ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

LightOnAHill · 19 February 2012, 01:43 PM

Emerald is a very soft stone, and they way I beat up my DD, I'm sure I'd split or crack one of the stones.

I'd do that if it were green sapphires, though. :)

timeisfathaoftruth · 19 February 2012, 01:55 PM

Not for me...Not even for a Celtics game

threemonkeys · 19 February 2012, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FeelingTheBlues

What about you explain it to me when I show you that cute dress I bought to match my diamonds...

Will do, Carl. I believe you can't have one without the other. But I don't personally know anyone that had diamonds on their watch. Or do I???

RBR76 · 19 February 2012, 01:59 PM

Imagine going diving wearing this watch

After that a couple of stones on the watch go missing

TakesALickin · 19 February 2012, 02:08 PM

Seems at odds with the heritage of the Submariner model line. When did they lose sight of the fact that what makes the Sub cool is that it's a pragmatic tool watch, not blingy jewelry?

Actsulb · 19 February 2012, 02:50 PM

Way Too much bling for my taste.

outtatime · 19 February 2012, 03:22 PM

If it was just the bezel, I'd hit that. Don't care for the diamonds in the bracelet.

Baronrojo · 19 February 2012, 03:31 PM

The jewels are present but are subtle...doesn't really detract as much from the overall look. Not for me...but I can appreciate it.

captiva · 19 February 2012, 05:41 PM

Those are after market modification I guess , which RSC don't recognize.

TORRE · 19 February 2012, 05:51 PM

You could silence a whole pub if you walked in wearing that. It has lottery winner written all over it.

MonBK · 19 February 2012, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by captiva

Those are after market modification I guess , which RSC don't recognize.

Well, I guess it's time for you to take another guess.

19 February 2012, 01:55 PM	#32
timeisfathaoftruth "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Ed Location: New England Watch: Sub,Daytona,GMT,YM Posts: 997	Not for me...Not even for a Celtics game __________________ Time and tide wait for no man...

19 February 2012, 02:50 PM	#36
Actsulb 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Ali Location: California Watch: GMT II (Coke) Posts: 1,747	Way Too much bling for my taste. __________________ A Crown for Every Achievement

19 February 2012, 01:43 PM	#31
LightOnAHill "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Bryan Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: YG DD lchdp Posts: 2,963	Emerald is a very soft stone, and they way I beat up my DD, I'm sure I'd split or crack one of the stones. I'd do that if it were green sapphires, though. :)

19 February 2012, 01:59 PM	#34
RBR76 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Watch City Watch: Submariner 16610 Posts: 170	Imagine going diving wearing this watch After that a couple of stones on the watch go missing

19 February 2012, 02:08 PM	#35
TakesALickin "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Jeff Location: Indianapolis Watch: Seiko SBDX001 Posts: 256	Seems at odds with the heritage of the Submariner model line. When did they lose sight of the fact that what makes the Sub cool is that it's a pragmatic tool watch, not blingy jewelry?

19 February 2012, 03:22 PM	#37
outtatime "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Jon Location: Toledo, OH Watch: Deepsea Posts: 1,136	If it was just the bezel, I'd hit that. Don't care for the diamonds in the bracelet.

19 February 2012, 03:31 PM	#38
Baronrojo "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: CA Watch: Rolex Posts: 267	The jewels are present but are subtle...doesn't really detract as much from the overall look. Not for me...but I can appreciate it.

19 February 2012, 05:41 PM	#39
captiva Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: US Posts: 138	Those are after market modification I guess , which RSC don't recognize.

19 February 2012, 05:51 PM	#40
TORRE "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Stephen Location: STOCKPORT Watch: White Explorer II Posts: 50	You could silence a whole pub if you walked in wearing that. It has lottery winner written all over it.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)