ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

britincali · 29 March 2012, 07:18 AM

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=222884

Date mag looks terrible.....

SaddleSC · 29 March 2012, 07:19 AM

The magnification on that cyclops doesn't look quite right...

capote · 29 March 2012, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaddleSC

The magnification on that cyclops doesn't look quite right...

Agreed. But could be the angle maybe

FNFZ4 · 29 March 2012, 07:22 AM

Yup happened to me. Its the angel i guess.

murphy j · 29 March 2012, 07:22 AM

Definately looks dodgy, but could it be camera angle?

RyanJames · 29 March 2012, 07:24 AM

Seriously over polished lugs too by the look of it..

Springbars poking out all over.

T-Rip · 29 March 2012, 07:27 AM

That looks terrible...

britincali · 29 March 2012, 07:30 AM

I like the "Near mint" description, its been hammered on a polisher multiple times then worn and scratched and dinged up then had the PVD coating done over the scratches lol

mrbill2mrbill2 · 29 March 2012, 07:32 AM

I don't believe it's the angle. The date window doesn't come close to filling the cyclops.

mrbill2mrbill2 · 29 March 2012, 07:35 AM

Look at the right side lugs - the spring bars protrude.

Tony-GB · 29 March 2012, 07:40 AM

I suppose the old saying "buy the seller" comes to mind...

Tridor · 29 March 2012, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by britincali

I like the "Near mint" description, its been hammered on a polisher multiple times then worn and scratched and dinged up then had the PVD coating done over the scratches lol

I agree. Also, that cyclops looks totally wrong to me. That watch is an abomination, IMHO. As a truly wonderful community, I think we all need to "watch out" for each other (all puns intended). Since the piece looks suspicious, perhaps the Mods may want to make further inquiry to ensure safety and authenticity for everyone.

nch209 · 29 March 2012, 08:34 AM

hmmmmmmmmmmmmm... odd looking!

Rollie2011 · 29 March 2012, 08:47 AM

Agreed, looks fugazi

GradyPhilpott · 29 March 2012, 08:48 AM

There are several little things wrong.

The date magnification is just wrong and no angle would improve it.

I'm not as down on PVD as some people, but this watch looks worthless to me.

sierra11b · 29 March 2012, 09:01 AM

Waaaayyy too high of price. You could get a like new one for that price and PVD it yourself if you wanted.

77T · 29 March 2012, 12:31 PM

Saw this type of poor cyclops on another watch in a different post in "Watch Out". Could it be a poor aftermarket replacement crystal on a true Expl.II?

britincali · 29 March 2012, 12:36 PM

^^ Thats what I think it is, he should disclose that and not call it "mint" tho.......

pandrew6l · 29 March 2012, 12:51 PM

Finally after 5 months, I see a TRF for sale watch being questioned. Thank you guys from a new member.

J. Alan · 29 March 2012, 05:53 PM

Agree with all the posts concerning this watch. There are to many gray areas and without proper disclosure by the seller in his ad concerning the questions raised, the Mods should PM him and ask him to voluntarily remove it.

J. Alan

bondtoys · 29 March 2012, 07:00 PM

Have you seen that huge bracelet link , the last one from 12'' before the bracelet enters the clasp?

Andad · 29 March 2012, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pandrew6l

Finally after 5 months, I see a TRF for sale watch being questioned. Thank you guys from a new member.

Not sure I understand your post.

All watches on the Forum are scrutinised by our members.

Why would we question genuine watches?

Have you seen some for sale on the Forum that you thought were fake and did you question them?

dalip · 29 March 2012, 08:00 PM

The thread has been removed and the seller sent a PM.

mcjp6 · 29 March 2012, 08:02 PM

Well something is not right, as that thread has been removed.

If counterfeit then thanks to the mods.

Andad · 29 March 2012, 08:17 PM

I reported this thread earlier as I didn't know if earlier posters had done so.

Things seemed to move very quickly - thanks to the mods.

29 March 2012, 07:18 AM	#1
britincali "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: North Wales UK Watch: 16600,16570,6098 Posts: 706	Dodgey watch on TRF???? http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=222884 Date mag looks terrible..... __________________ Prick club member # 6 P 16600 M Polar EXP II 1951 Waffle dial 6098 https://www.facebook.com/LlwynFfynnon

29 March 2012, 07:19 AM	#2
SaddleSC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Charles B Location: GMT -7 Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 6,131	The magnification on that cyclops doesn't look quite right... __________________ Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB

29 March 2012, 07:27 AM	#7
T-Rip "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Tom Location: Victorville CA Watch: Rolex DSSD 116660 Posts: 3,189	That looks terrible... __________________ T-Rip Formally known as Haydendillon Rolex: DSSD 116660, 16622 PLATTY

29 March 2012, 07:30 AM	#8
britincali "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: North Wales UK Watch: 16600,16570,6098 Posts: 706	I like the "Near mint" description, its been hammered on a polisher multiple times then worn and scratched and dinged up then had the PVD coating done over the scratches lol __________________ Prick club member # 6 P 16600 M Polar EXP II 1951 Waffle dial 6098 https://www.facebook.com/LlwynFfynnon

29 March 2012, 07:32 AM	#9
mrbill2mrbill2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Mr. Bill Location: South Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 6,148	I don't believe it's the angle. The date window doesn't come close to filling the cyclops. __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13

29 March 2012, 07:22 AM	#4
FNFZ4 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Alfred Location: DC Metro Watch: None Posts: 29,368	Yup happened to me. Its the angel i guess.

29 March 2012, 07:22 AM	#5
murphy j Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Jeffrey Location: Oklahoma Posts: 89	Definately looks dodgy, but could it be camera angle?

29 March 2012, 07:24 AM	#6
RyanJames "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Ryan Location: Manchester Watch: GMTiic Posts: 333	Seriously over polished lugs too by the look of it.. Springbars poking out all over.

29 March 2012, 07:35 AM	#10
mrbill2mrbill2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Mr. Bill Location: South Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 6,148	Look at the right side lugs - the spring bars protrude. __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13

29 March 2012, 07:40 AM	#11
Tony-GB "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Tony Location: Oxfordshire, UK Watch: 116680 & 116622 Posts: 3,953	I suppose the old saying "buy the seller" comes to mind... __________________ "...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org

29 March 2012, 08:34 AM	#13
nch209 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Nathan Location: Northern Virginia Posts: 2,775	hmmmmmmmmmmmmm... odd looking! __________________ nch209

29 March 2012, 08:47 AM	#14
Rollie2011 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: John Location: Palm Beach, FL Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42 Posts: 1,654	Agreed, looks fugazi __________________ John Submariner C LN Explorer 42 Polar

29 March 2012, 08:48 AM	#15
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,454	There are several little things wrong. The date magnification is just wrong and no angle would improve it. I'm not as down on PVD as some people, but this watch looks worthless to me. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

29 March 2012, 09:01 AM	#16
sierra11b "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Eric Location: California Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50 Posts: 1,966	Waaaayyy too high of price. You could get a like new one for that price and PVD it yourself if you wanted.

29 March 2012, 12:31 PM	#17
77T 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 41,955	Saw this type of poor cyclops on another watch in a different post in "Watch Out". Could it be a poor aftermarket replacement crystal on a true Expl.II? __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

29 March 2012, 12:36 PM	#18
britincali "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: North Wales UK Watch: 16600,16570,6098 Posts: 706	^^ Thats what I think it is, he should disclose that and not call it "mint" tho....... __________________ Prick club member # 6 P 16600 M Polar EXP II 1951 Waffle dial 6098 https://www.facebook.com/LlwynFfynnon

29 March 2012, 12:51 PM	#19
pandrew6l 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: California Posts: 526	Finally after 5 months, I see a TRF for sale watch being questioned. Thank you guys from a new member.

29 March 2012, 05:53 PM	#20
J. Alan "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Canada Posts: 529	Agree with all the posts concerning this watch. There are to many gray areas and without proper disclosure by the seller in his ad concerning the questions raised, the Mods should PM him and ask him to voluntarily remove it. J. Alan

29 March 2012, 07:00 PM	#21
bondtoys "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: World Watch: 16750 Posts: 2,733	Have you seen that huge bracelet link , the last one from 12'' before the bracelet enters the clasp?

29 March 2012, 08:00 PM	#23
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	The thread has been removed and the seller sent a PM. __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

29 March 2012, 08:02 PM	#24
mcjp6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Michael Location: VK2 - AUS Watch: 5513s Posts: 7,380	Well something is not right, as that thread has been removed. If counterfeit then thanks to the mods.

29 March 2012, 08:17 PM	#25
Andad 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 37,510	I reported this thread earlier as I didn't know if earlier posters had done so. Things seemed to move very quickly - thanks to the mods. __________________ E

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)