|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 June 2012, 05:12 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Kent
Posts: 242
|
50s Precision
I love the patina on this, so am considering breaking my number one eBay rule of 'don't bid if there aren't pictures of the movement'.
Inscription to the rear doesn't bother me in the least. Obviously the seller has listed it incorrectly as an Oyster when it isn't. Can the experts spot anything else that's wrong with it? http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/9CT-GOLD-R...#ht_1160wt_922 |
|
|
|
30 June 2012, 05:37 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 275
|
Hello,
I had a look at this one myself. The seller has a couple of other vintage Rolexes he is selling and appears to genuine. It is a bit polished for me though and, personally, I don't like engraving in the back. If you can get it for a good price then fine, but they are quite common, so I would hold out for a better one perhaps, you shouldn't have too much trouble finding one. Andy B
__________________
My Watches |
|
|
|
|
30 June 2012, 05:39 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Kent
Posts: 242
|
Agreed, it isn't a great example, but I do like the dial. I definitely wouldn't over-pay for it. I have a figure in mind...
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
