ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

subloverR · 4 March 2012, 04:07 AM

Hello everyone!

Does anyone have PAM 40 mm and Rolex GMT (or submariner)? How do you compare between them? For some reason, I feel that PAM "looks" bigger. I would appreciate if you post pictures of both of them together.

Thanks

B. Doggy · 4 March 2012, 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by subloverR

Hello everyone!

Does anyone have PAM 40 mm and Rolex GMT (or submariner)? How do you compare between them? For some reason, I feel that PAM "looks" bigger. I would appreciate if you post pictures of both of them together.

Thanks

The PAM should look bigger.

p_mcgee · 4 March 2012, 05:55 AM

I've got both the older GMT (16710) and a PAM 48. PAM feels bigger and more chunky, though the newer GMT2c feels heavier than the PAM.

mdoc52 · 4 March 2012, 07:37 AM

I've got a PAM 244 which is their 40mm GMT and also have a DJII which is 41mm. The PAM is much chunkier on the wrist. Very thick. I've got 7.2 inch wrists and keep my watches around 40mm give or take. Love them both.

---
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=42.618250,-83.125766

jimisaint · 4 March 2012, 07:47 AM

Here's a quick picture. PAM 50/GMT

Incorrigible · 4 March 2012, 12:11 PM

My PAM 321 feels like a monster compared to the GMTiic. IMO.

jms_w · 4 March 2012, 02:06 PM

I have a PAM00244 (40mm GMT) and a GMTIIc. PAM definitely looks bigger and is a much more substantial watch weight-wise. I'll have to take a few pics of them side-by-side later and post them.

jms_w · 5 March 2012, 12:27 AM

Took some pics. PAM doesn't looks that much bigger from the top but check out the different in height from the wrist. Also the bigger dial of the PAM and crown guard sticking out also add to the illusion.

subloverR · 5 March 2012, 02:21 AM

Thanks guys!

treeinthecity · 17 March 2012, 08:20 AM

Nice pics. Own the PAM244 and thinking about GMT MasterII.

4 March 2012, 04:07 AM	#1
subloverR Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Saudi Arabia Watch: Oy. Date-SeamasteR Posts: 40	PAM 40 mm and Rolex GMT Hello everyone! Does anyone have PAM 40 mm and Rolex GMT (or submariner)? How do you compare between them? For some reason, I feel that PAM "looks" bigger. I would appreciate if you post pictures of both of them together. Thanks

4 March 2012, 07:47 AM	#5
jimisaint "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Jimi Location: New York Watch: 16710, PAM 50, IWC Posts: 223	Here's a quick picture. PAM 50/GMT Attached Images

4 March 2012, 02:06 PM	#7
jms_w "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: East Coast Watch: 116710LN Posts: 557	I have a PAM00244 (40mm GMT) and a GMTIIc. PAM definitely looks bigger and is a much more substantial watch weight-wise. I'll have to take a few pics of them side-by-side later and post them. __________________ 116520\|116610LV\|116710LN\|16613\|16233 244 232.30.42\|3222.80 A2332212 CFX-200\|Riseman\|GW-M5610

5 March 2012, 12:27 AM	#8
jms_w "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: East Coast Watch: 116710LN Posts: 557	Took some pics. PAM doesn't looks that much bigger from the top but check out the different in height from the wrist. Also the bigger dial of the PAM and crown guard sticking out also add to the illusion. Attached Images __________________ 116520\|116610LV\|116710LN\|16613\|16233 244 232.30.42\|3222.80 A2332212 CFX-200\|Riseman\|GW-M5610

4 March 2012, 05:55 AM	#3
p_mcgee "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Chicago Posts: 2,150	I've got both the older GMT (16710) and a PAM 48. PAM feels bigger and more chunky, though the newer GMT2c feels heavier than the PAM.

4 March 2012, 07:37 AM	#4
mdoc52 Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Matt Location: detroit Watch: AP 26330 Posts: 74	I've got a PAM 244 which is their 40mm GMT and also have a DJII which is 41mm. The PAM is much chunkier on the wrist. Very thick. I've got 7.2 inch wrists and keep my watches around 40mm give or take. Love them both. --- I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=42.618250,-83.125766

4 March 2012, 12:11 PM	#6
Incorrigible "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: J. Knapmeyer Location: Huntington Beach Watch: 116520 & PAM 321 Posts: 226	My PAM 321 feels like a monster compared to the GMTiic. IMO.

5 March 2012, 02:21 AM	#9
subloverR Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Saudi Arabia Watch: Oy. Date-SeamasteR Posts: 40	Thanks guys!

17 March 2012, 08:20 AM	#10
treeinthecity "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Tri Location: boston Watch: Hulk Posts: 88	Nice pics. Own the PAM244 and thinking about GMT MasterII.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)