The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 April 2012, 02:46 PM   #1
bailey19
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The South
Posts: 29
Exp 2: k for g?

Hi Guys,

I currently have a k serial, 16570 explorer which am thinking of flipping to obtain a (several months old) g serial one. My main reasons for doing so are: 1. To obtain one of the last versions produced for this model (I love the old exp2!!), not to mention a cosmetically newer and fresher case ; and 2. The 3186 movement.

While I do appreciate the lug holes-SEL combination of my K serial (additionally, many folks say that there is no significant difference between the 3185 and 3186 movement), I also feel that upgrading to the last iteration of the 16570 makes sense. The upgrade, however, will cost around $1400. I can come up with the funds but am thinking: is it too much money for what is essentially the same watch?

What do you guys think? What would you do in my shoes?

Thanks!
bailey19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 02:48 PM   #2
toph
"TRF" Member
 
toph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
I think you should be happy with what you have, $1400 wasted in my opinion. put it towrads something else.

Then again do what makes you happy
__________________


"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety."

Member No.# 11795
toph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 02:59 PM   #3
MortgageGuy
"TRF" Member
 
MortgageGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
I guess it would depend on the condition of both watches... If yours has considerable wear and is in need of a service or has not been in the last 5-7 years then I say yes I would make the flip for 1k or so... If not then I would keep what you have.

Some love the lug holes others do not so you will get quite a mix of responses IMO but at the end of the day I think condition will make the decision. The minimal movement changes from a 3185 to 3186 would not get my $$$ alone
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki
MortgageGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 03:02 PM   #4
w4rmk
Banned
 
w4rmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Richard Kloc
Location: New York
Watch: Deepsea D-Blue
Posts: 250
I agree, seems like a waste, and I think the lug holes/SEL combo is just as collectable, if not more so because this combo was only made for a short time. I have the same setup on my A serial and I think it's the best mix before the new solid bracelets came out.
w4rmk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 03:11 PM   #5
Monte Cristo
"TRF" Member
 
Monte Cristo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Watch: ing you...
Posts: 3,775
"...... is it too much money for what is essentially the same watch?"

yes - IMO put the $1400 towards something else.
Monte Cristo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 03:15 PM   #6
stankeyleg
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Josh
Location: montreal
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by MortgageGuy View Post
I guess it would depend on the condition of both watches... If yours has considerable wear and is in need of a service or has not been in the last 5-7 years then I say yes I would make the flip for 1k or so... If not then I would keep what you have.
x2 keep in mind service cost 600$ minimum.
stankeyleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 04:10 PM   #7
gimpex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Greg
Location: Austria
Watch: Sub C LV / Exp II
Posts: 609
I also think the $1400 is too much. Half of that ( being the service costs ) would be more appropriate amount for me to make the switch.
gimpex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 08:25 PM   #8
brettpaul
"TRF" Member
 
brettpaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
Don't do it! Keep the one you have and save for a SEL Sub with lug holes!!
brettpaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 10:21 PM   #9
ecsub44
"TRF" Member
 
ecsub44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
I think the question is the equivalent to taking your money to the bank and asking for all fresh, new, crisp bills. 100% pointless. Money does the same thing whether it's old and worn or new and fresh.

Same thing with your watch. It would be a waste of $1,400 in my opinion.
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete

Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44
ecsub44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 10:43 PM   #10
93 Turbo
"TRF" Member
 
93 Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Australia
Watch: Rolex.Tudor.PAM
Posts: 1,554
Hey, I have 16570 Polar with the 3186 mvt, SEL and no lug holes. I want to add to the collection an earlier 3185 mvt, non SEL & lug holes black faced Exp II. I'm going backwards...

The 3186 movement improvements as stated previously by more learned members here are minor compared to the 3185 mvt. Each provided they are serviced and regulated will preform identically.

You have a great watch. I'd keep it. Just my 2c worth. Good luck
93 Turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 11:26 PM   #11
bailey19
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The South
Posts: 29
Actually from my pov, the main and essential pros of the flip are: 1. Naturally, i get a watch case in better condition ( e.g. The crown guards of the k has lost some of its sharpness though the lugs are in fantastic shape) 2. Movement of the g wont need a service for another 5 years whereas the k is just about at that time. Would these factors in themselves be enough to justify the price?
bailey19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 11:33 PM   #12
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,062
better the devil you know ,,, id stick.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 11:34 PM   #13
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
not sure if the K has lugholes & SEL but if it does, then I would NOT flip it to a G. I have M polar EII & have to say 3186 movement is nice. But, if I had older one with lugholes & SEL I would keep it.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 11:39 PM   #14
bailey19
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The South
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomchicago View Post
not sure if the K has lugholes & SEL but if it does, then I would NOT flip it to a G. I have M polar EII & have to say 3186 movement is nice. But, if I had older one with lugholes & SEL I would keep it.
Yup- its included in that "small window" of serials with that combo ( i think from A serial to the Y)
bailey19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 11:42 PM   #15
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
I would not do it unless I could get the $1,400 down to $1,000. Your watch will need service at some point so call it $500, that would mena the new watch would cost about $500, net, which I could live with
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2012, 12:00 AM   #16
Cru Jones
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 35,630
i don't agree with the comments that the two watches are the same, so, why pay more? now, i'm not saying the G is "better", but, it IS "different": bigger dial & case, it's thicker, it's heavier, it has the solid link bracelet, beefed up clasp with microadjustment, maxi dial, orange text/hand, huge hands, blue lume, A/R on underside of cyclops.

also, the G will have the 3187 (not 3186) movement (not that there is much of any important difference between it and the 3185).

if anything, i'm surprised the difference is "only" $1,400....sounds like a good deal. if you prefer the 216570, why not?
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2012, 12:22 AM   #17
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2025 Titanium Yacht-Master Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,666
These things are always personal decisions.. If people didn't change around and sell/buy, there wouldn't be the active reseller business there is..

If you want a "fresher" version, go for it.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2012, 12:43 AM   #18
bailey19
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The South
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
i don't agree with the comments that the two watches are the same, so, why pay more? now, i'm not saying the G is "better", but, it IS "different": bigger dial & case, it's thicker, it's heavier, it has the solid link bracelet, beefed up clasp with microadjustment, maxi dial, orange text/hand, huge hands, blue lume, A/R on underside of cyclops.

also, the G will have the 3187 (not 3186) movement (not that there is much of any important difference between it and the 3185).

if anything, i'm surprised the difference is "only" $1,400....sounds like a good deal. if you prefer the 216570, why not?
The older 16570s reached g serialdom before they were discontinued.
bailey19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2012, 12:45 AM   #19
Cru Jones
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 35,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by bailey19 View Post
The older 16570s reached g serialdom before they were discontinued.



oh.....ooops! if OP was talking about switching one 16570 for another 16570 then, yes, 100% agree with the others, there is no point.

Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2012, 12:48 AM   #20
corysontag
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Cory Sontag
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Only one owned
Posts: 59
I have learned from this forum in the short time, go for what you love. if you love the new model knock it out, if you would love a change put the 1400 toward something else. Either way good luck
corysontag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2012, 03:32 AM   #21
SILVERMX
"TRF" Member
 
SILVERMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mex/US Border
Watch: SS GMT Master II F
Posts: 19
I would do it
SILVERMX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2012, 03:42 AM   #22
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by bailey19 View Post
Yup- its included in that "small window" of serials with that combo ( i think from A serial to the Y)

Then I say DON'T switch. lughole+SEL is an awesome watch. enjoy it.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2012, 03:42 AM   #23
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
and post pic!
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2012, 04:34 AM   #24
p_mcgee
"TRF" Member
 
p_mcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
There was another thread awhile ago that illustrated that the black outlines around the markers were thinned out in the later 16570 series. I like the older look better.
p_mcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

Takuya Watches

DavidSW Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.