics, a much better presence IMHO __________________ The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki

5 February 2012, 02:17 PM	#5
Lion "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Leo Location: Midwest Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI Posts: 21,461	So Charles...are you bored But sounds like fun..... __________________ SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)