ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 June 2012, 10:58 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 47
|
Pre Owned GMT or Datejust??
Hi Guys
Just after your valued advice once again I am looking to get another (less expensive) Rolex to wear day to day as in my job the watch can take a few knocks I have seen a 2006 stainless steel Datejust (box no certificate) and a 1996 GMT 2 Bi Metal (with box and papers) I really like the GMT, Should I be put off by the age of it and go with the newer Datejust? Thanks in advance |
17 June 2012, 11:01 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Is your GMT a 1675? They are classic. I have had two.
Next up will be a root beer. I do prefer SS for daily wear. |
17 June 2012, 11:01 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
what kind of work do you do
What about a Sub 14040M |
17 June 2012, 11:10 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: PP 5320G
Posts: 1,259
|
DJ is great for daily wear.
|
17 June 2012, 11:22 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 47
|
The GMT I am looking at is a 16713 model
It's only the age that puts me off really, I don't know how much of a difference that makes I work as an architect, so I am on building sites alot My other watch I currently own is a stainless sub c, but I want to try and keep it immaculate... I love it |
17 June 2012, 11:48 PM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
16713 is great. Get it!
|
18 June 2012, 02:29 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: James
Location: Sheffield,UK
Watch: Rolex 168000
Posts: 131
|
Yep I vote the TT GMT! I wear mine 24/7 365 days a year!
|
18 June 2012, 03:06 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: united states
Posts: 80
|
I'm biased but....
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1339952753.198852.jpg |
18 June 2012, 03:09 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: US
Watch: SUB C 116610LN
Posts: 353
|
my vote is for the tt GMT.
__________________
ROLEX 116610LN SMP 2254.50.00 ROLEX DateJust 16234 Aqua Terra 231.10.42.21.02.001 Aqua Terra 25773000 (wifes) Breitling A1736006 |
18 June 2012, 03:21 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Watch: SS Daytona Black
Posts: 25
|
Datejust is the most comfortable Rolex i hace ever had (except my lovely 16570 polar):)
|
18 June 2012, 03:59 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jimi
Location: New York
Watch: 16710, PAM 50, IWC
Posts: 223
|
Gmt
__________________
16710LN, 16613TLN, PAM 50, IWC Spitfire Chrono |
18 June 2012, 04:02 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Matt
Location: Northern VA
Watch: 126711, 126610
Posts: 1,803
|
Gmt
|
18 June 2012, 04:08 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Chicago suburbs
Watch: Datejust
Posts: 18
|
I think you should go with a pre-1988 Datejust with the 3035 movement. These had acrylic crystals, which take knocks a LOT better than sapphire, which tends to shatter. The even older ones, with 1570 movements, were slower beat, and without quick-set date, but easier for non-Rolex watchmakers to work on.
With the money you saved on the watch, get it properly serviced. |
18 June 2012, 07:17 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Jersey Shore
Watch: Rolex DJ
Posts: 1,905
|
I m thinking a nice Datejust 16233
__________________
It 10pm do you know where your Datejust is? http://i1187.photobucket.com/albums/...DA0MC5qcGc.jpg |
18 June 2012, 08:54 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
|
For everyday wear in terms of taking knocks, I'd think that the fluted 18K bezel on the DJ would be a bit more in harm's way than the GMT's aluminum insert (the surround is of course still 18K, but less of it ie exposed than on the DJ).
But an all-SS model would be better still, depending of course upon what sort of "knocks" you're needing it to withstand. 18K is far more scratch-prone, and the polished center links on the GMT (assuming an Oyster bracelet, but still holds true on a Jubilee) will show scratches more than will a brushed SS bracelet.
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black. |
18 June 2012, 11:13 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PA
Watch: Sub-c date
Posts: 192
|
GMT would be my choice. DJ seems too dressy for your worksites IMO. Maybe a Pepsi or Coke model.
That said, a second Sub for work would be great! |
18 June 2012, 01:05 PM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Watch: Y. G president
Posts: 16
|
I built my small collection by starting with tt GMT on jubilee...then president...that would e my route...you will love the GMT it is simply ... Cool.
|
18 June 2012, 01:45 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
|
got would be my choice, but age aside, which one has had a more recent service?
|
18 June 2012, 01:46 PM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
|
Quote:
You'd pay a lot less having your SubC serviced and polished/buffed as needed...rather than buying a whole separate watch to take the normal wear-and-tear. Doesn't make sense to me. ...to answer your original question...get the Datejust. Not because of the age, though, just because it's a "cooler" watch.
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.