ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 May 2012, 02:40 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
|
The Glidelock clasp is amazing on the SubC
__________________
|
9 May 2012, 02:42 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
|
I would keep the ND. I tried them both, preferred the ND and bought it. Happy I made the right choice.
__________________
|
9 May 2012, 02:54 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
|
9 May 2012, 02:56 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: at home
Posts: 1,330
|
keep the 14060M
|
9 May 2012, 03:13 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
On a direct trade the price difference is around £1,200 so I'd imagine that your trade offer is coming from a dealer, thus allowing for his profit margin.
They are both great watches so I can't recommend one over the other. |
9 May 2012, 03:22 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: LA
Posts: 111
|
hmm... What would be a good price (cash on top) that would make this deal you can't refuse? It's currently at $2350...
|
9 May 2012, 03:34 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 477
|
They're pretty different watches -- one old school, tool watch and the other with more heft and bling. I respect the improvements made to the Sub-C but found it too big, square, and shiny on my 6.75" wrist. The 14060M fit like a glove and looks "just right".
Get the one you like most. If you can't decide, go with the Sub-C if you are a big person, have a big wrist, and are comfortable with a watch that people will notice and that makes a statement. If you're not too big physically or lower key by nature (and like it that way) stick with the no-date. ;-) |
9 May 2012, 03:39 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: USA
Watch: 1675 GMT and Sub C
Posts: 1,443
|
This is exactly what I did two years ago; sold my 14060M and upgraded to the SubC. BEST move I ever made. I did not and have not regretted my decision in the least. However, it is ultimately up to YOU to decide which watch you like better. Best of luck with your decision.
|
9 May 2012, 03:56 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 36
|
I have quite a few friends who have traded "up" to Sub-C from old style and most regret the decision. I myself just got a new 14060M and retired my Sub TT to dress only because of the upgrades to movement "paracrom" (sp) etc. The 14060M is a true classic with great comfort, ruggedness and style.
|
9 May 2012, 04:34 AM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Duy
Location: New Orleans, LA
Watch: Speedmaster 3861
Posts: 1,925
|
Quote:
__________________
De gustibus non est disputandum. |
|
9 May 2012, 06:42 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
Both are fantastic watches, but I'd stick with the 14060M!
|
9 May 2012, 07:04 AM | #42 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,960
|
I have both, and 14060M would be my choice if I can only have one.
Sub C is a better watch in terms of new features. But 14060M is a better watch in terms history to the root, as a tool for diving, looks, comfort, price. See whats more important to you.
__________________
135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R |
9 May 2012, 07:04 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Keep the Sub.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.