|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 May 2012, 07:40 PM
|
#31 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
I would not do it... imho the cyclops is an important part of the design/look
__________________
|
|
|
|
10 May 2012, 07:46 PM
|
#32 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 169
|
Looks great. This is maybe how a downsized seadweller would look if they released one (unlikely as it is)
|
|
|
|
|
10 May 2012, 07:48 PM
|
#33 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,486
|
Nope, that looks bad IMO.
but replace the date with a maxi marker and ---oops that would be a new 114060.
__________________
E 
|
|
|
|
10 May 2012, 08:13 PM
|
#34 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,435
|
Quote:
__________________
- Rolex Explorer - 214270 - Tudor Black Bay - 79230B - Tudor Chronograph - 79270P - Breitling Chronomat - 10th Anniv. - Huguenin Freres Speedmaster Prototype |
|
|
|
|
|
11 May 2012, 04:45 PM
|
#35 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: Midwest
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 191
|
That's what I'm talking about! Looks GREAT..so clean.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
