The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 June 2012, 10:58 PM   #1
tarmyjay
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 47
Pre Owned GMT or Datejust??

Hi Guys

Just after your valued advice once again

I am looking to get another (less expensive) Rolex to wear day to day as in my job the watch can take a few knocks

I have seen a 2006 stainless steel Datejust (box no certificate) and a 1996 GMT 2 Bi Metal (with box and papers)

I really like the GMT, Should I be put off by the age of it and go with the newer Datejust?

Thanks in advance
tarmyjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2012, 11:01 PM   #2
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
Is your GMT a 1675? They are classic. I have had two.
Next up will be a root beer. I do prefer SS for daily wear.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2012, 11:01 PM   #3
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
what kind of work do you do

What about a Sub 14040M
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2012, 11:10 PM   #4
Tan
"TRF" Member
 
Tan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: PP 5320G
Posts: 1,259
DJ is great for daily wear.
Tan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2012, 11:22 PM   #5
tarmyjay
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 47
The GMT I am looking at is a 16713 model

It's only the age that puts me off really, I don't know how much of a difference that makes

I work as an architect, so I am on building sites alot

My other watch I currently own is a stainless sub c, but I want to try and keep it immaculate... I love it
tarmyjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 June 2012, 11:48 PM   #6
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
16713 is great. Get it!
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 02:29 AM   #7
wishywatchy
"TRF" Member
 
wishywatchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: James
Location: Sheffield,UK
Watch: Rolex 168000
Posts: 131
Yep I vote the TT GMT! I wear mine 24/7 365 days a year!

wishywatchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 03:06 AM   #8
bulldogge
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: united states
Posts: 80
I'm biased but....
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1339952753.198852.jpg
bulldogge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 03:09 AM   #9
blama215
"TRF" Member
 
blama215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: US
Watch: SUB C 116610LN
Posts: 353
my vote is for the tt GMT.
__________________

ROLEX 116610LN
SMP 2254.50.00
ROLEX DateJust 16234
Aqua Terra 231.10.42.21.02.001
Aqua Terra 25773000 (wifes)
Breitling A1736006
blama215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 03:21 AM   #10
ersing
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Watch: SS Daytona Black
Posts: 25
Datejust is the most comfortable Rolex i hace ever had (except my lovely 16570 polar):)
ersing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 03:59 AM   #11
jimisaint
"TRF" Member
 
jimisaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jimi
Location: New York
Watch: 16710, PAM 50, IWC
Posts: 223
Gmt
__________________
16710LN, 16613TLN, PAM 50, IWC Spitfire Chrono
jimisaint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 04:02 AM   #12
GermanyMatt
"TRF" Member
 
GermanyMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Matt
Location: Northern VA
Watch: 126711, 126610
Posts: 1,803
Gmt
GermanyMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 04:08 AM   #13
Smaug
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Chicago suburbs
Watch: Datejust
Posts: 18
I think you should go with a pre-1988 Datejust with the 3035 movement. These had acrylic crystals, which take knocks a LOT better than sapphire, which tends to shatter. The even older ones, with 1570 movements, were slower beat, and without quick-set date, but easier for non-Rolex watchmakers to work on.

With the money you saved on the watch, get it properly serviced.
Smaug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 07:17 AM   #14
Oyster1982
"TRF" Member
 
Oyster1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Jersey Shore
Watch: Rolex DJ
Posts: 1,905
I m thinking a nice Datejust 16233
__________________
It 10pm do you know where your Datejust is?
http://i1187.photobucket.com/albums/...DA0MC5qcGc.jpg
Oyster1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 08:54 AM   #15
improviz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
For everyday wear in terms of taking knocks, I'd think that the fluted 18K bezel on the DJ would be a bit more in harm's way than the GMT's aluminum insert (the surround is of course still 18K, but less of it ie exposed than on the DJ).

But an all-SS model would be better still, depending of course upon what sort of "knocks" you're needing it to withstand. 18K is far more scratch-prone, and the polished center links on the GMT (assuming an Oyster bracelet, but still holds true on a Jubilee) will show scratches more than will a brushed SS bracelet.
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black.
improviz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 11:13 AM   #16
wardman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PA
Watch: Sub-c date
Posts: 192
GMT would be my choice. DJ seems too dressy for your worksites IMO. Maybe a Pepsi or Coke model.

That said, a second Sub for work would be great!
wardman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 01:05 PM   #17
Johnn
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Watch: Y. G president
Posts: 16
I built my small collection by starting with tt GMT on jubilee...then president...that would e my route...you will love the GMT it is simply ... Cool.
Johnn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 01:45 PM   #18
versatile1
"TRF" Member
 
versatile1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
got would be my choice, but age aside, which one has had a more recent service?
versatile1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2012, 01:46 PM   #19
ecsub44
"TRF" Member
 
ecsub44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarmyjay View Post
The GMT I am looking at is a 16713 model

It's only the age that puts me off really, I don't know how much of a difference that makes

I work as an architect, so I am on building sites alot

My other watch I currently own is a stainless sub c, but I want to try and keep it immaculate... I love it
Why buy a watch and not wear it?

You'd pay a lot less having your SubC serviced and polished/buffed as needed...rather than buying a whole separate watch to take the normal wear-and-tear.

Doesn't make sense to me.

...to answer your original question...get the Datejust. Not because of the age, though, just because it's a "cooler" watch.
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete

Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44
ecsub44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.