ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 March 2012, 12:55 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Ryan
Location: Manchester
Watch: GMTiic
Posts: 333
|
The oldest topic ever.. GMT vs Sub
Well I've been having a long debate today with some colleagues as to which of the current ceramics is best looking/bang for buck/practical.
I'm obviously biased as I picked my GMTiic over the Subc as for me it's the nicest looking SS Rolex available, however I have never needed to use the dual timezone feature but nor would I need to be able to submerse my watch heavily if I had a sub. Interestingly one colleague with a 16610 prefers the ceramic GMT if he were to purchase a newer model. What do you guys think? Would be great to hear from people that own both as they won't be forced to either side as easily! Cheers Ryan |
23 March 2012, 12:58 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
I couldn't decide so I got both...
|
23 March 2012, 01:01 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Ryan
Location: Manchester
Watch: GMTiic
Posts: 333
|
Your not included in this discussion it's for us mere SS wearers!
|
23 March 2012, 01:03 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
|
All personal preference. GMTc is perfect for me, but I can understand why the SubC would be perfect for someone else.
|
23 March 2012, 01:03 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
I have both, but the score is 3 to 1 in favor of the Submariner...
I just LOVE diver's watches:)
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
23 March 2012, 01:05 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Kyung
Location: Anywhere?
Watch: cha want...
Posts: 4,488
|
__________________
Instagram: @whatthedeuce_ |
23 March 2012, 01:06 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
|
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat???? |
23 March 2012, 01:08 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,773
|
Sub for me because I don`t need the functionality of the GMT.
|
23 March 2012, 01:09 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Ryan
Location: Manchester
Watch: GMTiic
Posts: 333
|
|
23 March 2012, 01:13 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
|
My favorite watch. A beauty! It's been on my wrist since last June and it gets better every day! I was set on the Explorer 42 for my next whenever that happens, but now it is all GMT.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat???? |
23 March 2012, 01:14 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 116509,A21330,MVQV
Posts: 773
|
I think the GMT's bezel looks too cluttered. It's all Sub for me.
|
23 March 2012, 01:14 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: bp, hu, eu
Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln
Posts: 2,376
|
i chose the sub because it looked to more under the radar and timeless than the gmt with the big numbers on the bezel. i prefered the clasp and the fact that it has no pcl.
on the other hand i love the gmt's green hand and its function. i guess there is no good or bad choice between thes two iconsit is purely a question of taste. i'd be happy to own both especially in the yg and wg versions as above.
__________________
16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman instagram: modus_horologicus |
23 March 2012, 01:15 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
It is still my absolute favorite after 9 month of ownership. You cannot go wrong with the HULK.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
23 March 2012, 01:20 AM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,243
|
i don't own either, so, take this for what it's worth, but, for me, when talking about pre-ceramics, i prefer the GMT (coke/pepsi/black + oyster/jubilee...so many options) over the sub date, but, for the ceramics, it's the sub date all the way (not a fan of the GMTIIc's bezel or PCLs).....especially the hulk.
good that there are so many great options. |
23 March 2012, 01:21 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Sam
Location: Gotham City
Watch: Wall Street
Posts: 9,954
|
Same here, both is the way to go, however, I favor the GMT range simply for the extra complication!
__________________
"Wealth is of the heart and mind, not of the pocket!" "A Watch Is An Emotional Object, And So, It Is The Responsibility Of The Brand To Create Emotion Through It's Products" - Georges Kern "In the 1950s and 60s, they made the Ref 8171, which is a cult collectible—now that’s the ultimate Rolex you could own with a calendar and a moon phase.” - John Reardon "Heh, heh, heh..." - Michael Kilyung |
23 March 2012, 01:32 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
To me, it should be more about functionality than looks, the sub and GMT are very differant watches IMHO.........
|
23 March 2012, 01:41 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
It sounds to me like the only logical solution is to own BOTH.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
23 March 2012, 01:43 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Paradise Valley
Watch: Datejust
Posts: 38
|
For someone who does not travel often I say go with the Sub. The 60 min bezel will get more use than the GMT's 24hr.
However I feel if one travels a couple times or more a year, especially internationally, then the GMT wins. Jumping hour hand for quick time change combined with the GMT function makes it a great tool for traveling. It seems that for those who love both watches, they end up owning both. Just pick which you want first! |
23 March 2012, 01:49 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
Quote:
I'd go with the GMT as well, the second time zone may be unnecessary (for now at least) but I find it more useful than a divers' watch.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
|
23 March 2012, 01:57 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
I prefer the GMTIIC over the SubC. I like the PCLs and the green hour hand.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
23 March 2012, 02:07 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
|
23 March 2012, 02:12 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Sam
Location: Gotham City
Watch: Wall Street
Posts: 9,954
|
Hahahahhaahhahahahahahaha Tears in my eyes now!
__________________
"Wealth is of the heart and mind, not of the pocket!" "A Watch Is An Emotional Object, And So, It Is The Responsibility Of The Brand To Create Emotion Through It's Products" - Georges Kern "In the 1950s and 60s, they made the Ref 8171, which is a cult collectible—now that’s the ultimate Rolex you could own with a calendar and a moon phase.” - John Reardon "Heh, heh, heh..." - Michael Kilyung |
23 March 2012, 02:13 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Donald
Location: Texas
Watch: Sub5513 / Choc1675
Posts: 826
|
I have both but wear the GMT the most.
__________________
'66 5513 Meters First | '77 1675 Chocolate | '85 DateJust 2-Tone | Omega Planet Ocean Chrono XL Orange | 1978 Omega Speedmaster 1st Walk on the Moon |
23 March 2012, 02:14 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: KC
Location: GMT-5
Watch: GSAR
Posts: 2,104
|
That was my solution but old school:
__________________
"Be Real, Buy Real." |
23 March 2012, 02:15 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
|
Sub, Sub, Sub...
The perfect watch. Of course, i am biased!! Still, given the opportunity to do it all over again, I would pick the Sub for two reasons: GMT Bezel is too busy and i dislike the green hour hand
__________________
John Submariner C LN Explorer 42 Polar |
23 March 2012, 02:20 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN Sub
Posts: 427
|
I like both. Originally wanted a GMT love the complication and i do travel frequently overseas. It's definitely the dressier watch with the PCL's but i ended up with the sub c just because i had a chance to get it when they came out at a discount and value wise it made the most sense to me. However i do still want a gmt in full gold someday.
__________________
|
23 March 2012, 02:23 AM | #27 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Quote:
To me, a tool watch should look/function like a tool watch. IMHO ceramics don't make the best tool watches. The ceramics (DSSD, GMTIIc and SubC) are too bling/flashy, heavy, oversized, and less rugged than their predecessors to be proper tool watches - that's why I got mine in untoolish gold. SD, Sub, GMTii, Exp2... now those are tool watches. Ha! If I only had 1% of Sam's fashion sense! |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.