ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 May 2012, 06:51 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Watch: AP & Rolex
Posts: 953
|
Am I crazy?
Hi. I received my beautiful SD in the mail today and I have a small problem I would like to ask you about. It starts when I got my 16610 Submariner in the mail a few weeks ago. I noticed after wearing it for about 15 minutes that there was a very small scratch in the black dial that could be seen under certain lighting conditions. The seller was very understanding and took the watch back even though he could not see the scratch. Now I received my sea dweller today and under the same bright lighting as before I am able to see a similar scratch in the glossy dial, except that this one is worse than the one I sent back! I contacted the seller and he says that he has owned the watch for a while and never noticed a thing. So am I crazy? Is this a common thing that all these glossy black dials have and I should get over it? I mean what are the chances I get two in a row. That's why I'm starting to thin I am crazy!!!
|
13 May 2012, 07:04 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,903
|
How old is the SD? And can you do a macro pic to help- top of mind would suggest the early onset of a spider crack in the dial's surface black coat.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
13 May 2012, 07:05 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Alex
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 1,944
|
Off to a watchmaker you go, second opinion needed!
|
13 May 2012, 07:07 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
|
13 May 2012, 07:08 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Watch: AP & Rolex
Posts: 953
|
Well, I took a drive to Ross Simon an authorized Rolex dealer because the watch is under warranty from a Rolex Service in 2011. The Rolex guy there was not knowledgable, said the warranty would not cover the dial and he couldn't see the scratch anyway. He didn't use a loop though.
|
13 May 2012, 07:48 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 18
|
Do you wear glasses at all? I do an sometimes think i see dust under screens of phones/ipads etc and its actually the lense of my glasses catching my attention!
|
13 May 2012, 08:00 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Watch: AP & Rolex
Posts: 953
|
I was able to illuminate PART of the scratch by playing around with lighting
|
13 May 2012, 08:03 AM | #8 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
|
can't see the scratch, unless it's just to the left of the flash reflection......
and if that's it, it should not be there.........a clean dial is a sine qua non of any high end watch deal, in fact, of any watch deal, IMHO. i am not a believer in nitpicking a deal, but a scratch on a rolex dial? that is a deal breaker for me, unless it is disclosed in advance...and I must say, most good sellers on TRF(and there are a lot) always tell you about any imperfections in the dial......now if you're buying vintage, you can usually see many imperfections in the dial, and bezel insert, and on the case, but then, that's the vintage market, a whole other ballpark. i'd complain too |
13 May 2012, 08:05 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Alex
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 1,944
|
Interesting, seems to be a scratch there. Why wouldn't Rolex warranty cover that?
|
13 May 2012, 08:11 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
Are you sure that's not a smudge on the crystal? That happens to me sometimes. Have you attempted to clean the crystal just to make sure?
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
13 May 2012, 08:17 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Watch: AP & Rolex
Posts: 953
|
Yes, I've been wiping at it all day lol
|
13 May 2012, 08:23 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Alex
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 1,944
|
Sounds like a send it back job. What a bummer. Funny, Rolex service would have insisted on a new dial, so I guess they damaged it in putting it back together in 2011?
|
13 May 2012, 08:23 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Watch: AP & Rolex
Posts: 953
|
When I asked the guy about the warranty, first he tried to tell me the warranty only lasts one year even though my warranty card says 2 years. then he said the warranty won't cover the dial because warranty is only on the movement.
|
13 May 2012, 08:25 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Watch: AP & Rolex
Posts: 953
|
Do you think if I took it to a more knowledgable AD they would send it to rolex under warranty? I really love the watch but if it can't be fixed I will have to return it :(
|
13 May 2012, 08:25 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
Sorry to hear that, that would bug me too! I definitely see it though.
|
13 May 2012, 08:49 AM | #16 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,985
|
Personally--I would send the watch back and get my money back ASAP! I would not accept that on a watch I just bought--no chance.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
13 May 2012, 09:10 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Watch: AP & Rolex
Posts: 953
|
I talked to the seller and he offered the refund but also he suggested that I try again to get the dial replaced under warranty by RSC which is what I would prefer.
|
13 May 2012, 10:23 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,474
|
IMO take the refund and find one that you are satisfied with otherwise other issues may just go on and on.
__________________
E |
13 May 2012, 10:24 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Alex
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 1,944
|
Let us know how you go!
|
13 May 2012, 10:34 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,456
|
I would take the refund. Why would you want to buy a watch with problems. Save the headache for later and find a different watch.
...Unless the seller pointed it out before hand and made reductions in the price referring to the damage. |
13 May 2012, 10:35 AM | #21 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,985
|
X2
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
13 May 2012, 11:15 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
have you looked at it with a loop? can it be a dust or fiber? I traded my YM for a GMT and that had a fiber on the dial but removed by RSC free of charge.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
13 May 2012, 11:21 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
I concur with this also. If you're not happy, send it back ASAP. I don't think you purchased the watch with the intention of having to sort out a scratched dial as soon as you received it.
|
13 May 2012, 11:42 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Watch: AP & Rolex
Posts: 953
|
Yeah, I'm leaning towards this option as well. I just don't want to end up in a situation where it is hard to source another one. The thing I learned out of all of this is that the SD is the perfect watch for me.
|
13 May 2012, 12:13 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Brian
Location: usa
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 688
|
Find another one, you may never get the dial taken care of!
|
13 May 2012, 12:21 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Point Blank, TX
Posts: 2,894
|
I clearly see it. Send that piece of chit back. A Rolex should be eye clean.
__________________
I once dated a girl in high school and her dad told me I would never amount to anything. He was right |
13 May 2012, 12:31 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Mike G
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP
Posts: 3,075
|
Send it back and let the seller get the dial replaced at a RSC. I would not except that and just be on the hunt for another
|
13 May 2012, 02:21 PM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 26
|
Don't make his problem yours. Send it back.
|
13 May 2012, 02:25 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 257
|
Weird....
|
13 May 2012, 03:43 PM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: daniel tan
Location: Malaysia
Watch: DSSD DJ EXPII PAM
Posts: 210
|
I used to have a Brand new (black glossy dial) Explorer II which i purchased in 2008 also have a scratch on the dial at the same position with yours,i sent it back to RSC (as it still under warranty) and they are willing to change a new one for me.But very unfortunately, the new replacement dial also have a same scratch but this time at different position... (THIS SCRATCH CAN BE SEEN CLEARLY UNDER A "REAL SUNLIGHT" )
The explaination given by RSC to me is every "Glossy Black dial" of Rolex is wiped before it was fixe into the oyster case, no matter how many times i send back to claim for the warranty,the "scratches" will still be there either at diff angle or position... I think this should be the reason why nowadays Rolex has to upgrade to glossy black dial to a matte black dial. And, I also try to go to many AD to check and find out whether other new display Rolex got such an "issue"? The answer is YES ! if u put the Black glossy dial under a sun light without using magnifying glass also can find the "Scratches" easily, this should be considered a defect. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.